Re: Making trixie debootstrap-able again?

hi kibi, fwiw, bootstraping trixie still works using mmdebstrap, while it fails with debootstrap and cdebootstrap. I've notified #-release about the debootstrap breakage on the 24th and added that mmdebstrap was still working on the 25th...

Bug#1063736: snort removal from bullseye (Re: Bug#1063736: RM: snort -- RoQA; security issues, unmaintained)

clone 1063736 -1 reassign -1 debian-security-support retitle -1 document snort situation in bullseye thanks hi, On Sun, Feb 11, 2024 at 09:44:18PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: bullseye > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >

Bug#1062233: Acknowledgement (bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.12.23~deb12u1)

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 08:01:15PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > debdiff no attached. I've also uploaded already. now! (the attachment was in my previous mail to this bug however.) -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).

Bug#1062233: bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.12.23~deb12u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org [ Reason ] Documentation updates for the Debian Edu bookworm manual, translations updates for the Debian Edu bookworm and bullseye

Bug#1061983: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2024.01.30

-ended.deb11, thanks to Andres Salomon. +Closes: #1061268 + * Add tiles and libspring-java to security-support-limited. Closes: #1057343 + * Drop debian/.gitlab-ci.yml. + + -- Holger Levsen Tue, 30 Jan 2024 17:55:19 +0100 + debian-security-support (1:11+2023.12.11) bullseye; urgency=medium

Bug#1061487: bookworm-pu: package rpm/4.18.0+dfsg-1+deb12u1

On Thu, Jan 25, 2024 at 02:39:03PM +0200, Peter Pentchev wrote: > [ Impact ] > Users who upgrade from RPM 4.16.0 or earlier to 4.18.0 cannot use > their database of packages already installed via RPM. IOW, qubes 4.x users: https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/8482 "Dom0 updates fail

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:29:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > I've just noticed https://release.debian.org/ still says "not yet > > planned" for both 12.5 and 11.9. > Now fixed (pending cron rebuilding and publishing the site). thank you. > > And is the plan to release 12.5 and 11.9 on

Re: Planning for 12.5/11.9

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 07:40:56AM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > > It's time to set a date for 12.5 (taking account of the emergency .4) > > > and 11.9. I expect this to be the penultimate update for bullseye > > > before LTS. > Let's go for the 10th, announcements to follow. I've just

Bug#1054189: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17

hi! On Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 03:23:55PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > In the past this package has been released early via stable-updates; is > that your intention this time, or can it wait until the next point release > expected in February? after having spent a bit too much time thinking

Bug#1060367: release.debian.org: RFC: Transitions check for dupload?

On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 10:06:44PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Warning: Source package barnowl is part of ongoing transitions: > > > (I think I'll be adding some generic way to

Bug#1056222: bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1~deb12u1

control: forcemerge -1 1057891 control: retitle -1 bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1~deb12u1 thanks Hi, I've just uploaded debian-edu-artwork/2.12.4-1 to unstable and expect that we'd want to at least update in bookworm to this. However I'm not sure which debdiff you'd like to

Bug#1054189: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 08:59:31PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > > I've updated this update request for adding 3 more lines to > > security-support-ended.deb11 (and updating d/changelog) > Please go ahead. thanks, uploaded. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Bug#1054189: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.10.17

control: retitle -1 bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.12.11 thanks hi, I've updated this update request for adding 3 more lines to security-support-ended.deb11 (and updating d/changelog) On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 04:46:44PM -0300, Santiago Ruano Rincón wrote: > [ Reason ] >

Re: maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 07-12-2023 12:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 11:18:42AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > I hope that in several hours, > > > https://release.debian.org/britney/excuses_s-p-u.html will have the > > > answer.

maintainer built binary package in stable release, still (Re: Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1)

Hi Adrian, thanks for bringing this to our attention! On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 11:27:04PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Architecture: source amd64 > > Should this be binNMU'ed on amd64 before the release? I think so, yes. > Maintainer-built binaries are not supposed to be in main. yup. > There

Bug#1057103: Acknowledgement (bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.12.20~deb12u1)

hi, attached is the compressed debdiff. I've also uploaded the package to bookworm in the meantime. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ If nothing saves us from

Bug#1057103: bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.12.20~deb12u1

rasilian Portuguese: Fred Maranhão. - Spanish:Eulalio Barbero Espinosa and Francisco Javier Carro Orgeira. . [ Holger Levsen ] * stop sending monthly mails about the bullseye edu manual . debian-edu-doc (2.12.19) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Holger Levsen ] * Update Debian Edu

Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1

hi, On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 01:19:25PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: > [ Reason ] > As reported in #1033791, check_running_kernel fails to find version on > bookworm/(arm64|armhf). > > [ Impact ] > check_running_kernel doesn't work on arm64 and armhf as expected, this is a > regression. > > [ Tests

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

Santiago, I don't object to fixing fails to build on a single core bugs, I just object to fixing them by disabling tests *unconditionally*. A fix disabling the tests on single core system *only* I would not object. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

Am Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:40:55PM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: > + * Update fix-build-on-single-cpu-systems.patch to skip > +"test_write_db_parallel" again. Closes: #1030885. fwiw, I find it wrong to disable tests to make sure a package builds on a single core system. I'd much rather have

Re: severity of bugs that FTBFS because of missing B-D

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 04:17:38PM +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote: > Those bugs were set from 'serious' to 'important' by Sebastian Ramacher a few > months ago and I'd like to revisit this decision now that we are at the > beginning of a new release cycle. but why? IME people will

Bug#1052463: bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.12.18~deb12u1

On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 03:28:28PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 04:45:49PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I'll attach the full (compressed) debdiff in a reply, once this bug has > > made it > > to the list. > see below. hm, I guess attachment

Bug#1052463: bookworm-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.12.18~deb12u1

the package in stable [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable [ Changes ] debian-edu-doc (2.12.18~deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium . * Upload to bookworm. . debian-edu-doc (2.12.18) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Holger Levsen ] * Update Debian Edu Bookworm manual from the wiki

Re: How important are empty directories?

On Tue, Aug 29, 2023 at 08:09:24PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > If everybody agrees that the only place where this causes real life issues > is piuparts, than I rather have piuparts ignore this problem. [...] FWIW, I agree. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Bug#1036757: unblock: debian-security-support/1:12+2023.05.12

On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 05:06:20PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 25-05-2023 15:40, Holger Levsen wrote: > > unblock debian-security-support/1:12+2023.05.12 > unblocked thanks! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷

Bug#1036757: unblock: debian-security-support/1:12+2023.05.12

/debian/changelog 2023-05-12 14:45:22.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,14 @@ +debian-security-support (1:12+2023.05.12) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Holger Levsen ] + * Add wpewebkit to security-support-ended.deb12. Thanks to Alberto Garcia. +Closes: #1035794. + + [ Markus Koschany ] + * Add

Bug#1035522: debian-security-support 11+2023.05.04 flagged for acceptance

On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 10:05:19PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Great. That's now > https://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce/2023/05/msg0.html awesome, thank you! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP:

Bug#1035522: debian-security-support 11+2023.05.04 flagged for acceptance

On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 05:44:30PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > In the interests of not blocking on things other than SRM's free time, > how does this sound as some blurb for an announcement mail? > > > The debian-security-support package tracks the level of security support >

Bug#1035522: debian-security-support 11+2023.05.04 flagged for acceptance

On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 02:38:37PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > thanks! how/when will it moved/be moved to bullseye-updates? > As I mentioned in a previous reply, the _how_ is by a member of SRM > asking dak to do so. (And it will be copied, not moved. The package > stays in p-u as well, in

Bug#1035522: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.05.04

-suite just got this change: Author: Holger Levsen Date: Fri May 19 16:04:35 2023 +0200 pkgs: explicitly state that $suite should be used in d/changelog for uploads to stable-updates. Signed-off-by: Holger Levsen diff --git a/source/pkgs.rst b/source/pkgs.rst +- Uploads to ``

Bug#1035522: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.05.04

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > ic. so I should have uploaded to bullseye-proposed-updates instead? > Any upload goes to p-u first, yeah. So the target should always be > simply "bullseye", by preference. dak will accept a bunch of other > things, including

Bug#1035522: debian-security-support 11+2023.05.04 flagged for acceptance

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:51:36PM +, Adam D Barratt wrote: > The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into > the proposed-updates queue for Debian bullseye. thanks! how/when will it moved/be moved to bullseye-updates? -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀

Bug#1035522: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.05.04

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 06:44:18AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2023-05-18 at 00:44 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > debian-security-support (1:11+2023.05.04) bullseye-updates; > > urgency=medium > Hmmm. I didn't expect that would work, although apparently

Bug#1035522: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.05.04

ted > in stable. yes, that part I am and was familar with. Less clear was ${distro}-updates, which thankfully got resolved through this bug. I think. ;) > In any case, please go ahead. thanks, done so now with this changelog: debian-security-support (1:11+2023.05.04) bullseye-updates; ur

Bug#1035522: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.05.04

hi, friendly ping on this. On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 07:50:37PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > this is a pre-approval request, I have not uploaded this yet (except to > unstable). the package has migrated to bookworm now. > [ Reason ] > > unfortunatly debian-security-support i

Bug#1035522: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.05.04

On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 07:50:37PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > [ Checklist ] > [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog > [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them > [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable > [x] the issue is verified as fixed

Bug#1035524: unblock: debian-security-support/1:12+2023.05.04

debian/changelog 2023-05-04 19:09:45.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +debian-security-support (1:12+2023.05.04) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Holger Levsen ] + * set DEB_NEXT_VER_ID=13 in anticipation of the bookworm release. +Closes: #1034077. Thanks to Stuart Prescott. + * secu

Bug#1035522: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2023.05.04

,14 @@ +debian-security-support (1:11+2023.05.04) bullseye; urgency=medium + + [ Holger Levsen ] + * set DEB_NEXT_VER_ID=12 as bookworm is the next release. Closes: #1034077. +Thanks to Stuart Prescott. + + [ Sylvain Beucler ] + * security-support-limited: add gnupg1, see #982258. + + -- Holg

Bug#1034400: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.12.32

. Closes: #1033451. + + -- Holger Levsen Mon, 27 Mar 2023 20:40:47 +0200 + debian-edu-config (2.12.31) unstable; urgency=medium * sbin/debian-edu-pxeinstall: adjust for memtest86+ 6.10-4, thanks to diff -Nru debian-edu-config-2.12.31/sbin/debian-edu-ltsp-install debian-edu-config-2.12.32/sbin

Bug#1033378: unblock: debian-security-support/1:12+2023.03.23

hangelog 2023-03-23 22:38:23.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,16 @@ +debian-security-support (1:12+2023.03.23) unstable; urgency=medium + + * d/README.source: list steps to be done at the beginning of each release +cycle to avoid bugs like #1033312. + + -- Holger Levsen Thu, 23 Mar 2023

Bug#1032885: unblock: debian-security-support/1:12+2023.03.05

urity-support (1:12+2023.03.17) unstable; urgency=medium [ Moritz Muehlenhoff ] * security-support-limited: add note about libspring-java. [ Holger Levsen ] * security-support-limited: Add openjdk-21 and drop openjdk-17 as the latter is the default (and supported) JDK in book

Bug#1032885: unblock: debian-security-support/1:12+2023.03.05

On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 03:58:45PM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote: > Am Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 01:43:11PM +0100 schrieb Holger Levsen: > > * security-support-limited: > > - for golang and openjdk-17, point to the bookworm manual instead the > > one > > f

Bug#1032885: unblock: debian-security-support/1:12+2023.03.05

-support-limited: - for golang and openjdk-17, point to the bookworm manual instead the one for bullseye. - add mozjs102 based on package description (and #959804). - drop mozjs52 and mozjs60 as they were only present in buster. -- Holger Levsen Sun, 05 Mar 2023 20:39:38 +0100

Bug#1026945: bullseye-pu: package guix/1.2.0-4

Hi Vagrant, On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 02:27:19PM -0800, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2022-12-24, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > Tags: bullseye > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: pu > > X-Debbugs-Cc:

+1 (Re: SONAME bumps (transitions) always via experimental)

On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 12:26:09PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote in a mail with the subject "SONAME bumps (transitions) always via experimental)": > Are there objections against this workflow? (Or voices from people who like > this?) I like this. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

Hi Paul, On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 04:42:43PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Well, the key package set is something else than the set we consider for the > first freeze. doh (obviously), sorry for the noise. > The key package set is a set based on source, so indeed it > doesn't differ per suite.

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 08:42:18AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > I just refreshed the list, it's still there. I used a script on udd, > essentially this: [...] > query = "SELECT DISTINCT package FROM packages WHERE release = 'bookworm' > and essential = 'yes'" [...] this made me check what we're

Bug#1017393: buster-pu: package debian-security-support/1:10+2022.08.23

only present in jessie or earlier. + + -- Holger Levsen Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:57:12 +0200 + debian-security-support (2020.06.21~deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium * Rebuild for buster. diff -Nru debian-security-support-2020.06.21~deb10u1/Makefile.PL debian-security-support-10+2022.08.23

Bug#1017987: bullseye-pu: package debian-security-support/1:11+2022.08.23

the buster one. +- drop mozjs52 and mozjs60 as they were only present in buster. +- drop libv8-3.14, mozjs, mozjs24, swftools and webkitgtk as they were + only present in stretch and earlier. + + -- Holger Levsen Tue, 23 Aug 2022 18:26:34 +0200 + debian-security-support (1:11+2021.03.19

Bug#1017393: buster-pu: package debian-security-support/1:10+2022.08.23

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 09:29:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Mon, 2022-08-15 at 13:50 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > I'd like to introduce an epoch to debian-security-support in buster, > > as used everywhere else since stretch-security (as demanded in > > #988321) [

Bug#1017393: buster-pu: package debian-security-support/1:10+2022.08.23

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu hi, I'd like to introduce an epoch to debian-security-support in buster, as used everywhere else since stretch-security (as demanded in #988321) debian-security-support |

Bug#1014659: logrotate: error: state file /var/lib/logrotate/status is world-readable

Package: logrotate Version: 3.18.0-2+deb11u1 Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-release@lists.debian.org affects: release.debian.org Dear Maintainer, after the bullseye 11.4 point release I started to see the following mails from logcheck: Jul 10 00:00:24 mainframe logrotate[37314]: error:

Re: #975016 - OpenJDK 17 support state for Bullseye

hi, almost exactly a year ago... On Sun, Feb 07, 2021 at 11:59:23AM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > So I'm going with option 1, preparing for an openjdk-17 in bullseye, and > preparing release notes and notes for security support. This is more > conservative than option 2, but allows to do

Re: Propose update of Telegram Desktop in Bullseye

Hi Nicholas, On Sat, Dec 04, 2021 at 01:16:32PM +0300, Nicholas Guriev wrote: > In this email, I would like to discuss the situation with updates of the > telegram-desktop package in stable releases. please don't do this. As in: please use a bug to have this discussion. running 'reportbug

Bug#1000811: bullseye-pu: package debian-edu-doc/2.11.26+deb11u1

On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 01:38:19PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > Holger Levsen will do the upload. this has been done now. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄

Bug#1000511: bullseye-pu: package debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u2

tags 1000511 - moreinfo fixed 995610 2.12.5 thanks On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 11:21:56PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > > The metadata for the first bug implies that it affects unstable and is > > not yet fixed there. Could you please confirm the status? > Yes, the bug is also fixed in unstable,

Bug#1000511: bullseye-pu: package debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u2

On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 01:29:50PM +0100, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > The package will be uploaded soonish by Holger Levsen. I've done this now. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026F

Bug#995341: Highly inappropriate behavior which the RT should be aware of

On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 11:48:48AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > I want to make sure that you're aware of what I consider HIGHLY inappropriate > behavior by Chuck where he is trying to sidestep/override the Xen maintainers > by filing this bug directly to the release.debian.org pseudo

Bug#994627: bullseye-pu: package debian-edu-config/2.11.56+deb11u1

On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 12:16:28AM +0200, Wolfgang Schweer wrote: > [ Other info ] > Holger Levsen will upload the package in case of approval. Given a certain three year old^wnew policy I've went ahead and uploaded this now. -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(

Re: BUG: "bookworm" netboot image still references "bullseye" release

hi, On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 10:29:04PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 31-08-2021 22:10, Christoph Sarnowski wrote: > > Thanks for your reply! I will give it a little more time, then use > > "reportbug debian-installer" to report it. I wasn't sure if reporting on > > the netboot image should go

Bug#991852: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.26

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 02:50:27PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Please unblock package debian-edu-doc [...] > unblock debian-edu-doc/2.11.26 thanks for filing this unblock request, Adrian! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀

Bug#991535: marked as done (unblock: developers-reference/11.0.21)

Hi Paul, On Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 02:03:02PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > On 27-07-2021 03:17, Holger Levsen wrote: > > Please unblock package developers-reference 11.0.21, which is a > > documentation > > and translation only update: > Unblocked. thank you

Bug#991535: unblock: developers-reference/11.0.21

. -- Holger Levsen Tue, 20 Jul 2021 15:20:35 +0200 debdiff developers-reference_11.0.20.dsc developers-reference_11.0.21.dsc |diffstat debian/changelog | 17 - source/best-pkging-practices.rst |2 source/locales/de/LC_MESSAGES/best

Bug#991318: unblock: munin/2.0.67-2

/munin directory exists. +Closes: #990371. + + -- Holger Levsen Tue, 20 Jul 2021 14:40:08 +0200 + munin (2.0.67-1) unstable; urgency=medium [ Holger Levsen ] diff -Nru munin-2.0.67/debian/munin-node.service munin-2.0.67/debian/munin-node.service --- munin-2.0.67/debian/munin-node.service

Bug#991285: unblock: strip-nondeterminism/1.12-0.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, I'm wondering whether it makes sense to unblock strip-nondeterminism 1.12.0-1, which has been uploaded on 2021-05-07 and which

Re: youtube-dl: needs version update to 2021.05.16 to continue working with youtube

Hi Andreas, [diclaimer: i'm not a release team member.] On Fri, Jul 02, 2021 at 05:31:48AM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi release team, [...] > I do not want to do an upload to unstable without your agreement and I > hope you can come up with some good advise what to do. [...] a.) since about

Bug#990171: unblock: apparmor-profiles-extra/1.34

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 09:57:02AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > [ Reason ] > The autoremoval will be before the fix for RC bug #989193 migrates. (I dont think so, but that's beside my point here.) > [ Impact ] > The package will not be available in the bullseye release and so > various apps will

Bug#990142: unblock: debian-edu/2.11.37

:14:40.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +debian-edu (2.11.37) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Wolfgang Schweer ] + * tasks/common: Recommend plocate as preferred locate. (Closes: #989518) +Thanks to Paul Wise for informing us. + + -- Holger Levsen Wed, 09 Jun 2021 23:14:40 +0200 + debian-edu

Bug#990139: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.56

running apt update) + to cover all these cases. + + -- Holger Levsen Sat, 05 Jun 2021 00:06:13 +0200 + debian-edu-config (2.11.55) unstable; urgency=medium [ Wolfgang Schweer ] diff -Nru debian-edu-config-2.11.55/cf3/cf.exim debian-edu-config-2.11.56/cf3/cf.exim --- debian-edu-config

Bug#989865: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20210606+fixed1

On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:16:03AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > A full diff is attached. a classic, now! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C ⠈⠳⣄ We are done with ‘wo

Bug#989865: unblock: debian-installer-netboot-images/20210606+fixed1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-installer-netboot-images, it includes the images to netboot bullseye d-i RC2, it's used by the education-main-server package at least ;) I'm not planning on

d-e-install: drop powerpc recipes

package: debian-edu-install x-debbugs-cc: debian-...@lists.debian.org version: 1.916 On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:59:51AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > debian-edu-install (2.11.13) unstable; urgency=medium [...] > [auto-generated below] [...] > lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac

Bug#989484: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.24

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-edu-doc 2.11.24, it just contains documentation and translation updates. debian-edu-doc (2.11.24) unstable; urgency=medium . * Update Debian Edu Bullseye

Bug#989483: unblock: debian-edu-install/2.11.13

. + + -- Holger Levsen Mon, 24 May 2021 12:43:46 +0200 + debian-edu-install (2.11.12) unstable; urgency=medium [ Wolfgang Schweer ] diff -Nru debian-edu-install-2.11.12/debian/debian-edu-profile-udeb.dirs debian-edu-install-2.11.13/debian/debian-edu-profile-udeb.dirs --- debian-edu-install-2.11.12

Bug#988372: closed by Paul Gevers (Re: Bug#988372: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55)

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 08:06:06PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report > which was filed against the release.debian.org package: > #988372: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55 [...] > On 11-05-2021 15:22, Holger

Bug#988372: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.55

a full name for diskless workstation to show up in the iPXE menu. - Use BD ISO image as mirror to enable complete offline installations of a combined server. -- Holger Levsen Thu, 29 Apr 2021 15:27:17 +0200 unblock debian-edu-config/2.11.55 Thanks for your work on releasing bullseye

Bug#988192: unblock: debian-cd/3.1.34

custom splash images are used unmodified. + + [ Petter Reinholdtse ] + * Include eatmydata deb for d-i to use offline. Closes: #986772 + + [ Steve McIntyre ] + * Shorten "ppc64el" to "p64el" in the volume ID. The bullseye d-i +RC1 build failed as the volume ID was too long. + + -

Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date follow up and possible confirmation

hi, On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 02:23:07AM +0200, jorkanof...@tutanota.com wrote: > As stated in a previous email, there was a tentative release date for > Bullseye scheduled on May 22 2021, as stated in this mailing list post: > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2021/04/msg00552.html. It is >

Bug#987992: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.23

: +- Polish: WaldiS +- Portuguese (Portugal): José Vieira + + [ Wolfgang Schweer ] + * debian/control: add Suggests: on the related legacy counterpart to +debian-edu-doc-{fr,ja,nb-no,nl,pt-pt,zh-cn}. This completes the fix for +Bug #985703. Thanks again to Andreas Beckmann. + + -- Holger

Bug#987783: unblock: debian-edu-install/2.11.12

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 02:21:07PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > Please unblock package debian-edu-install 2.11.12 which fixes a bug by > increasing partitioning sizes preventing installation in certain situations. I forgot to mention the package contains an udeb, which is not used by the d

Bug#987783: unblock: debian-edu-install/2.11.12

image is used or installation happens via PXE. + Thanks to Philip Hands for spotting this on https://openqa.debian.net. + * Update after running 'make update-partman-recipes'. + + -- Holger Levsen Tue, 20 Apr 2021 15:46:08 +0200 The change is entirely trivial and tested on openqa.debian.net

Bug#986984: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.22

Hi Paul, On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 09:56:01PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > I guess that's about the best we can do for such -doc packages. I > realize it's slightly "unfair" because of the different treatment we > have in the current freeze, but I wonder if adding autopkgtest (to test > as-installed

Bug#986984: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.22

Hi Paul, On Sat, Apr 17, 2021 at 09:57:38PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 02:23:22 +0200 Holger Levsen wrote: > > Please unblock package debian-edu-doc 2.11.22, it adds a new translation > > and thus > > a new binary package and won't migrate on its ow

Bug#986985: unblock: fonts-liberation2/2.1.3-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package fonts-liberation2 2.1.3-1, it's a key package, and it's also a maintenance release and the changes have been 31 days in unstable and the (deb)diff is reasonable: $

Bug#986984: Acknowledgement (unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.22)

hi, it seems this bug report didn't make it through to the lists because of the attachment's size: Subject: unblock: debian-edu-doc/2.11.22 Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package debian-edu-doc 2.11.22,

Bug#986983: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.54

:15.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,31 @@ +debian-edu-config (2.11.54) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Wolfgang Schweer ] + * share/glib-2.0/schemas/31_debian-edu+mate.gschema.override: Set existing +mate-panel layout file for the panel to show up. Closes: #986448. + + -- Holger Levsen Wed, 07 Apr 2021

Bug#986982: unblock: debian-edu-artwork/2.11.5-3

-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Andreas Beckmann ] + * Clean up obsolete ldm-theme alternative on upgrades. (Closes: #986535) + + -- Holger Levsen Wed, 07 Apr 2021 20:56:21 +0200 + debian-edu-artwork (2.11.5-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Wolfgang Schweer ] diff -Nru debian-edu-artwork

Bug#986980: unblock: debian-edu/2.11.36

) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Wolfgang Schweer ] + * tasks/music: Recommend musescore3 instead of musescore. (Closes: #985079) +- Also add Suggests on musescore, thanks to Thorsten Glaser. + + [ Holger Levsen ] + * Move currently unavailable debian-installer-11-netboot-(amd64|i386) +packages

Bug#986979: unblock: libdnf/0.55.2-6

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libdnf, 0.55.2-6 fixes #986802 / CVE-2021-3445. $ * debdiff libdnf_0.55.2-5.dsc libdnf_0.55.2-6.dsc diff -Nru libdnf-0.55.2/debian/changelog

Bug#984605: unblock: debian-edu-config/2.11.51

,3 +1,11 @@ +debian-edu-config (2.11.51) unstable; urgency=medium + + [ Wolfgang Schweer ] + * cf3/cf.dhcpserver: Make sure the dhcpd.leases file exists. Closes: #984596. +(Without a leases file, isc-dhcp-server remains in starting stage forever.) + + -- Holger Levsen Fri, 05 Mar 2021 19:58:03 +01

Re: golang-github-revel-revel: Depends on network in tests

On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 07:23:19PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > There's multiple things to say. [...] > 2) if possible, those tests should be in a separate autopkgtest > paragraph, such then when needs-internet tests are skipped (e.g. because > the infra doesn't provide access, like in Ubuntu) the

Bug#982598: incomplete logs for autopkg tests

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 08:35:11PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Unfortunately, we're hitting infrastructure issues if we don't cap the > logs [1]. However, I think we should save the last part (and not the > first part) if we have to cap, because normally the failure happens in > the end. I'd keep

Bug#982399: unblock: adequate/0.15.4

On Tue, Feb 09, 2021 at 06:51:57PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > As adequate is actively being used by piuparts, I'd like to see it in > bullseye. shouldn't adequate be a key package given it's used on piuparts.d.o as well? -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁

Re: from >3500 down to 11 (packages in bullseye not built on buildds)

Hi Paul, On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 07:18:42PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#soft mentions > """ > Please note that packages that are in bullseye at the start of the soft > freeze can still be removed if they are buggy. This can happen manually >

from >3500 down to 11 (packages in bullseye not built on buildds)

hi, so, after me doing 540 no-source-change source-only NMUploads in December 2020 and 2940 in January 2021 we've come down from >3500 binary packages in bullseye which were not built on buildds to 11. That's pretty awesome! [1] (It also means that currently I have uploaded >10% of all of

source-only uploads for future point releases (Re: Bug#980962: buster-pu: package intel-microcode/3.20201118.1~deb10u1)

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 04:32:27PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > Please feel free to upload, bearing in mind that the window for 10.8 > > closes during this weekend. > Uploaded (source, i386, amd64). one can do source only uploads to stable(-security) and oldstable() too. Can we

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 06:30:25PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 1/26/21 5:55 PM, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >>>> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is >

Re: Bug#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 04:36:13PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: > >> :) note however that "#975016: OpenJDK 15 support state for Bullseye" is > >> still > > ping, has there been any progress on this? > chatting with Moritz from the security team, we found four options: > 1) Ship a snapshot of

Bug#980491: [pre-approval] buster-pu: package debian-edu-config/2.10.65+deb10u7

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 03:01:31PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Please go ahead. uploaded, thanks! -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ PGP fingerprint: B8BF 5413 7B09 D35C F026 FE9D 091A B856 069A AA1C ⠈⠳⣄ Stop

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 08:05:19AM +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote: > And let me restate that it’s not my intent to make anyone’s life hell and > I am willing to help with any package (as usual). I am just trying to do > the most sane thing to do security and maintainer wise. oh sure, I never expected

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >