Re: New proposed-updates diff: mercurial 3.5.2-2~bpo8+1

2015-10-25 Thread Javi Merino
> > +++ mercurial-3.5.2/debian/changelog2015-10-25 12:26:08.0 > > + > > @@ -1,3 +1,145 @@ > > +mercurial (3.5.2-2~bpo8+1) jessie-backports; urgency=medium > > + > > + * Rebuild for jessie-backports. > > + > > + -- Javi Merino <vi...@debian.org> Sun, 25 Oct 2015 12:26:00 + > > signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#773796: wheezy-pu: package mercurial/2.2.2-4

2015-02-01 Thread Javi Merino
On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 08:49:31PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 15:24 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On 2014-12-23 14:55, Javi Merino wrote: On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 01:20:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: The patches look

Bug#773796: wheezy-pu: package mercurial/2.2.2-4

2014-12-23 Thread Javi Merino
-sensitive +directories allow for remote code execution on pull. + + -- Javi Merino vi...@debian.org Tue, 23 Dec 2014 12:42:20 +0100 + mercurial (2.2.2-3) unstable; urgency=low * Fix Backport improvement to vimdiff configuration by adding diff -Nru mercurial-2.2.2/debian/patches

Bug#773796: wheezy-pu: package mercurial/2.2.2-4

2014-12-23 Thread Javi Merino
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 01:20:10PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi, On 2014-12-23 12:15, Javi Merino wrote: mercurial in wheezy is affected by CVE-2014-9390[0] (Errors in handling case-sensitive directories allow for remote code execution on pull

Bug#773847: unblock: mercurial/3.1.2-2

2014-12-23 Thread Javi Merino
, +and +from_upstream__pathauditor_check_for_Windows_shortname_aliases.patch +(Closes: #773640) + + -- Javi Merino vi...@debian.org Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:01:50 +0100 + mercurial (3.1.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version diff -Nru mercurial-3.1.2/debian/patches

Bug#726700: nmu: mercurial_2.7.1-2~bpo70+1

2013-10-18 Thread Javi Merino
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, It looks like I didn't build mercurial 2.7.2-1~bpo70+1 in a wheezy chroot[0]. If it's possible to ask for binnmus for backports packages, can you do it please? [0]

Give back mercurial for s390x

2013-08-15 Thread Javi Merino
Hi debian-release, mercurial 2.7-1 built in s390x just fine but it failed in 2.7-2. mercurial 2.7-2 changes where some files are installed, but it otherwise is the same source, so the testsuite that passed for 2.7-1 should still pass, can you please give it back for s390x? gb mercurial_2.7-2 .

Bug#701600: unblock: mercurial/2.2.2-3

2013-02-24 Thread Javi Merino
upstream (Closes: #701168) + + -- Javi Merino vi...@debian.org Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:52:22 + + mercurial (2.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low * Fix Please add patch from http://bz.selenic.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3511; diff -Nru mercurial-2.2.2/debian/patches

Bug#692797: unblock: python-greenlet/0.3.1-2.1

2013-02-04 Thread Javi Merino
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 11:21:54AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 16:30:04 +, Javi Merino wrote: On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:45:44PM +, Javi Merino wrote: Hi Laszlo, On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:50:40 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: On Wed, 2012-12-19

Bug#692797: unblock: python-greenlet/0.3.1-2.1

2013-02-04 Thread Javi Merino
On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:50:40PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: 0.3.1-2.3 seems to add /usr/share/dpkg/buildflags.mk to debian/rules, with no build-dependency, which is not the same thing as compile with -O2 on mipsel. Why? That was an overlook on my side, I should fix that. Or

Bug#692797: unblock: python-greenlet/0.3.1-2.1

2013-01-26 Thread Javi Merino
Hi Laszlo, On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:50:40 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 19:55 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 13:34 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 23:08 +0100, Jelmer Vernooij wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 06:08 +, Adam

Bug#692797: unblock: python-greenlet/0.3.1-2.1

2013-01-26 Thread Javi Merino
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 01:45:44PM +, Javi Merino wrote: Hi Laszlo, On Fri, 21 Dec 2012 22:50:40 +, Laszlo Boszormenyi wrote: On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 19:55 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2012-11-24 at 13:34 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 23:08 +0100

Bug#698671: unblock: mercurial/2.2.2-2

2013-01-21 Thread Javi Merino
23:33:20.0 + @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +mercurial (2.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low + + * Fix Please add patch from http://bz.selenic.com/show_bug.cgi?id=3511; +by adding it (Closes: #698634) + + -- Javi Merino vi...@debian.org Mon, 21 Jan 2013 23:33:20 + + mercurial (2.2.2-1) unstable

Bug#672416: nmu: mercurial_2.2.1-2

2012-05-10 Thread Javi Merino
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu gb mercurial_2.2.1-2 . kfreebsd-amd64 -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64

Re: Fwd: Bug#598850: please consider including mercurial 1.6.4 in squeeze

2010-10-17 Thread Javi Merino
On 06/10/10 22:27, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 08:15:25 -0500, Javi Merino wrote: Hi release managers, I would like to ask for a freeze exception for mercurial/1.6.4-1 . mercurial/1.6.4-1 is a new upstream release that fixes #598841. 1.6.X upstream releases are only

Fwd: Bug#598850: please consider including mercurial 1.6.4 in squeeze

2010-10-04 Thread Javi Merino
Hi release managers, I would like to ask for a freeze exception for mercurial/1.6.4-1 . mercurial/1.6.4-1 is a new upstream release that fixes #598841. 1.6.X upstream releases are only bugfix releases (new features will be in 1.7). The packaging between 1.6.2-2 and 1.6.4-1 is the same except for