Hi,
Am Montag, den 02.09.2019, 10:57 +0200 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> FWIW, I started working on this. Unfortunately we do not really have
> transactions available to schedule all or nothing. If someone has a
> creative idea on how to best signal back partial success, let me know.
> :)
>
> (My
Hi,
about the last point: you can treat it like a script and run it with
`runhaskell`
Cheers,
Joachim
Am 27. August 2019 21:50:11 MESZ schrieb Philipp Kern :
>On 8/27/2019 7:39 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 19:40 +0300, Ilias Tsitsimpis wrote:
>>> So, how can we move
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.08.2019, 16:36 + schrieb PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel:
> > I just scheduled the set of binNMUs seemingly required Haskell. I hope
> > this was the right thing to do at this time. Really someone more active
> > should take over that job.
>
> Where is the documentation of
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 25.08.2019, 16:07 + schrieb Dmitry Bogatov:
> Hi!
>
> With GHC-8.6.5 is in unstable, many haskell libraries are no longer
> uninstallable. Right now I am interested in libghc-shake-dev, since it
> is needed for test suite of src:dh-runit[1].
>
> So, what is the status?
f non-haskell related transitions).
>
>As I understand it haskell binnmus are normally handled by Joachim
>Breitner, who has a script that outputs what needs binnmuing and feeds
>output from that script into wanna-build. Is there some issue that is
>blocking this at the moment.
-1.19/debian/changelog 2016-10-27 18:37:21.0 -0400
+++ lhs2tex-1.19/debian/changelog 2017-06-05 12:29:08.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+lhs2tex (1.19-5) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Depend on texlive-science (closes: #864225)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner <nome...@debian.org> M
+(Closes: 861976)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner <nome...@debian.org> Sat, 06 May 2017 16:56:46 -0400
+
haskell-glut (2.7.0.10-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Upload to unstable as part of GHC 8 transition.
diff -Nru haskell-glut-2.7.0.10/debian/patches/series
haskell-glut-2.7.0.10/debian/patches/
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
in order to fix #814055 and #813078, and prevent auto-removal of
git-annex in testing, without waiting for the current Haskell
transition,
Hi Adrian,
Am Montag, den 21.12.2015, 00:00 +0100 schrieb John Paul Adrian
Glaubitz:
> On 12/20/2015 11:02 PM, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > ah, I was mislead by the mail address you use, but you are an
> > uploading DD – so since you have built it anyways, why don’t you
&g
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 19.12.2015, 12:56 + schrieb Niels Thykier:
> Joachim Breitner:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was since then told that arch-all binNMUs are not properly supported,
> > so sorry for filing a few a while ago. Anyways, one of them was
> > haskell-intern,
Hi,
I was since then told that arch-all binNMUs are not properly supported,
so sorry for filing a few a while ago. Anyways, one of them was
haskell-intern, where I rebuild libghc-intern-doc to be built against
the version of haddock in unstable (virtual package
haddock-interface-27). But it seems
Hi,
Am Montag, den 03.08.2015, 23:34 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 22:55:17 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > Can you tell whether the Haskell packages are entangled with the
> > GCC 5 transition?
>
> I'd rather not have both at the same ti
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 16:54 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
Mind you, some of the haskell packages are waiting for icu, which
is waiting for gcc-5. Examples include haskell
-blogliterately/amd64[1] and haskell-text-icu/amd64[2].
I am not sure this is good...
well, at least it
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 18:26 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
From the top of my head, there is haskell-src-exts on mips and mipsel,
together with reverse dependencies (haskel-hoogle, hlint, hothasktags).
libghc-hlint-dev, libghc-hlint-prof are still in unstable, blocking
Dear release team,
from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable should
be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not
indicate any errors on release architectures, and the release tracker²
only shows what I believe are false negatives.
Nevertheless, none of
Hi,
Am Montag, den 24.08.2015, 13:55 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 24/08/15 13:37, Joachim Breitner wrote:
from my understanding, the current Haskell packages in unstable
should
be able to migrate to testing. At least my binNMU tool¹ does not
indicate any errors on release
Dear release team,
the Debian Haskell Team is eager to start on GHC-7.10 real soon,
hopefully before or at DebCamp.
Can you tell whether the Haskell packages are entangled with the GCC 5
transition?
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ#
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.07.2015, 16:30 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 07/07/15 16:08, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
the recent round upgrades is almost through. I think we upgraded 180
packages or so, and binNMUed almost all the rest.
Looking at
https
Hi,
the recent round upgrades is almost through. I think we upgraded 180
packages or so, and binNMUed almost all the rest.
Looking at
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html
there are two things that need to happen:
* FTP-Master needs to remove haskell-iteratee and
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I just got 763 mails, one per Haskell package that migrated to testing.
This is of course very nice and makes me happy, but still quite a lot.
Would it make sense to group these mails per
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2015, 02:56 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo Monfort:
On 25/06/15 12:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 24/06/15 16:12, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim
Breitner:
* leksah ought to be removed from
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 25.06.2015, 02:53 +0200 schrieb Emilio Pozuelo
Monfort:
This may need a binNMU:
haskell-trifecta (1.4.3-1 to 1.5.1.3-4)
Maintainer: Debian Haskell Group
9 days old (needed 5 days)
libghc-trifecta-dev/ppc64el unsatisfiable Depends:
Hi, especially Mehdi,
subject says it all: Is there a good reason ppc64el is not tracked on
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html ?
(I missed the pending problem about trifecta because of that.)
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 23.06.2015, 15:05 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
* leksah ought to be removed from testing:
https://bugs.debian.org/789521
✓
* Then I’m waiting for these binNMUs to be built
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=haskell-happstack-server+haskell
Hi,
another update.
Am Sonntag, den 21.06.2015, 20:25 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
So it seems that with the right removal hints (basically everything
that has an RM bug + haskell-leksah + haskell-leksah-server) and some
aging, we could be good to go.
The FTP team performed all
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Control: block 789365 by -1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as explained in #789365 leksah is one blocker for the Haskell
transition. In order to distangle these issues,
Dear release team,
a small update on this.
Am Samstag, den 20.06.2015, 12:24 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
* shake not building on powerpc
Identified as a bug in ghc, test suite disabled.
We now have weird test suite failing issues on kfreebsd-*, that seem to
depend on the builder
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release team,
we (the Debian Haskell Group) has been working hard to get everything in
order for GHC 7.8 to migrate to testing (and
Hi,
On Tue, 15 Jan 2013 13:24:33 +0100 Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 03:16:42PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
I'd seriously argue that one of the source packages has to change its name. I
don't think that the two namespaces (source and binary packages) should be
~). If I used piuparts
+correctly, this finally closes: #781649.
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Wed, 01 Apr 2015 13:35:10 +0200
+
ghc (7.6.3-20) unstable; urgency=medium
- * Mark all triggers -noawait. Possibly Closes: #769554
+ * Mark all triggers -noawait. Possibly Closes
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package darcs. A RC bug was filed against it due to
insufficient copyright statements, this was fixed by Christopher
Reichert.
Hi,
Am Montag, den 29.12.2014, 23:42 + schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
Strictly speaking this upload is blocked by 0.22.2-1 which didn't migrate
before the freeze began. I'm fine with both uploads though, so unblocked.
thanks!
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
for the same reason that this release required several
attempts. Sigh. So I guess
screen-message (0.22.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release (Closes: 763429)
-- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Tue, 30 Sep 2014 15:48:32 +0200
was never seen by the bts, hence closing it now
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Ok, I managed to upload it...
Am 27. Dezember 2014 18:32:22 MEZ, schrieb Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk:
On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 18:28 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.12.2014, 17:21 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Control: tags -1
+1,14 @@
+screen-message (0.23-1) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * New upstream release:
+
+Disable temporary disabling of anti-aliasing
+
+It seems to have stopped working with recent versions of gtk3, and
+furthermore causes every second keypress to be ignored.
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.12.2014, 17:21 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2014-12-27 at 18:14 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
the latest upload of screen-message contains a fix for a problem that
appeared due to some unidentified dependency change a few
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.12.2014, 17:32 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
Not ftp-master, but the queued log says:
Dec 23 18:58:25 processing /screen-message_0.23-1_amd64.changes
Dec 23 18:58:25 GnuPG signature check failed on
screen-message_0.23-1_amd64.changes
Dec 23 18:58:25
+
+ * Make the trigger -noawait, to avoid trigger cycles, as recommended by
+Guillem Jover (Closes: #772867)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Sat, 13 Dec 2014 14:05:12 +0100
+
haskell-hoogle (4.2.33-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Demote Recommends: apache2 to suggests (Closes
Breitner nome...@debian.org Mon, 24 Nov 2014 22:45:09
+0100[0;0m
[1;34m+[0;0m
[1;34m+haskell-src-exts (1.14.0.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium[0;0m
[1;34m+[0;0m
[1;34m+ * Fix passing ggc-min-expand=10 to gcc. [0;0m
[1;34m+[0;0m
[1;34m+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Mon, 24 Nov 2014
triggers -noawait. Possibly Closes: #769554
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Sun, 23 Nov 2014 11:20:59 +0100
+
ghc (7.6.3-19) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix armel/armhf script munging; ghci and runghc are not available on
diff -Nru ghc-7.6.3/debian/control ghc-7.6.3/debian/control
+0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+haskell-tls (1.2.9-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Disable SSL3 by default (Closes: #768164)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Sun, 16 Nov 2014 21:47:16 +0100
+
haskell-tls (1.2.9-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream version.
diff -Nru haskell-tls-1.2.9
/changelog 2014-11-07 15:54:40.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+haskell-hoogle (4.2.33-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Demote Recommends: apache2 to suggests (Closes: #768447)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Fri, 07 Nov 2014 15:54:40 +0100
+
haskell-hoogle (4.2.33-2) unstable; urgency
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: britney
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as just discussed on IRC, britney’s --dry-run does not actually make it
run dry, i.e. not write any files.
It would be nice if there
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2014, 18:36 -0700 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
small update: I just went through the various transitions problems and
discovered that a sizeable number of packages failed to build on
kfreebsd-* due to buildd-related error (out of disk) some week ago. I
gave them back
Hi,
Am Montag, den 25.08.2014, 09:30 -0700 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Sonntag, den 24.08.2014, 18:36 -0700 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
small update: I just went through the various transitions problems and
discovered that a sizeable number of packages failed to build on
kfreebsd-* due
Hi,
small update: I just went through the various transitions problems and
discovered that a sizeable number of packages failed to build on
kfreebsd-* due to buildd-related error (out of disk) some week ago. I
gave them back.
That, and a give back of a failed build of haskell-http-conduit on
[Adding d-release back to the CC.]
Hi Sven,
Am Samstag, den 23.08.2014, 12:32 +0200 schrieb Sven Bartscher:
That's actually pretty strange. I tried to install the packages in
question on one of my machines (jessie amd64) and apt didn't have any
problems with the dependencies.
Even more
Hi,
we all know that Haskell packages tend to become uninstallable in
unstable, but until now I thought that britney will ensure that
installable packages in testing stay installable.
We have a jenkins job ensuring this (simply by trying to install all
haskell packages), but today it started
Dear Release Team,
Am Samstag, den 05.07.2014, 09:37 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
* In two months (5th of Sep), we will close down for transitions! Do
not start new transitions after this date. They might result in
removals from jessie or reverts in unstable.
[..]
*Remember*: On
Am Sonntag, den 08.06.2014, 19:46 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
- Removals in hints has been one of the remaining issues with the
original auto hinter handling haskell automatically.
Yay!
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 29.05.2014, 09:38 +0200 schrieb Niels Thykier:
On 2014-05-28 23:34, Joachim Breitner wrote:
[...]
diagrams-lib has been removed from unstable, so we should be good to go.
Sadly, its rdeps seem to remain[1]. I have prodded Scott about it on IRC.
Seems to be done
Hi,
Am Montag, den 26.05.2014, 17:22 +0200 schrieb Jérôme Vouillon:
Judging from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pkg-haskell-maintainers%40lists.alioth.debian.orgsuite=sidcompact=compacta=amd64,armel,armhf,i386,kfreebsd-amd64,kfreebsd-i386,mips,mipsel,powerpc,s390,s390x
that
Dear FTP-Team,
may I nudge you about #748514? It seems that this is the remaining
outstanding issue that prevents a large number of Haskell packages to
migrate to testing.
Thanks,
Joachim
--
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: F0FBF51F
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 18.05.2014, 20:04 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
What’s left to happen is:
* FTP-Master needs to act on
http://bugs.debian.org/748514
http://bugs.debian.org/747175
http://bugs.debian.org/747176
Two have been done, leaves https://bugs.debian.org/748514 (removal
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 16.05.2014, 23:42 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
What’s left to do now?
I found that diagrams no longer builds on non-TH-architectures, removal
requested from the FTP team.
Judging from
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=pkg-haskell-maintainers
Hi,
the next round of Haskell transitions to testing should be possible soon
(everything is fine on amd64 modulo two removals by the FTP team), and
I’m trying to get an overview about remaining issues on other arches.
In theory https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html
should be
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 29.04.2014, 16:27 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
According to dak rm -R -n haskell-tls-extra this blocked by left over
packages depending on it on sparc. The root of the cause is a failure of
haskell-tls to build on sparc:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg
Hi everyone,
one of the current Haskell release transitions blocker is the removal of
some obsolete Haskell libraries, in particular haskell-tls-extra
(https://bugs.debian.org/741230).
According to dak rm -R -n haskell-tls-extra this blocked by left over
packages depending on it on sparc. The
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 16:18 +0100 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Control: block -1 with 735891 701302 719382
Joachim, can you schedule binNMUs where neccessary?
not sure if I’m eligible; I got a (socially, not technical) restricted
access to wanna-build to do the binNMUs required after
Hi,
moving this to the list, as I assume it was not meant personally.
Am Sonntag, den 26.01.2014, 23:45 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 21:28:37 +, James Cowgill wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 00:20 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
But how does that relate to github-backup? It is a program, not a
library, and thus has no difficult dependencies into the Haskell world.
I believe you just have to issue the binNMUs and tomorrow the
github-backup line in
Hi,
Am Montag, den 27.01.2014, 00:27 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
I can read britney output just fine, I just don't touch haskell stuff
as far as binNMUs because everything seems to be uninstallable all the
time and I don't know if you or anybody else is keeping track of your
packages and of
Dear Megaf,
Am Samstag, den 25.01.2014, 10:59 -0200 schrieb Megaf:
Hi all. I was wondering why there's no Flightgear for Wheezy, then I
found out this.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2012/11/msg01284.html
The thing is, all those bugs are all fixed now.
Bellow a short chat I
Dear everyone interested,
Am Mittwoch, den 01.01.2014, 16:56 +0100 schrieb Andreas Barth:
16:32 aurel32 couldn't the dependency of haskell be handled in a better way
16:32 aurel32 some packages are already at the 3rd binNMU in 3 days
16:32 aurel32 some packages are binNMUed the day after
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 08.11.2013, 17:23 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier:
ghc along with a lot of other haskell packages migrated today and the
transition is now complete.
Thanks to you!
We still need to know what to do about haskell-src-exts and mips,
mipsel, sparc: The package usually does not
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 07.11.2013, 12:33 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier:
Futhermore, I am
aware of 8 packages that are currently to young to migrate on their
own[1] - these have all been aged to 5 days. If I have missed a package
(in either case), please let me know.
That list should probably
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 16.08.2013, 17:29 +0200 schrieb Giovanni Mascellani:
Hi.
@Release team: Joachim Breitner asked to patch PTS so that it displays
^-- should be Joachim Reichel
[..]
Il 22/06/2013 12:20, Joachim Reichel ha scritto:
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release team,
ghc has started to reproducible fail to build from source on s390x, due
to some kind of dead-locking of the runtime when lots of processes are
spawned (which happens more likely when
Dear release team,
after the breakdown of ries, there is no regular run of SAT-Britney any
more. I could re-create the setup on coccia, but before I invest time
there I was wondering if this would actually be useful to you, or not.
Also I believe (but have not verified yet) that it can now be
+
+ * debian/patches/escape-window-titles.patch:
+Escape dzen markup and remove xmobar tags from window titles by default.
+Fixes possible malicous code execution. Thanks to Raúl Benencia for
+noticing and Adam Vogt for fixing. CVE-2013-1436
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
/changelog 2012-01-17 22:08:50.0 +0100
+++ libnss-myhostname-0.3/debian/changelog 2013-05-29 20:06:49.0 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+libnss-myhostname (0.3-5~deb7u1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * Ignore link-local addresses (Closes: #705900)
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Wed, 29
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 24.05.2013, 01:18 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 23:18:41 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.05.2013, 16:51 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
I'd like to have the switch to libffi6 (#667906) sorted before that, if
possible
link-local addresses
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Tue, 21 May 2013 15:43:56 +0200
+
libnss-myhostname (0.3-4) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix Package's description to reflect changed behaviour. (Closes: #656218)
diff -Nru libnss-myhostname-0.3/debian/.git-dpm libnss-myhostname-0.3
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 22.05.2013, 20:16 +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 22-05-13 12:53, Joachim Breitner wrote:
The fix is uploaded to unstable, and the debdiff attached.
Just a note on your debdiff. It contains several spurious differences
(e.g. .git-dpm and refreshed patches without code
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 11:24 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
Am 13.05.2013 17:18, schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi,
just wondering if we can help with the Debian side of this transition. I
guess that all Haskell packages need to be rebuild in unstable. If you
want, I can
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 15.05.2013, 11:53 +0200 schrieb Matthias Klose:
Am 15.05.2013 11:29, schrieb Joachim Breitner:
I’m not sure what there is left to be done: The authors of GHC have
indicated that it possibly unsafe to remove these dependencies¹, and the
risk of broken packages at our
Hi,
just wondering if we can help with the Debian side of this transition. I
guess that all Haskell packages need to be rebuild in unstable. If you
want, I can schedule the binNMUs and take care of any build failures. Or
are you waiting with rebuilding Haskell for a reason?
Greetings,
Joachim
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 08.05.2013, 16:51 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 12:29:00 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
The Haskell team has staged the newest version of GHC (7.6.3) together
with lots of library upgrades in experimental, but we’d like to move out
Hi Release team,
thanks for the release!
Am Sonntag, den 05.05.2013, 02:16 +0100 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
As for Squeeze, we'd ask that you co-ordinate particularly large
transitions or changes; if your plans involve major toolchain changes or
otherwise have the potential to cause problems in
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 29.03.2013, 11:31 + schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
haskell-certificate migrated in this morning's britney run,
great! Thanks to all involved.
along with
a bunch of other packages including haskell-warp-tls but /not/
haskell-warp due to the active unblock being for -2.
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.03.2013, 23:13 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
The missing builds are due to some not yet debugged interaction between
the test suite and the buildd environment. The test suit fails
unreliably with “send: resource vanished (Broken pipe)”. Probably
network related
Dear Steven,
Am Donnerstag, den 28.03.2013, 22:18 + schrieb Steven Chamberlain:
I've been watching progress of the haskell package rebuilds on:
http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/haskell.html#header22
That page shows that haskell-yesod-default still Build-Depends
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, den 27.03.2013, 20:52 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 18:26:43 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
plus a few builds (e.g. haskell-warp-tls) to finish.
Depends: haskell-warp-tls/mips haskell-warp (not considered)
Depends: haskell-warp-tls/amd64 haskell
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 11:53 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 18:26:43 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Judging from this, we need at least
unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
unblock haskell-yesod-auth/1.0.2.1-2
(these only change the Build-Depends field
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 16:49 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 23.03.2013, 11:53 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 18:26:43 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Judging from this, we need at least
unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
Control: retitle -1 unblock haskell-authenticate/1.2.1.1-2
haskell-yesod-auth/1.0.2.1-2
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 20:06 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 15:30:28 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 10:04 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 16:51:52 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
This is trying to get #701593
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 21.03.2013, 15:47 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 15:30:28 +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
thanks for testing. haskell-unordered-containers-0.2.2.1 was never meant
for wheezy; the upload to unstable was accidentally. I guess I’ll have
to upload
in libghc-blaze-builder-conduit-dev
+dependency
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Mon, 11 Mar 2013 16:48:11 +0100
+
+haskell-http-conduit (1.4.1.6-2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Allow strange version in libghc-blaze-builder-conduit-dev dependency
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome
Hi release team,
Am Sonntag, den 10.03.2013, 15:02 -0400 schrieb Joey Hess:
Can someone get the packages updated with these patches and the binnmus
scheduled?
thanks to Joey for the patches, preparing packages right now.
This will require binNMUing the reverse dependencies of
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 03.03.2013, 17:11 +0100 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
CC'ing the maintainers+uploader of the affected, plus the reporter for
comments on this. Do any of you feel you would be able to write a patch
for it that could be included in Wheezy or ...?
I don’t think I’ll find
Hi Haskell Group,
looks like for a change we have some real development work, or have to
drop haskell-tls-extra from wheezy (which would also remove large chunks
of yesod):
Am Sonntag, den 03.03.2013, 10:53 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier:
On 2013-03-03 10:07, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Please
Control: severity -1 important
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 29.01.2013, 17:03 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 07:11:57PM +0100, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 27.01.2013, 15:09 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
Do we have any hope of progress on this RC bug? Otherwise it's
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 27.01.2013, 15:09 + schrieb Steve McIntyre:
Do we have any hope of progress on this RC bug? Otherwise it's
incredibly tempting to push for removal of libghc-warp-dev considering
its tiny popcon and the fact that it has never been in a stable Debian
release...
I’m
+0.4.6.
+
+ -- Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:26:26 +0100
+
haskell-tls-extra (0.4.6-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version.
diff -Nru haskell-tls-extra-0.4.6/debian/patches/pretend-lower-version haskell-tls-extra-0.4.6.1/debian/patches/pretend-lower-version
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear release team,
the future of the game “Nikki and the robots” is unclear, and it is not
in testing. Hence, some Haskell libraries that were
Hi,
Am Sonntag, den 04.11.2012, 13:11 +0100 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 22:11:42 +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote:
@release-team: There is a reportedly grave bug with haskell-warp, and a
fix is available. Unfortunately, the route of updating testing via
unstable is broken
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.10.2012, 18:50 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Sonntag, den 28.10.2012, 00:14 +0900 schrieb YOSHINO Yoshihito:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 11:40 PM, Joachim Breitner nome...@debian.org
wrote:
I see. Can you elaborate on the severity of the problem? Do such request
Hi release team / wb maintainers,
here at ICFP I feel a slight push to upload updated Haskell packages for
Debian. Now as we are in the freeze I am not supposed to do that into
unstable, as only stuff that I want to enter wheezy should go into
unstable until the release (that’s right, isn’t it?).
Dear release team,
Am Montag, den 16.07.2012, 20:55 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
Am Montag, den 09.07.2012, 15:32 +0200 schrieb Joachim Breitner:
So we need another pandoc upload removing the use of the threaded
runtime (Jonas?), then apply for a freeze exception and then get pandoc
1 - 100 of 319 matches
Mail list logo
