Bug#1007222: transition: onetbb

2022-03-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Mon, 14 Mar 2022 02:30:08 +0100 Matthias Klose wrote: > > > > I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux > > developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And > > some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as > > a result. I guess we can take similar measures

Bug#1004435: transition: dart

2022-01-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello! I'm the maintainer of dart, we have a new version in experimental that builds on the previous platforms supported, 6.12.1+dfsg4-8. I've run ratt and the expected dependency,

Bug#1002286: Acknowledgement (transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries)

2022-01-12 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 6:15 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 2022-01-10 17:41:17, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > I have received no negative feedback or blockers in the last 20 days, I'm > > afraid that we can not wait > > much longer

Bug#1002286: Acknowledgement (transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries)

2022-01-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I have received no negative feedback or blockers in the last 20 days, I'm afraid that we can not wait much longer since this bug is blocking others (like Dartsim transition). My plan would be to proceed with the plan in the next few days unless feedback appears in the next 48 hours. Thanks!

Bug#1002286: transition: Gazebo + Ignition libraries

2021-12-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello: The motivation for this bug is to manage the join transition from experimental of the packages corresponding to gazebo and the following ignition/sdformat libraries which are

Bug#998338: transition: urdfdom

2021-11-09 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 9:46 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-11-08 23:03:51, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Control: tags -1 = confirmed > > > > On 2021-11-08 22:41:02 +0100, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > > Hi Sebastian: > > > > > > On Tue, Nov

Bug#998338: transition: urdfdom

2021-11-08 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hi Sebastian: On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 5:39 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Why is liburdfom-tools being renamed? This packages does not contain a > shared library. > > No reason. Good catch. I've uploaded 3.0.0+ds-3 that revert the liburdfdom-tools name change. Run ratt again with this new

Bug#998338: transition: urdfdom

2021-11-02 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team: urdfdom library bumped the SOVERSION from 1.x to 3.x. I've run ratt in the Open Robotics buildfarm: https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/debian-ratt-builder/123/

Bug#996568: transition: fcl

2021-10-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team: I'm the maintainer of fcle, upstream has released 0.7.0 version some weeks ago. We have 0.7.0-2 in experimental, it builds in all arches that it did before (hppa

Bug#994416: transition: urdfdom

2021-10-04 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 6:10 PM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > The automatically generated tracker at > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-console-bridge.html > detects more reverse dependencies. Do those also build fine with the new > version of console-bridge? > Thanks Sebastian

Bug#994416: transition: urdfdom

2021-09-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team: I'm the maintainer of console-bridge package, upstream has released 1.0 version some weeks ago. We have 1.0.1+dfsg2-2 in experimental, it builds in all arches:

Bug#933094: transition: octomap

2019-07-26 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a transition of octomap. It is in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built previously. Ben file: title =

Bug#918750: transition: simbody

2019-01-14 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
019 21:13, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-5 has been uploaded to unstable. > > It is failing on mips as some tests are timing out. > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=simbody > > Cheers, > Emilio > > > > > On Thu, Jan

Bug#918750: transition: simbody

2019-01-12 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-5 has been uploaded to unstable. On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:30 PM Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > Hello Emilio: > > There were a couple of patches: one to fix the architecture detection > which fixed most of the BSD and ppc friends. The other, as you said, is not > p

Bug#918750: transition: simbody

2019-01-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
and seems to be happy: https://build.osrfoundation.org/job/debian-ratt-builder/19/consoleFull#console-section-8 Thanks, Jose. On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 1:58 PM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 10/01/2019 12:16, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > On W

Bug#918750: transition: simbody

2019-01-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 10:11 AM Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 09/01/2019 01:27, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear rel

Bug#918750: transition: simbody

2019-01-08 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team: simbody 3.6.1+dfsg-1 is now in experimental, we can start the transition for the existing package in the archive currently using it. The following source package need

Bug#890935: transition: console-bridge

2018-02-24 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
uploaded to unstable. On 23 Feb 2018 13:51, "Emilio Pozuelo Monfort" <po...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 23/02/18 12:14, Jose Luis Rivero wrote: > > On 23/02/18 10:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> > >>> P

Bug#890935: transition: console-bridge

2018-02-23 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
On 23/02/18 10:13, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> >> Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all >> architectures. > > First you need to upload console-bridge to unstable. Before doing that, have > you > tested that those packages build fine with the new console-bridge? > I

Bug#890935: transition: console-bridge

2018-02-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team: console-bridge 0.4.0 is now in experimental, we can start the transition for the existing packages to the archive currently using console-bridge. The following source

Bug#767085: unblock: pcl/1.7.2-2

2014-10-28 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
(x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=ca_ES.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ca_ES.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- Jose Luis Rivero jriv...@osrfoundation.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject