Hi Andi,
On Wednesday, 10 May 2006, you wrote:
there were some requests, e.g. by Martin Michlmayr to the release team
whether we could switch gcc to 4.1 or not for etch. As we're heading to
I know, tbm tried to build all packages on mips*. It would be intersting
to know, how other
Dear Bastian Blank,
The attached patch is a port of my original patch to the version in
sarge.
diff -u grub-0.95+cvs20040624/debian/changelog
grub-0.95+cvs20040624/debian/changelog
--- grub-0.95+cvs20040624/debian/changelog
+++ grub-0.95+cvs20040624/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
Hi Filipus,
Hum, if 1000-2 is accepted and I understand correctly that 5.8.4-8sarge4
won't make it in r2, does that mean that #360900 will propagate to r2?
Perl 5.8.4-8sarge4 wi enter r2 with the point release.
OK, I somehow expected this answer, but your draft refers to this page
and the
Hi,
On Friday, 14 Apr 2006, you wrote:
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060414 17:14]:
* Andreas Barth ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060412 11:07]:
as we're now directly moving towards sarge r2, we drafted an
announcement. Please see the attachement for more details. We will
notify you as
Hi Kevin,
On another topic, why isn't wzdftpd (DSA 1006) included in the release
announcement? It is listed as OK on the wiki page
http://wiki.debian.org/DebianReleases/PointReleases
but not listed at all on the release preparation page
Hi Frank,
On Sunday, 09 Apr 2006, you wrote:
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 05:58:17PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
fai stable2.8.4all source
fai updates 2.8.4sarge1 all source
Fixes three problems
This explanation should probably be more verbose
Hi Cyril,
On Monday, 03 Apr 2006, you wrote:
(FYI: running sarge with security upgrades, without proposed-updates, on
i386)
When trying to upgrade to the latest libapache2-request-perl
(2.04-dev-1sarge2)
I've got a broken dep on perl = 5.8.4-8sarge4, but perl 5.8.4-8sarge3 only
is
Hi Andi,
On Monday, 27 Mar 2006, you wrote:
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060324 16:00]:
Looks like just rebuilding the security version resolves that error, for
whatever reason. Julien and me just cross checked that and got the same
result.
If noone minds we reupload tar
Hi mollo,
On Sunday, 19 Mar 2006, you wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:19:58 +0100
using tar 1.14-2.1
fw:/home/mathieu# tar --rmt-command=/usr/sbin/rmt -cvf
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz' /etc tar:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/mathieu/test.tgz: Cannot open: Input/output
error tar:
Hi Aurelien,
Changes:
glibc (2.3.2.ds1-22sarge1) stable; urgency=low
.
* Lionel Elie Mamane [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
- debian/patches/90_glibc232-timezones.dpatch: Update to tzdata2006b.
Could you please reupload and include a fix for #314408 [1]. This has been
discussed[2] on
Hi Aurelien,
Done in version 2.3.2.ds1-22sarge2.
When do you expect this version will reach Sarge?
We release Debian Sarge r2 when it's ready.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brendan,
Changes:
perl (5.8.4-8sarge4) stable; urgency=low
.
* Don't generate broken md5sums for libperl5.8 (closes: #354466).
* Preserve timestamps in /usr/share/doc.
* Fix problem with utf8/taint interaction (thanks to Steinar
Gunderson for analysis/patch).
.
*
Hi Julien,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
By the way, the packages was marked has missing for arm on the wiki, I
don't know what it means since according to the buildd log[2], it was
built.
Mea culpa, its sparc and not arm that is missing.
you can check that if you run madison on
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three
ABI changing security fixes, so the ABI will be bumped. I can't speak
for d-i.
i had some
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three
ABI changing security fixes, so the
Hi Roger,
On Friday, 10 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Dear stable release manager,
The following patch is a fix for a serious problem with the stable
release of devmapper.
Please go ahead and upload.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Hi Joey,
there was some discussion[1] wether the next stable update could have some
timezone data updated in the glibc package.
Greetings
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-volatile/2006/02/msg0.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hi Joey,
please also update base-config.
#154482 is still valid for sarge, and is very annoying.
Greetings
Martin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Martin,
On Friday, 25 Mar 2005, Martin 'Joey' Schulze wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 04:09:42PM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
Absolutely. It's bound to happen again. We also need to figure out
how to do driver updates during sarge's lifetime. I suspect
Hi Andreas,
On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote:
Hi,
some more questions:
What would be the issue with installing an 32bit-kernel for
dist-upgrades? (If this is a silly idea, please tell me.)
i did not test it. should i?
I also don't think it's a good idea to install a 32bit-kernel.
Hi Matthew,
On Tuesday, 30 Nov 2004, you wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:19:21PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
Well, IIRC, it is enough to use _only_ the 32bit kernel, and that would
make it easier for us, because we don't need an extra package in the
archive. But yes, your reason is also
Hi,
at the BSP last weekend we tried to dist-upgrade on a HPPA64 (HP C360,
PA8000 Processor). Dist-upgrade does not work smoothly, but one can work
around the problems.
libc6 on HPPA64 depends on a kernel newer than the supplied standard
kernel on woody for HPPA64. Installing a newer kernel
Hi all,
at the German LinuxWorldExpo last week we talked about organizing a BSP
end of November (we thought of 27. - 28. November, which is the last
weekend in November).
Location is not yet defined, but Frankfurt might be a good idea.
I would like to hear from Debian QA and Debian Release if a
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.helas.net or http://mhelas.blogspot.com
GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0
.
Please don't CC me, I am reading the lists I am posting to.
signature.asc
Description
connectivity of our university had some problems on weekend. so here comes the
result:
You need to recompile pwlib, openh323 and GM.
Hope that helps.
Greetings
Martin.
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.helas.net or http
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
question about a removal from testing:
openmosix
It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
Actually, I was working on that already (well
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote:
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:33:25AM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Christoph Ulrich Scholler wrote:
Hi,
On Thu Aug 26, 2004 at 12:03:53 +0200, I wrote:
As you suggested, I'll try to recompile both PWLib and openh323 with
binutils_2.14.90.0.7-5
to be another version by all means?
sorry, for that, my knowlege of GM and binutils is not good enough. i think, its
now time for binutils maintainer to step in.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.helas.net or http
,
downgrading binutils from 2.15-1 to 2.14.90.0.7-5 also requires using
the sarge-version of the compilers (gcc-3.3: 3.3.4-6sarge1 instead of
3.3.4-9).
Looks like we tracked down the problem to either binutils or gcc in sid.
The former seems to me more likely.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas
should investigate on that. as i am not very firm in that, i might
be wrong.
if you want me to compile a new version of GM on hppa without uploading a new
one to debian, just drop me a mail containing a link where to fetch the new
source.
Greetings
Martin
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED
)
mps
mosix
--
Martin Zobel-Helas [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.helas.net or http://mhelas.blogspot.com
GPGKey-Fingerprint: 14744CACEF5CECFAE29E2CB17929AB90F7AC3AF0
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Stephen Frost wrote:
* Martin Zobel-Helas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
question about a removal from testing:
openmosix
It has longstanding RC bug (#232810). No direct reaction from maintainer.
Actually, I was working on that already (well, that issue was fixed, I
was trying to fix
201 - 232 of 232 matches
Mail list logo
