Bug#926455: mail_autoremovals: incorrect version number in email warning

2020-08-17 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Package: release.debian.org Followup-For: Bug #926455 Hi, I also ran into this today. To me, it seems the observable problem is not so much an incorrect version number in the email warning, but the fact that the email warning is sent out at pretty much exactly the moment the autorm for a package

Bug#924428: unblock: grfcodec/6.0.6-3

2019-03-12 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Grohne for suggesting this fix (Closes: #922625) + + -- Matthijs Kooijman Tue, 12 Mar 2019 22:19:01 +0100 + grfcodec (6.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium * [4dce67c] Bump debhelper version to v11 diff -Nru grfcodec-6.0.6/debian/patches/endian_check_cpp_abort_on_ftbfs.patch grfcodec-6.0.6/debian

Bug#894159: OpenTTD, icu and ParagraphLayout

2018-05-01 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi László, > > So you're saying I could upload OpenTTD now, and it will be recompiled > > with icu60 once that is uploaded to Sid? Or should I wait a few days? > Well, the transition update and _maybe_ the real start is hours soon. But > as I see, OpenTTD might be uploaded and built, installed

Bug#894159: OpenTTD, icu and ParagraphLayout

2018-04-30 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi László, > > First off: I have a pending new upstream version of OpenTTD that I'd > > like to upload, but I don't want to interfere with this transition. > > Should I hold it off, or do we expect that resolving these issues will > > take a while and should I just upload it now (and have it

Bug#894159: OpenTTD, icu and ParagraphLayout

2018-04-29 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi folks, I'm the maintainer of the OpenTTD package, and stumbled on this bug report, which refers to my package as the last user of the ParagraphLayout API in icu. First off: I have a pending new upstream version of OpenTTD that I'd like to upload, but I don't want to interfere with this

Bug#730783: pu: openttd/1.2.1-3 opu: openttd/1.0.4-7 (Fix for CVE-2013-6411)

2013-12-08 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
On Fri, 2013-11-29 at 15:35 +0100, Matthijs Kooijman wrote: upstream developers for the openttd package have identified a remote denial-of-service (program crash) in the openttd game. They have made patches available, which I'd like to include in wheezy and squeeze. [...] Attached

Bug#730783: pu: openttd/1.2.1-3 opu: openttd/1.0.4-7 (Fix for CVE-2013-6411)

2013-11-29 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
] Fix CVE-2013-6411 (Denial of service using forcefully +crashed aircrafts). See http://security.openttd.org/en/CVE-2013-6411 +for details. + + -- Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl Fri, 29 Nov 2013 12:11:14 +0100 + openttd (1.0.4-6) stable-security; urgency=high * [9ca1ffd] Improve

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

2012-08-24 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi Steven, thanks for your comments. the intent was to include version 1.2.2, I only included the debdiff for 1.2.1 since the final 1.2.2 release had not happened at that time. It has now, so I'm preparing an updated debdiff right now. In which case perhaps you could attach a new debdiff?

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

2012-08-17 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi folks, I've attached debdiffs for both of the proposed options for review. I hate to nag, but upstream has released version 1.2.2 yesterday and I'd like to start packaging either option. Could someone have another look at this? Upstream has made no further changes to 1.2.2 relative to

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

2012-08-17 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi Raphael, FWIW, I saw no debdiff on the list and there's no debdiff in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683376 either. Are you sure you sent it to 683...@bugs.debian.org ? Weird. It's really in my sent box, but it never ended up at bugs.d.o apparently. I'll resend the mail

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

2012-08-17 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi, Weird. It's really in my sent box, but it never ended up at bugs.d.o apparently. I'll resend the mail in a minute. Apparently that didn't work either. My STMP logs show that bugs-master accepted the resent message this morning, but then it got lost. I'll contact the postmaster about that.

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

2012-08-17 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
This is a resend of an earlier message that really didn't want to make it through to the Debian servers. I've uploaded the debdiffs and changelog here instead of attaching them: http://www.stdout.nl/static/tmp/openttd-debdiffs/ Original message follows --- Hi folks, I've attached debdiffs for

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

2012-07-31 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package openttd. Recently, upstream developers have discovered a security problem in most versions of OpenTTD, including the one in testing. For squeeze/stable, a fixed

Bug#683376: unblock: openttd/1.2.2-1 or openttd/1.2.1-2

2012-07-31 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi Niels, We cannot really make this decision without knowing what we are looking at. Please include a debdiff for each option showing the differences between the version in testing and the version that option would provide. Ok, I'll do so as soon as upstream releases the 1.2.2 RC1, which

Re: OpenTTD in Squeeze

2010-09-27 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hey folks, nforenum/4.0.0+debian1-1 grfcodec/1.0.0+debian1-2 openttd-openmsx/0.3.1-1 openttd/1.0.4-1 For the record, these have been unblocked. Awesome, thanks! Matthijs signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: OpenTTD in Squeeze

2010-09-24 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi Julien, So that's: nforenum/4.0.0+debian1-1 grfcodec/1.0.0+debian1-2 openttd-openmsx/0.3.1-1 openttd/1.0.4-1 Yes, exactly that. Thanks, Matthijs signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: OpenTTD in Squeeze

2010-09-20 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
/~rubidium/debian/ Regards, Matthijs Kooijman and Remko Bijker [1] http://devs.openttd.org/~rubidium/debian/openttd_1.0.3-1.0.4-no_lang_or_grf.diffstat.txt [2] http://devs.openttd.org/~rubidium/debian/openttd_1.0.3-1.0.4-no_lang_or_grf.diff [3] http://devs.openttd.org/~rubidium/debian/openttd_1.0.3

Bug#579850: pu: package openttd/0.6.2-1+lenny2

2010-05-01 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
://security.openttd.org/ for details. +- CVE-2010-0401 (Access restriction circumvention, remote crash) +- CVE-2010-0402 (Denial of service via improperly validated + commands) +- CVE-2010-0406 (Denial of service (server) via leaking file + descriptors) + + -- Matthijs Kooijman

Bug#579850: pu: package openttd/0.6.2-1+lenny2

2010-05-01 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#562096: pu: package openttd/0.6.2-1+lenny1

2009-12-24 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +openttd (0.6.2-1+lenny1) stable; urgency=low + + * Backport upstream r18462 to fix remote crash vulnerability +CVE-2009-4007. + + -- Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl Wed, 23 Dec 2009 23:08:48 +0100 + openttd (0.6.2-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream

Bug#562096: pu: package openttd/0.6.2-1+lenny1

2009-12-22 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
this fixed package? Gr. Matthijs diff -u openttd-0.6.2/debian/control openttd-0.6.2/debian/control --- openttd-0.6.2/debian/control +++ openttd-0.6.2/debian/control @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Matthijs Kooijman matth...@stdin.nl Uploaders: Jordi Mallach jo...@debian.org -Build

Re: Bits from the release team: Release goals, schedule, state of the union

2009-08-26 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Heya, - New source package format: Make it possible to build all packages using dpkg source format 3.0 (quilt). This seems like something that requires packagers to take some action, or at least check their packages for this possibility? However, I've never heard about this new source

Re: Bits from the release team: Release goals, schedule, state of the union

2009-08-26 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:21:00AM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: You missed something: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2008/04/msg4.html On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:18:05AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: You missed several announces on debian-devel-announce (you are

Please unblock openttd/0.6.3-1

2008-10-03 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
of the game, leaving only the single player option. Even though this update is a new upstream release, it is a bugfix-only release. Upstream has no release plans in the near future, so 0.6.3 should remain a good version for some time. Thanks, Matthijs Kooijman signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Please allow openttd-0.6.2-1 into testing

2008-08-14 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
Hi RM's, As soon as it is in, I'll give you a heads up. Thijs Kinkhorst has been so kind to upload the new version. Gr. Matthijs signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Please allow openttd-0.6.2-1 into testing

2008-08-12 Thread Matthijs Kooijman
. Gr. Matthijs Kooijman [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493714 [2]: http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=openttd [3]: http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2008/08/msg00212.html signature.asc Description: Digital signature