Bug#872293: nmu: loads of golang stuff

> What's outdated here, built-using? If so, we rebuild those before or during > the > freeze. Not sure we need to do it more often than that, as things will get out > of date again before the freeze. Due to the way golang binaries get built, not rebuilding them outside of freeze results in

Bug#872293: nmu: loads of golang stuff

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: pkg-go-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org thanks Howdy, release! Due to the way that Go packages are built, I've started keeping an eye on packages that were built using an

Re: [pkg-golang-devel] Bug#860608: Bug#860608: Bug#860608: golang: FTBFS: Go version is "go1.6.1", ignoring -next /<>/api/next.txt

On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 4:23 AM, Michael Hudson-Doyle wrote: > As you can see these are all -dev packages, so the Built-Using is bogus and > should simply be dropped from the package. > > There are quite a few more packages that reference obsolete golang packages > in

Bug#781554: RM: docker.io -- RoM; release cycle is too fast for stable

-- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag/conduct-statement.txt signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#774737: unblock: libjpeg9/1:9a-2

a large red swirl here. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to 774737-unsubscr...@bugs.debian.org. -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http

Bug#770902: unblock: docker.io/1.3.2~dfsg1-1

-6407 and CVE-2014-6408. This is a hotfix branch, and the majority of the debdiff is code added to the test suite to ensure a complete fix. Thanks! Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87

Bug#770902: erm

Clearly, by not attaching the patch that means there are no bugs (attached for real now) Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org | Proud Debian Developer : :' : 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~paultag `- http

Bug#768071: unblock: docker.io/1.3.1~dfsg1-1

On Tue, Nov 04, 2014 at 06:13:46PM +, Tianon Gravi wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Just as a note for the release team - this is a bugfix only changeset, and although this looks like a big change, 1.3.0 has

Bug#699050: updated debdiff

Thanks for the quick response, Adam! On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 02:29:15PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 14:06 -0500, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: I've incuded a fix for RC bug 681426. New debdiff attached. +syslinux-themes-debian (11-1.1

Bug#699050: updated debdiff

hello, release team, I've incuded a fix for RC bug 681426. New debdiff attached. Thanks, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -Nru

Bug#689555: unblock: sauerbraten-wake6/1.0-1.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock please unblock package sauerbraten-wake6 updating fixes rc bug #685958 unblock sauerbraten-wake6/1.0-1.1 the shamefully small diff is attached. diff -u

Bug#689556: unblock: kic/2.4a-1.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock please unblock package kic updating fixes rc bug #685959 unblock kic/2.4a-1.1 the shamefully small diff is attached. -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian

Bug#689557: unblock: textedit.app/4.0+20061029-3.4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock please unblock package textedit.app updating fixes rc bug #675220 unblock textedit.app/4.0+20061029-3.4 the shamefully small diff is attached. -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul

Bug#688485: unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1

On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 06:10:41PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Sat, 2012-09-22 at 23:37 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Please unblock package syslinux-themes-debian Updating this fixes bugs #688272 and #681426, as well as finishes (so far as we know

Bug#688485: unblock: syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1

in their own packaging. unblock syslinux-themes-debian/12-1.1 The diff is attached from 12-1, but binary files are not represented. Special thanks to Mika Pflüger, who did most of the work here. Thanks, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R

Re: Towards d-i wheezy beta 3

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 12:07:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hello, tiny wrap-up for beta 2: the release happened one week after the prospective date. Some tiny delays on various fronts added up and explain that, but the overall results don't seem too bad to me. That's why I'm going to

Bug#685657: unblock: desktop-base/7.0.3

-- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -Nru desktop-base-7.0.2/debian/changelog desktop-base-7.0.3/debian/changelog --- desktop-base-7.0.2/debian

Bug#683235: unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2012-07-30 03:21, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Subject: unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package

Bug#683351: unblock: desktop-base/7.0.2

APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian

Bug#683234: unblock: desktop-base/7.0.1

really that resolution. (Closes: #679306) * Fix typo in plymouth theme. (Closes: #679357) * Updated ink-splated kde wallpaper, to fix alignment issues. . [ Paul Tagliamonte ] * Add ${misc:Depends} to the Depends for the binary package. We're using debhelper, so we should behave

Bug#683235: unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2

Subject: unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package datapacker I've NMU'd this package to fix RC bug #629774. Diff attached. unblock datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2 -- System

Bug#683235: diff attached

Forgot to include the patch. Attached. Thanks, Paul -- .''`. Paul Tagliamonte paul...@debian.org : :' : Proud Debian Developer `. `'` 4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352 D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87 `- http://people.debian.org/~paultag diff -Nru datapacker-1.0.1+nmu1/debian/changelog

Re: The status of desktop-base in wheezy

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:25:52PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (22/06/2012): On 21.06.2012 21:08, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: As many of you know, we're tragically close to freeze. As a result, the usual process of voting, debating and picking

Re: Please binNMU fluxbox

Hello, During my upload of fluxbox 1.3.2, I accidentally built the amd64 .deb that was uploaded to ftp-master on Ubuntu, not Debian. In order to prevent any issues regarding versioned libraries, as well as fix the themes that are shipped in the package, I'd like to request a binNMU against

Please binNMU fluxbox

-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20111031130742.ga18...@lucifer.pault.ag

Re: (future unblock) RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)

On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:29 AM, Richard Laager rlaa...@wiktel.com wrote: On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 10:52 +0530, Bhavani Shankar R wrote: as the README says its safe to update the package at any stage. Isn't this basically the same as saying, We don't introduce bugs in our software.? If they put

Re: (future unblock) RFS: mobile-broadband-provider-info (updated package)

FWIW, this package was unblocked a few times already, IIRC. I think Paul Wise sponsored one of them, unless I'm going crazy ( which there Sorry for the quick double post. Here's the thread. pabs uploaded -- http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2010/11/msg00143.html medhi unblocked --