Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-07-08 at 02:24 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > I'd like to update the version of bup in bookworm from 0.33-2 to
> > 0.33.2-1+deb12u1, which incorporates two upstream bugfix releases for
> > a bug deemed important enough by upstream to
angelog 2022-12-26 22:27:53.0 -0500
+++ bup-0.33.2/debian/changelog 2023-07-08 01:17:38.0 -0400
@@ -1,3 +1,50 @@
+bup (0.33.2-1+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium
+
+ * Upstream version 0.33.2, with a fix for a problem that can cause POSIX.1e
+ACLs to be restored incorrectly.
+
+ --
due to the upstream
version number bump).
Thanks.
unblock dnsviz/0.9.3-1
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Nru dnsviz-0.9.2/PKG-INFO dnsviz-0.9.3/PKG-INFO
--- dnsviz-0.9.2/PKG-INFO 2021-02-05 23:49:51.0 -0500
+++ dnsviz-0.9.3/PKG-INFO 2021-03-11 18:03:26.0 -0500
@@ -1
>
> > > On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 17:47 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > > > I would like to fix a DNSSEC validation bug (CVE-2017-15105) in the
> > > > unbound package shipped in stretch. After discussion with the
> > > > security
> > > > t
the implementation of scoped_array in Boost.
> 4) At least check the required porting needs of dependencies to
> protobluff. Ask their maintainers if they want / can do the porting.
> Maybe they know other alternatives.
>
> If these fail and RMs ACK to carry two versions of protobuf then of
> course, do it. Emilio?
> How quick do you need to solve this GitLab update? I guess, quick.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
similar fix has already been shipped for wheezy-lts in
1.4.17-3+deb7u3.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Nru unbound-1.6.0/debian/changelog unbound-1.6.0/debian/changelog
--- unbound-1.6.0/debian/changelog 2017-08-27 00:43:42.0 -0400
+++ unbound-1.6.0/debian
the root zone, and there is only a singular root zone.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 09:19 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: block -1 by 873054
> >
> > On Sun, 2017-08-27 at 01:25 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > > There is a bug in the unbound
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 +confirmed -moreinfo
> >
> > On Thu, 2017-08-24 at 08:55 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > > I forgot to attach the debdiff and rest. So here it is.
> >
> > Please go ahead.
>
&g
his package is
needed for #873371, I've gone ahead and uploaded
dns-root-data/2017072601~deb9u1 on behalf of the pkg-dns team.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 00:38 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > I'd like to update jessie's unbound with a fix for the same RFC 5011
> > issue described in #873371 for stretch, fast-tracked via the *-updates
> > mechanism due to the time component o
svn r4000, "Include root trust anchor id
+20326 in unbound-anchor".
+
+ -- Robert Edmonds <edmo...@debian.org> Mon, 28 Aug 2017 00:17:29 -0400
+
unbound (1.4.22-3+deb8u2) jessie; urgency=medium
* debian/unbound.init: Add "pidfile" magic comment (Closes: #807
trust anchor was
introduced after jessie.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
-2017 to the RFC 5011 "VALID" state. (The
stretch-pu request for the dns-root-data package is #873054.)
Accordingly, the proposed unbound 1.6.0-3+deb9u1 implements a versioned
dependency on the dns-root-data package that would be shipped in
#873054.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debia
Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package dns-root-data
>
> Dear release team,
>
> Robert Edmonds has prepared patch to fix the regression cau
testing and can cause
serious data loss, potentially corrupting a bup backup repository in
certain situations if the 'bup gc' command is used. The source debdiff
is attached.
unblock bup/0.29-3
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Nru bup-0.29/debian/changelog bup-0.29/debian
matches
what is in the source package in the archive, and that the trust anchors
in the package match what is published by IANA at
https://data.iana.org/root-anchors/root-anchors.xml.)
unblock unbound/1.6.0-3
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Nru unbound-1.6.0/debian/changelog
obuf.)
> Also do you have a clue why protobuf FTBFS on build servers? I'm unable to
> reproduce the problem...
I built it on amd64 in an up-to-date sid pbuilder chroot and it failed
in the same manner as it did on all the buildd's.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-07-04 at 16:11 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> > +unbound (1.4.22-3+deb8u2) jessie; urgency=medium
> > +
> > + * debian/unbound.init: Add "pidfile" magic comment (Closes: #807132)
> > + * debian/unbound.init: Call sta
Robert Edmonds wrote:
> Julien Cristau wrote:
> > May I take the opportunity to ask you to also fix the 'stop' action from
> > the init script?
> >
> > We've been using this patch on the debian.org hosts for a year now.
> > Previously restarting the service would
-name $NAME --retry 5; then
> do_resolvconf_stop
> log_end_msg 0
> else
>
> Cheers,
> Julien
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
an/unbound.init: Add "pidfile" magic comment (Closes: #807132)
+
+ -- Robert Edmonds <edmo...@debian.org> Sat, 25 Jun 2016 14:49:31 -0400
+
unbound (1.4.22-3+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium
* iterator/iter_hints.c: Update hints for H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET
diff -Nru unbound-1.4.22/de
Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-02-22 0:09, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
> >index af91f28..2c6d115 100644
> >--- a/debian/changelog
> >+++ b/debian/changelog
> >@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
> >+unbound (1.4.22-3+deb8u1) jessi
)
+
+ -- Robert Edmonds <edmo...@debian.org> Sun, 21 Feb 2016 18:36:43 -0500
+
unbound (1.4.22-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Fix CVE-2014-8602: denial of service by making resolver chase endless
diff --git a/iterator/iter_hints.c b/iterator/iter_hints.c
index 7fa07a7..8e51424 100644
--- a/it
resolver chase endless
+series of delegations; closes: #772622.
+
+ -- Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org Tue, 09 Dec 2014 17:52:08 -0500
+
unbound (1.4.22-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Drop unneeded Build-Dependency on doxygen.
diff -Nru unbound-1.4.22/debian/patches/debian-changes
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
.
There's also #760129 which needs to be fixed for python3-protobuf to
exist.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org
Robert Edmonds wrote:
OK, protobuf 2.6.0-4 with the atomics fix is now in the archive and
built on all architectures. Please give back shogun on mips.
Oh, nevermind, I see shogun was rebuilt on mips against protobuf 2.6.0-4
a few minutes ago.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 14/09/14 00:26, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I see a build failure on mips in the 'shogun' package:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=shogunarch=mipsver=3.2.0-7.2%2Bb1stamp=1410641206
This is actually an architecture+compiler specific
Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
be binNMU'd.
It turns out node
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG exited with status
code 512)
Can you
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
while loading changes
signature (and without a delay of course). You
may
need to dcut the previous upload first.
Funny :-)
https://rt.debian.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=5305
My key was replaced in the mean-time. I'll reupload it with a new
signature.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before
in the protobuf
headers, which will mean another protobuf upload.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140913222654.ga14
but protobuf-c, node-mapnik,
osmium and the 5 packages that don't have the dependencies).
OK, great. Note that I'll be doing a sourceful upload of protobuf-c, so
it probably won't need a binNMU. (Assuming arm64 builds protobuf before
protobuf-c...)
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
that runs the protobuf
compiler during its build should be binNMU'd, otherwise FTBFS issues
could go unnoticed until a new upload or a QA rebuild. But maybe this
is too aggressive. Any advice?
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ
.
(Besides the two packages that already FTBFS for unrelated reasons.)
Thanks for considering my request!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 13/08/14 01:15, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Hi,
I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 12/08/14 03:11, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Hi,
I think the transition is not quite over; there is still #756422, which
blocks #755212. We need a sourceful upload of collectd in order to
rebuild (or possibly remove) the .pb-c.[ch] files in the collectd-dev
(X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101
Icedove/31.0
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1
the only thing left for this transition is
to get an updated collectd with re-generated .pb-c.h files into the
archive.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I have binNMUed collectd and criu. Let me know if there's anything else that
needs binNMUs.
Hi, Emilio:
I don't see binNMUs for collectd or criu. I see collectd at version
5.4.1-3. But a recent criu upload transitioned the package
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
* The header file (protobuf-c.h) which compiled .pb-c.h files must
include. This is shipped in the libprotobuf-c0-dev package
(protobuf-c 1.0.0), or the libprotobuf-c-dev package (protobuf-c
structures get de-referenced. I am fairly sure that the layout of those
structures has not changed in protobuf-c 1.0.0, but I will verify with
abi-compliance-checker.
The ProtobufCMessageDescriptor structures *have* changed, but I don't
think you export those anywhere.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo
Hi, Emilio:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Hi Robert,
On 18/07/14 22:19, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I am requesting an upload slot to upload protobuf-c 1.0.0-1 to unstable.
I am hoping to accomplish a transition to protobuf-c 1.0.0 in time for
the jessie release. (Disclaimer: I am also one
libgadu that we might want to rebase and
apply to upstream libprotobuf-c, but it doesn't look like anything will
break if libgadu is built against the system's protobuf-c.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hi, Gergely:
Gergely Nagy wrote:
Robert Edmonds edmo...@debian.org writes:
riemann-c-client
Rebuilt by hand successfully against protobuf-c 1.0.0~rc2-1 from
experimental.
Has an unversioned build dependency on libprotobuf-c0-dev. This
needs
utilize this file. I would recommend that the upstream developers
ship a .proto file instead.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Npru libgadu-1.12.0.orig/debian/control libgadu-1.12.0/debian/control
--- libgadu-1.12.0.orig/debian/control 2014-06-15 11:39:00.0 +
Helmut Grohne wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:21:03PM -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I've built test binaries from tag debian/1.4.17-3+deb7u1 and they are
available here:
http://people.debian.org/~edmonds/build/unbound/1.4.17-3+deb7u1/
If this looks good to the release team, I
and they are
available here:
http://people.debian.org/~edmonds/build/unbound/1.4.17-3+deb7u1/
If this looks good to the release team, I will be happy to upload to
-pu, no NMU required.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Chris Knadle wrote:
On Monday, February 03, 2014 22:25:23 Robert Edmonds wrote:
I've uploaded protobuf 2.5.0-8 to experimental, which has the exact same
ABI/API as protobuf 2.5.0-5. Can you tell me if the current version of
mumble in the archive works with libprotobuf8 2.5.0-8, once it's
Chris Knadle wrote:
On Friday, January 31, 2014 15:18:18 Robert Edmonds wrote:
[...]
Chris Knadle's input in #737246 makes me believe that the changes in
2.5.0-6 / -7 just aren't correct. I'm thinking we should probably go
back to the approach in 2.5.0-5 (though with a fallback atomic
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:00:35 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 12:00:35 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:19:49 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 16:57:30 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I will upload protobuf 2.5.0-5 to unstable shortly. Is there anything I
need to do to schedule binNMUs of the reverse deps
Hi,
I now have protobuf 2.5.0 building on all architectures in experimental.
(Upstream did some... interesting... things to cause FTBFSes on all but
a few supported architectures.)
Please let me know when I may begin this transition by uploading to
unstable.
Thanks!
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo
Julien Cristau wrote:
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 15:02:53 -0500, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Please let me know when I may begin this transition by uploading to
unstable.
If you're confident binNMUs of the reverse deps will be enough (ie there
were no API changes
|libprotobuf-lite8|libprotoc8/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libprotobuf7|libprotobuf-lite7|libprotoc7/;
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
will need to go via tpu.
debdiff is attached.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -Nru unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog
--- unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog 2012-05-28 14:36:18.0 -0400
+++ unbound-1.4.17/debian/changelog 2013-02-17 12:35
believe there is precedent for
an updated package in stable to update DNS root server hints in [0].)
the debdiff is attached.
[0]
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/b/bind9/current/changelog#version1:9.3.4-2etch2
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
diff -u unbound-1.4.6/debian/changelog
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 14:26:43 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
please allow unbound 1.4.6-1 to migrate to testing. this version fixes
a FTBFS bug (#593039) and contains a number of upstream bug fixes.
I assume the ldns copy isn't used, and you link against
/download.html
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
privileges are dropped (after binding port),
+ # and the given username is assumed. Default is user unbound.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
versions.
what do i need to do to keep vmware-package out of lenny? just file an
RC bug on it or what?
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Adeodato Simó wrote:
Yes, please file an RC bug and let us know the number. We'll remove it
then.
#491509
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it be possible to see this fix in a stable update?
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
tags 390697 + patch
thanks
Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 06:07:55PM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Hi,
(I am not the maintainer.) openvpn in etch randomly crashes on amd64 due
to #390697, a side effect of #394695. It is possible that disabling the
comp-lzo option
://people.debian.org/~edmonds/youtube-dl_etch_lenny.diff
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 04:45:13AM +, Robert Edmonds wrote:
368226 Quagga does intentionally not upgrade automatically
Maintainer forgot to close the bug.
Perhaps you should use a versioned close on this bug, so that the status of
the fix can be tracked
anon-proxy is interesting. It looks like it's been abandoned by the
maintainer and the upstream[0] has rewritten it in Java. Its open bugs
lead me to believe it's not suitable for testing or a release.
[0] http://anon.inf.tu-dresden.de/index_en.html
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On 2007-08-30, Robert Edmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-08-30, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
423823 retchmail: FTBFS: error: there are no arguments to 'cur' that
depend on a template parameter, so a declaration of 'cur' must be available
C++ headers are Turing-complete -- the bug
with #387989 and #423967, and NMU'd wvstreams (#440245).
retchmail will build once wvstreams 4.2.2-2.3 is in the archive.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2007-08-30, Luk Claes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
368226 Quagga does intentionally not upgrade automatically
It looks like the maintainer rewrote the prerm script to fix this but
neglected to note this in the changelog or BTS.
--
Robert Edmonds
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
75 matches
Mail list logo
