zookeeper 3.4.6

2014-11-05 Thread Tim Retout
and I should hold off? I'd totally understand if so, and I'm sorry for leaving this so late. Kind regards, -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive

Re: Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-06 Thread Tim Retout
On 5 August 2011 17:43, Ricardo Mones mo...@debian.org wrote:  I've already orphaned all his packages (was already on the MIA radar). Thanks Ricardo. I will discuss whether yada should be removed on debian-qa. -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ

Re: Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-05 Thread Tim Retout
just clean), and this has been against the RC policy since etch (most likely introduced at a later time than the previous discussion on this bug). So I'm upgrading the severity to serious on those grounds, if there are no objections. -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Re: Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-05 Thread Tim Retout
response from the maintainer, I'll consider the tech-ctte route. Thanks, -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Re: Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-04 Thread Tim Retout
not in the FAQ because not that many people bother to try. Kind regards, -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Re: Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-04 Thread Tim Retout
. This is completely different to debhelper compat versions. Kind regards, -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Re: Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-03 Thread Tim Retout
yada, and increases the risk of unintentional changes. The same problems do not occur with other methods of building packages, because the source packages are not automatically modified. Kind regards, -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ

Re: Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-03 Thread Tim Retout
On 3 August 2011 14:24, Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org wrote: Firstly, the scope of the rewriting is greater than merely the Build-Depends field. By the way, in case there is any doubt that this bug should be RC, turning on automagic use of the equivalent feature in cdbs qualifies for a reject

Release goal proposal: remove yada

2011-08-01 Thread Tim Retout
yada to different systems than it is to fix these problems. I am happy to advocate this goal, and will update the wiki page with a BTS usertag if there is agreement from the release team. Kind regards, -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ

Bug#601563: RM: libnet-nationalrail-livedepartureboards-perl/0.02-1

2010-10-27 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm ROM; please remove from testing. See bug #601553 for why I don't think this should go into a stable release for now. Thanks, Tim -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#601153: unblock: x11vnc/0.9.10-1.1

2010-10-23 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package x11vnc x11vnc (0.9.10-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/control: B-D-I on openjdk-6-jdk rather than B-D on default-jdk. *

Bug#601156: unblock: lwjgl/2.5+dfsg-3

2010-10-23 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package lwjgl lwjgl (2.5+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low . * debian/rules: Update JAVA_HOME to match openjdk-6-jdk build-dependency. (Closes: #599988) unblock

Bug#601158: unblock: cryptonit/0.9.7-2.4

2010-10-23 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cryptonit cryptonit (0.9.7-2.4) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * src/ConfigDatabase.cpp: Apply patch from Stefano Rivera to fix GUI

Bug#600668: unblock: nut/2.4.3-1.1

2010-10-18 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package nut nut (2.4.3-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * drivers/libhid.c: Apply r2407 from upstream to fix bug with some low speed UPS

Bug#600669: unblock: pidgin-sipe/1.9.0-1.1

2010-10-18 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package pidgin-sipe pidgin-sipe (1.9.0-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * src/core/sipe.c: Apply patch from Ubuntu to fix FTBFS. (Closes:

Bug#600366: nmu: sawfish_1:1.5.3-2

2010-10-17 Thread Tim Retout
-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 s390 . -m Rebuild with librep-dev 0.90.2-1.1 -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Bug#600366: nmu: sawfish_1:1.5.3-2

2010-10-17 Thread Tim Retout
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 17:38 +0100, Tim Retout wrote: So, erm, just binNMU it until it works. I'll take a guess at how reportbug would phrase that: And now that I've sent it, I realise that sawfish does FTBFS, unlike rep-gtk, so I actually want give-backs rather than binNMUs, and am probably

Bug#600366: nmu: sawfish_1:1.5.3-2

2010-10-16 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu sawfish_1:1.5.3-2 . ia64 kfreebsd-amd64 kfreebsd-i386 . -m Rebuild with librep-dev 0.90.2-1.1 I checked for other reverse dependencies of librep-dev, and found sawfish is failing on

Bug#600318: unblock: librep/0.90.2-1.1

2010-10-15 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package librep librep (0.90.2-1.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * debian/rules: Set CONFIG_SHELL and run ./configure using /bin/bash

Re: Bug#567770: e16 RC bugs

2010-10-11 Thread Tim Retout
won't the rm -f in the preinst fail? I had vague plans to test this. Take this all with a pinch of salt; it's ridiculous o'clock over here. :) Regards, -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble

Bug#599723: unblock: ettercap/1:0.7.3-2.1

2010-10-10 Thread Tim Retout
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package ettercap ettercap (1:0.7.3-2.1) unstable; urgency=low . * Non-maintainer upload. * 01_pointers_and_ints_dont_mix.diff: Cast to u_char* rather than

Bug#599232: unblock: pkg-config/0.25-1.1

2010-10-05 Thread Tim Retout
compatibility with autoconf (= 2.66). (Closes: #591547) -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org Sun, 03 Oct 2010 17:13:29 +0100 unblock pkg-config/0.25-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental

Bug#594056: future unblock: libdbd-sqlite3-perl/1.29-3

2010-08-25 Thread Tim Retout
On 24 August 2010 23:39, gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:35:19 +0100, Tim Retout wrote: On 24 August 2010 20:49, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote: Ok. Go ahead with the upload and tell us once the package has been accepted. I looked at this: the 'Depends

Bug#594056: future unblock: libdbd-sqlite3-perl/1.29-3

2010-08-24 Thread Tim Retout
) confirm/deny whether this is okay? I've set it back to unreleased in the meantime. -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org

Bug#592515: future unblock: nama/1.064-1 (or -2)

2010-08-15 Thread Tim Retout
files so that ignorant people like me know why that $package has been recommanded. Okay, I'll go this route. I've uploaded this. -- Tim Retout dioc...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas

Bug#556577: pu: package libdbd-mysql-perl/4.007-1+lenny1

2009-11-16 Thread Tim Retout
37027 to stop auto_reconnect option causing +segmentation faults. (Closes: #520406) + + -- Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk Sat, 14 Nov 2009 14:22:31 + + libdbd-mysql-perl (4.007-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ

Re: sbuild bug #395271 on various buildds

2009-08-14 Thread Tim Retout
this bug is obscuring other FTBFS bugs on other architectures. -- Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Re: sbuild bug #395271 on various buildds

2009-08-14 Thread Tim Retout
breaks piuparts)... the Perl team has been talking about whether there are other ways of doing this, but there haven't been any better ideas yet. -- Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: sbuild bug #395271 on various buildds

2009-08-13 Thread Tim Retout
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 11:00 +0100, Tim Retout wrote: I don't know who to talk to to get this fixed. :) dam has now also filed this as bug #541342 against buildd.debian.org... -- Tim Retout t...@retout.co.uk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject

Re: Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show text (2.x implements standard wrong)

2008-12-05 Thread Tim Retout
is then interpreted as hidden text by OO.o 2.x. The reverse problem also occurs; hidden text in documents will be made visible in OO.o 2.x. -- Tim Retout [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Bug#507865: openoffice.org-writer: OOo 2.4.x openinig OOo 3 files doesn't show text (2.x implements standard wrong)

2008-12-05 Thread Tim Retout
documents, the rest of the world is going to have to deal with this problem in any case. Chris is going to talk to Sun today about the problem, I believe. -- Tim Retout [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Please unblock cairo 1.6.4-6

2008-07-05 Thread Tim Retout
Cairo was given back a couple of weeks ago[0], and has now built successfully on arm and alpha. It is stalling 5 packages[1]. [0] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/06/msg00436.html [1] http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?staller=cairo So, just a ping. :) Thanks, -- Tim