Bug#811024: jessie-pu: package imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5

Dear Adam, On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > Essentially, the upload I'm proposing (debdiff to stable attached) > > makes stable and unstable identical, since there were only security > > fixes involved (the

Bug#811024: jessie-pu: package imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5

Hello, On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Vincent Fourmond <fourm...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:49 PM, Vincent Fourmond <fourm...@debian.org> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Adam D. Barratt < >> a...@adam-barratt.or

Bug#811024: jessie-pu: package imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear Release Team, The imagemagick maintainers (mostly Bastien) have prepared a new version of imagemagick for stable that fixes a series of minor security issues that the

Bug#811024: jessie-pu: package imagemagick/8:6.8.9.9-5

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Thu, 2016-01-14 at 22:33 +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > The imagemagick maintainers (mostly Bastien) have prepared a new > > version of imagem

Bug#773649: wheezy-pu: package freecol/0.10.5+dfsg-2

-0.10.5+dfsg/debian/control 2014-12-20 23:57:05.0 +0100 @@ -3,19 +3,19 @@ Priority: optional Maintainer: Debian Games Team pkg-games-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org Uploaders: Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org -Build-Depends: debhelper (= 5), ant, openjdk-6-jdk, cdbs +Build-Depends

Bug#773649: wheezy-pu: package freecol/0.10.5+dfsg-2

On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: [I just spotted that your mail didn't have the bug CCed; was that intentional?] Argh, my mistake. Now Ccing the bug report. On Sun, 2014-12-21 at 15:29 +0100, Vincent Fourmond wrote: No, that was private

Please unblock imagemagick 6.7.7.10-5

Dear release team, Would it be possible to allow imagemagick 6.7.7.10-5 to transition to testing ? It contains fixes for potential DoS vulnerabilities (see bug #692367 and attached debdiff). It seems to me that an unblock request has already been granted for that version, but it was probably

Please unblock webgen0.4 version 0.4.7-8

Dear release team, I've just discovered a nasty interaction that prevents webgen0.4 to start when ruby-coderay is intalled. Although there is no bug reported for that, I'm quite confident that it would be RC. I've just uploaded a pretty minimal fix (debdiff attached). Could you please allow

Please unbock imagemagick 6.7.7.10-4

Dear release team, Could you please unblock imagemagick 6.7.7.10-4 ? It contains a minimal fix (debdiff attached) for fixing a potential DoS vulnerability in testing. Many thanks, Vincent imagemagick-debdiff Description: Binary data

Please unblock imagemagick 8:6.7.7.10-3

Hello, Could you please allow imagemagick 8:6.7.7.10-3 to transition to testing ? It is a minimal fix for a security hole. (debdiff attached). Many thanks, Vincent im.debdiff Description: Binary data

Bug#652650: Advice requested for a security upload of imagemagick to unstable

Dear release team, We have prepared an upload of imagemagick that fixes recently-uncovered security-related problems (#667635). I'm unsure about what to do currently with the imagemagick ongoing transition (#652650). Shall I upload right now with urgency=high, knowing that anyway, it will

Bug#652650: transition: imagemagick

Hello, On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal   Dear Release Team,   The newer imagemagick package just uploaded to unstable (6.7.4.0-1)

Bug#652650: transition: imagemagick

Hello, On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal   Dear Release Team,   The newer imagemagick package just uploaded to unstable (6.7.4.0-1)

Bug#652650: transition: imagemagick

testing is safe again before uploading disruptive changes to unstable, since it will take some time before imagemagick can transition to testing again, won't it ? Cheers, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ His followers called him

Bug#652650: Imagemagick transition, ping again ?

On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: there are a few packages in common with glew and numpy transitions, so I'd appreciate your holding off a little bit more. glew looks almost ready, so we might clean the path shortly. OK, thanks for the information. In

Bug#652650: Imagemagick transition, ping again ?

Hello again, I've checked all packages that build-depend on imagemagick, and they all build fine excepted for cimg that is currently FTBS (see #652770). Are there any reasons to delay the imagemagick transition as of now ? It should really go smoothly. Cheers, Vincent -- To

Bug#652650: Imagemagick transition

Hello, I've rebuilt all the remaining packages (excluding ruby-rmagick and python-magick, that were already checked) against the version of imagemagick in experimental, and everything went fine, excepted for cimg, that fails at the build-dep level: [...] The following packages have unmet

Bug#652650: imagemagick transition: any news ?

Hello, It's been more than a month that we requested permission to proceed with the new imagemagick transition; is there be anything specific that prevents us from uploading the current imagemagick in experimental to unstable ? Thanks, Vincent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#652650: ImageMagick transition

Dear release Team, Any news on the imagemagick transition ? Would it be OK to upload the new version to unstable ? pythonmagick reportedly builds and runs fine with the newer version, so with both bindings fine, it should really be a binNMU-only transition. Cheers, Vincent --

Bug#652650: transition: imagemagick

, Vincent Fourmond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAEnRq5Npx_Q8R+HcFCVx+5BSsBsdFWfRaDaMy6iK3CHp=bc...@mail.gmail.com

Bug#599857: unblock: librmagick-ruby/2.13.1-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: freeze-exception Please unblock package librmagick-ruby: It finally fixes (or, rather, works around) a FTBS on sparc that has been preventing the fix for #591152 to enter testing for ages now

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

Hello, On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 01:24:59AM +0200, Vincent Fourmond wrote:   It's been a month without any activity on this request yet. What time is necessary to safely assume that the request has been refused ? Were

Bug#546365: What about uploading pmount to stable ?

Hello, It's been a month without any activity on this request yet. What time is necessary to safely assume that the request has been refused ? Cheers, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ Donkey: No one told me I had the right

Bug#546365: pu: package pmount/0.9.18-2+lenny1

+++ pmount-0.9.18/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +pmount (0.9.18-2+lenny1) stable-proposed-updates; urgency=medium + + * Import patch from the 0.9.19 release to have pmount working with +kernels without the deprecated sysfs elements (closes: #528404) + + -- Vincent Fourmond fourm...@debian.org Sat

Bug#545538: pu: package pmount/0.9.19-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello, pmount is widely used on many debian systems to allow normal users to mount removable media. However, the current version of pmount in stable cannot work with recent kernels that

Please unblock galeon 2.0.6-2.1

Hello, Could you please unblock galeon 2.0.6-2.1 ? It has a fix for a recently-discovered security problem. Urgency is high, so it should make it to testing before Thursday. Cheers, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ More than any

Please unblock zsnes 1.510-2.2

Hello, Could you please unblock zsnes 1.510-2.2 ? It is a one-line fix for a RC bug in testing. Thanks ! Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ Donkey: No one told me I had the right to remain silent ! Shrek: You *have* the right

Please unblock wordtrans 1.1pre15-3.2

, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ His followers called him Mahasamatman and said he was a god. He preferred to drop the Maha- and the -atman, however, and called himself Sam. -- Roger Zelazny, Lord of Light Vincent, listening to Setting Me Up (Dire

Please unblock pmount 0.9.18-2

Hello, Would you be so kind to unblock pmount 0.9.18-2 ? Changes are pretty minimal and do not touch the code, but they nevertheless fixe a RC bug in lenny. Many thanks, Vincent Fourmond -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ Au royaume des

Please unblock statcvs 1:0.4.0.dfsg-3

Dear release team, Could you please unblock statcvs 1:0.4.0.dfsg-3 ? It drops a dependency on a old and outdated package, libjdom-java (see #502037). As a bonus, the package was made lintian-clean. Thanks, Vincent -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince

Request for unfreeze: libwoodstox-java and freecol

the same as the versions currently in contrib/testing, excepted that they are set up to work correctly with openjdk (and they do). Many thanks, Vincent Fourmond -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Request for unblock: fig2ps

with a switch from gs to ghostscript for dependencies. Could you please let it transition to testing ? Many thanks, Vincent Fourmond -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ The moon was high now, in a sky as black as a cup of coffee that wasn't very black

Request for unfreeze: vamps 0.99.2-2

version. I would be grateful if you considered to add an exception to allow its transition to testing. Regards, Vincent Fourmond -- Vincent Fourmond, Debian Developer http://vince-debian.blogspot.com/ I have always wished for my computer to be as easy to use as my telephone; my wish

Re: Uploading to unstable for an adoption ?

On 3/16/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes, nothing at this point prevents you from uploading this package to unstable. Would the switch to cdbs still be OK if Vincent would request an unblock? Sure, the switch to cdbs would be ok, because we're only unblocking RC bugfixes

Uploading to unstable for an adoption ?

Dear release team, I was wondering if it is reasonable to upload to unstable now for a package adoption ? The package (libintl-gettext-ruby) has a high popcon rate (around 1800), and modifications to the previous (QA) release are rather small (adoption and switch to cdbs and dpatch). Thanks,