Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:extrepo-data
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: bookworm
Severity: normal
Subject: bookworm-pu: package extrepo-data/1.0.5
thanks
[making this an official stable update request; for the full backstory,
please see
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 04:43:45PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:41:57AM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > We can restore lost files in a postinst. For this to work, we must
> > duplicate (e.g. hard link) affected files in the data.tar.
> > Example: #1057220 (systemd-sysv
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 09:06:25PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Wouter,
>
> On 27-02-2023 23:37, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > To be clear: this would require a pass through NEW, for the RDM tester
> > package ("ola-rdm-tester"). That's okay then? If
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi release team!
Since the current state of the freeze, I thought I'd check with you guys
before uploading ola 0.10.9.
A bit of background: there were a few compatibility bugs in ola 0.10.8
(currently in stable) which meant that it was kicked out of
Hi,
I uploaded a fix for two security issues in NBD to unstable yesterday,
but forgot to set the severity to "high".
Please adjust so that the package doesn't need to wait for 5 days.
Thanks,
--
w@uter.{be,co.za}
wouter@{grep.be,fosdem.org,debian.org}
On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 04:08:24PM -0500, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> Control: severity -1 serious
> Control: tags = confirmed
>
> CCing the release team, and CTTE because I don't know who else is
> tracking issues related to the usrmerge effort. I've consciously chosen
> not to pour gasoline on
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gridengine
[ Reason ]
gridengine was blocked on a gcc-10 FTBFS bug. I didn't notice this until
someone pointed it out to me in late January, and then I immediately
On Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 07:19:02PM +0100, Dominik George wrote:
> > If you don't see obstacles, why not start today?
>
> I think I already made those obstacles clear: Starting outside means
> buying,
(or getting donated)
> installing and operating at least a server vor volatile.debian.net
On Thu, Nov 01, 2018 at 08:28:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2018-10-31 at 17:19 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > Would like to fix #876251; minor but very annoying bug in init script
> > means the daemon just doesn't start.
+++ ola-0.10.3.nojsmin/debian/changelog 2018-10-31 17:02:06.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+ola (0.10.3.nojsmin-2+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix typo in /etc/init.d/rdm_test_server; Closes: #876251.
+
+ -- Wouter Verhelst Wed, 31 Oct 2018 17:02:06 +0100
+
ola (0.10.3.nojsmin-2
Control: tags -1 + help
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:41:59PM +0200, Christoph Biedl wrote:
> (At least) AoE devices are handled properly if mounted with the _netdev
> mount option.
... but NBD devices are not. I'm not sure what changed, have been trying
to figure that out for the past week or so.
/changelog
+++ nbd-3.15.2/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+nbd (1:3.15.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * tests/run/certs/client-cert.pem: regenerate with a certificate
+validity of 10 years rather than 1, so that the test suite does not
+fail.
+
+ -- Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org>
Hi Niels,
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:16:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Unblocked, thanks.
Awesome, thanks.
> Btw, I think you may have wanted to run clean before downgrading
> debhelper. :) At least, I doubt you wanted to include the following
> files in the source.
>
>
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: logtool/1.2.8-10
thanks
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:15:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> 1) Please undo the compat bump; it causes actions at a distance that
> hard to reason about from a diff and as such we have it as a defacto
>
n/postinst, debian/preinst: add dpkg-maintscript-helper stuff
+to move conffiles to their new location
+ * debian/logtool.dirs: add new directories
+ * The above 6 items Closes: #858046.
+
+ -- Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> Tue, 28 Mar 2017 17:43:41 +0200
+
logtool (1.2.8-8) unsta
exports, too. Patch by Vagrant as
+well; Closes: #840612.
+ * Fix up Makefile.am so it really works on kFreeBSD, now, and rerun
+autotools.
+ * Change configure.ac to hardcode version number rather than regenerating it
+from git tags (which doesn't work on the Debian branch...)
+
+ -- Wouter
. Closes: #858348.
+
+ -- Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:15:09 +0100
+
pmw (1:4.28-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* debian/rules: reorganize so that dpkg-buildpackage -A works. Closes:
#806094
diff -Nru pmw-4.28/debian/rules pmw-4.28/debian/rules
--- pmw-4.28/debian
-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+ * Fix symlink target to point to a .js file rather than a .sj one (whoops);
+Closes: #857399.
+
+ -- Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> Fri, 17 Mar 2017 17:13:52 +0100
+
ola (0.10.3.nojsmin-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Drop all minified java
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 09:30:17AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> I have aged -1 so that it migrates in the next britney run (in ~1.5h). Please
> wait for it to migrate and then go ahead, and file a new unblock request.
Will do, thanks.
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem
Hi Niels,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:57:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst:
> > Hi,
> >
> > It looks like this bug didn't reach the list, possibly due to the large
> > attachment that came with it.
> >
> > Since ola is due to be removed fr
Hi,
It looks like this bug didn't reach the list, possibly due to the large
attachment that came with it.
Since ola is due to be removed from testing tomorrow, and since I'd like
to avoid that, I'd like to see at least some form of response ;-)
On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:12:05PM +, Debian
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:37:50PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 18:45 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > I'd like to see an update for #787398 in jessie, as a customer of mine has
> > hit this bug, and it's a p
with
+reduced TCP window sizes and resulting loss of data. Closes:
+#787398.
+
+ -- Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> Wed, 21 Dec 2016 18:31:01 +0100
+
evolution-data-server (3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u2) unstable;
urgency=medium
* d/p/05_imapx-Shared-folders-removed-folde
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:06:17AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > There is a forward-co
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 06:00:37PM +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 04:43:46PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > There is a forward-compatibility bug in nbd-client <= 3.9, in that it
> > incorrectly merges two flags fields when sen
(sorry for jumping in late here)
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:51:55AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 01:37 +0300, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
>
> > At the openmainframeproject EU meetup, it was indicated that SUSE
> > joined with indication that Open Build Service might be able to
ng to nbd-server >= 3.9
+does not cause every export to be (incorrectly) marked as read-only.
+
+ -- Wouter Verhelst <wou...@debian.org> Thu, 05 May 2016 16:26:48 +0200
+
nbd (1:3.8-4+deb8u2) jessie; urgency=low
* Cherry-pick two commits from 3.10 to fix authfile parsing.
only in
Hi,
Older versions of nbd-client (up to 3.10) contain a bug wherein they
incorrectly merge two flag fields before passing them to the kernel. The
bug has existed for a long time, but originally nobody cared since the
one flag field had just one flag that happened to merge onto a flag
that's
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 05:46:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +cpnfirmed
On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 09:51 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:29:30PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 14:37:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 04:29:30PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 14:37:57 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:33 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:07:13PM
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 02:59:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2015-07-18 at 15:33 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That's much bigger than I was expecting given your description, and I'm
not sure all of the changes
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 12:07:13PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
That's much bigger than I was expecting given your description, and I'm
not sure all of the changes were intended to be included.
Crap. I fucked up again. Can you reject that, or is it too late?
--
It is easy to love a country
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:21:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 19:07 +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
#785727 describes a regression in the version of nbd-server in jessie
wrt the one in wheezy, related to the allow configuration file. It's
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
#785727 describes a regression in the version of nbd-server in jessie
wrt the one in wheezy, related to the allow configuration file. It's
not a security-related bug (as it
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 09:35:04AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Yeah, I know nbd has to be specifically required/set up for that to be
used at all. I probably should learn how to test that myself,
FYI, it's really not all that hard:
# create a 10G sparse file:
dd if=/dev/zero of=/srv/nbd/file
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:28:29AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Was installation over nbd tested with latest nbd-client-udeb in d-i? I'd
rather avoid chasing a possible regression because I let stuff in that's
really late.
As I said on IRC just now: I did a test earlier today, and it
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 05:28:29AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Wouter,
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org (2015-02-21):
Please unblock package nbd
I had uploaded it way back in october, around the freeze, and had
thought that it had migrated. Yesterday, I noticed (to my surprise
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 02:58:13AM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
Control: tags -1 + d-i - moreinfo
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 09:24:20PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be
wrote:
retitle 778919 unblock: nbd/1:3.8-4
thanks
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote
retitle 778919 unblock: nbd/1:3.8-4
thanks
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 07:02:00PM +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2015 at 08:43:27PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
wrote:
If you prefer, I can do another upload with the junk removed. Either
way works for me
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 07:01:32AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2014-11-17 01:13, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi -release,
Yes, I realize that the freeze is upon us, and that therefore this
request is, technically, too late. However, I would like to request to
be allowed to update ola
Hi -release,
Yes, I realize that the freeze is upon us, and that therefore this
request is, technically, too late. However, I would like to request to
be allowed to update ola in jessie to a more recent upstream version.
The version in testing currently has a few endianness-related bugs which
Hi,
I uploaded nbd-3.5 yesterday to deal with CVE-2013-6410, but forgot to
adjust the urgency to high. Since testing is vulnerable, this really
ought to be done.
Can you please fix?
Thanks,
--
This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space.
If it starts pointing toward
On 27-05-13 19:53, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 26/05/13 16:10, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, a new upload happened and I've just flagged it for
acceptance.
It FTBFS again though on mips/mipsel while running the testsuite - for a
different reason this time:
Hi folks,
So, nbd 1:3.2-4 did not make the cut for wheezy, mainly because it took
some time for it to get ready; and when it finally was and I remembered
to ask about it again, it was too late.
It was hinted in the bugreport there that maybe I could still get it
into r1. I'd like to explore that
Hi all,
On 02-04-13 15:08, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi Steven,
On 02-04-13 14:51, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Wouter,
You had a FTBFS on mips which would need to be fixed in any case.
E: listing not allowed by server.
FAIL: list
That sounds like it might
Hi all,
On 29-03-13 08:24, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hrm.
Some of these are things that I do think should be part of r0.
How about this, then:
- No new upstream release (I knew that was a long shot, but hey, I had
to try)
- I do upload a package with the following patches:
- #685610
Hi Steven,
On 02-04-13 14:51, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Wouter,
You had a FTBFS on mips which would need to be fixed in any case.
E: listing not allowed by server.
FAIL: list
That sounds like it might be related to this change you mentioned? But
seems odd
Hi Julien,
On 12-03-13 10:39, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:55:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 13:58:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
What are my chances of that being allowed in?
For r0 I would say it's too late. It should still be possible
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:55:42PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 13:58:24 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
What are my chances of that being allowed in?
For r0 I would say it's too late. It should still be possible to
include fixes in a subsequent point release.
Hrm
Hi folks,
I'd like to do an upload of a new upstream release of nbd.
I realize that we're pretty deep in the freeze and that now pobably
isn't a very good time to do that anymore. I'd still like that a freeze
exception.
Here's my rationale:
Since the release of NBD 3.2 in July last year, 46
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 10:06:15PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 22:48 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
Please unblock package iceape. It fixes the last Mozilla security
round.
Julien unblocked this a while ago, but it's not migrated due to missing
builds on a few
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 03:47:08PM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them.
[...]
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org
pmw
I had overlooked the fact that serious means release critical
Hi folks,
FOSDEM 2013 is near, and the cross-distro talk room schedule isn't full
yet, so I'm trying to fish for some more talks (oh noes! run for the
hills!)
Since we'll have released by then[1], I thought it might be nice if you
guys were to hold a talk at FOSDEM about the past release process
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:26:06AM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
britney says
partman-nbd/armhf unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb
partman-nbd/s390x unsatisfiable Depends: nbd-client-udeb
but I guess that's always
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 09:37:11PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 22:25 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:34:13AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 06:26:06AM +, Adam Barratt wrote:
partman-nbd/armhf unsatisfiable
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I've uploaded an NMU of openldap to DELAYED/7, targetted at stable, to
deal with #665199 (slapd in unstable can't read the data files from
slapd in stable, because the libdb version
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 02:03:16PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 14:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I've uploaded an NMU of openldap to DELAYED/7, targetted at stable, to
deal with #665199 (slapd in unstable can't read the data files from
slapd in stable, because
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:32:39AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
We are considering removing the following packages from testing as
they have unfixed RC bugs filed against them. The packages can be
found in the attached dd-list. The bugs that put them on this list
can be found in the removals
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:12:14PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/08/12 14:35, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Yes it's possible some people rely on that behaviour, e.g. serving JPEG
data from PHP scripts named like
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:40:54PM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
On Aug 20, Wouter Verhelst w...@uter.be wrote:
But some sites accept file uploads with arbitrary names, perhaps
expected to be a JPEG image, but actually named bar.php.jpeg and
containing malicious server-side PHP which
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:17:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
- In Squeeze, using default configurations, files with .php in their name
such as foo.php.jpeg are executed as PHP scripts by the Apache web
servers
runing PHP scripts through php5-cgi.
Maybe that's because it's expected
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 01:10:57PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 20/08/12 08:02, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:17:26AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
- In Squeeze, using default configurations, files with .php in their
name
such as foo.php.jpeg are executed
On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 05:23:02PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 17:08:16 -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:59:39AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
so I've put it up at http://people.debian.org/~wouter/nbd-3.2.diff
Looks fine to me.
Great
On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 12:59:39AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hello,
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org (02/07/2012):
No, this isn't a request for a freeze exception, yet. I'd just like to
test the waters before I start working on this: […]
I think the [2] pointer in the freeze
Hi,
No, this isn't a request for a freeze exception, yet. I'd just like to
test the waters before I start working on this:
I have a number of crash-fix patches waiting upstream for nbd, which I
had hoped to make a new upstream release for and upload into Debian
before hopping on a plane to
Hi Neil,
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 10:16:07AM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote:
Hi,
We know no-one likes reading long mails on d-d-a, so we'll keep this
short: we'll be stopping automatic migrations of packages from unstable
to testing - aka freezing - on June 30th.
Meaning, anyone who'd planned
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 09:32:15PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/22/2012 05:34 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Step 1: upgrade/dist-upgrade with ia32-libs (wine, ...) held back
Step 2: dpkg --add-architecture i386 apt-get update
Step 3: dist-upgrade (ia32-libs, wine, ... is now
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:40:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org (23/06/2012):
Meaning, anyone who'd planned to use debcamp to do some final polish
on their package which they'd like to see in the release is now
stuffed, and will have to find the time
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:12:32PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-03-18 at 15:54 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
partman-nbd
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 03:42:03PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 15:37, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
wrote:
partman-nbd
Not done. The files client.c, oef and opdr have all disappeared and a
chunk of code has changed in resolv.c, without any mention
Hi,
partman-nbd was originally uploaded with 'Architecture: all', then
received a program written in C and was (first) changed to
'Architecture: any'. Since partman-nbd uses Linux-specific features,
however, that makes no sense, so I changed it to say 'Architecture:
linux-any' instead.
Due to
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 12:38:22PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Aside from that, there *aren't* any partman-nbd/kfreebsd-* packages
in testing:
$ dak ls partman-nbd -s testing
partman-nbd |0.2 | testing | source, all
Yes, sorry; I was confused (it's been a while since I last
Only change: updated vietnamese translation (and if any further
translators now pop up tomorrow as they did for my last two uploads,
I'll get very angry ;-) )
--
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no
Hi,
I just uploaded a new version of NBD. The only change was an updated
Spanish translation.
Please allow it to migrate to testing.
Thanks,
--
The biometric identification system at the gates of the CIA headquarters
works because there's a guard with a large gun making sure no one is
trying
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 03:23:55PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 09/23/2010 03:04 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
I just uploaded a new version of NBD. The only change was an updated
Spanish translation.
The diff shows:
man/Makefile| 521
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 05:01:17PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/24/2010 03:46 PM, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Hi,
I need to do another update for NBD. The main reason is to close
#593783, which is RC; but I would like to include fixes for #592905 and
#594140, too.
Looks fine
Hi,
I need to do another update for NBD. The main reason is to close
#593783, which is RC; but I would like to include fixes for #592905 and
#594140, too.
The changes I intend to make can be reviewed at
http://git.debian.org/?p=users/wouter/nbd.git;a=commitdiff;h=HEAD;hp=2.9.16-3
Would the
Hi,
nbd 2.9.16-3 closes one Severity: important bug (#591275), fixes two
regressions wrt anything = 2.9.15 (including the version currently in
lenny), and adds translation updates. Please allow it to migrate after
its 10-day delay has passed.
I have a translation deadline later this week, but
So, with the freeze now a fact, I'm a bit in dubio about what to do with
beid.
The version currently in testing, 3.5.2, works on the architectures
where it isn't fundamentally buggy (i.e., all non-64bit architectures).
But it doesn't work properly on others. There're also a few build issues
on
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 06:31:25AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
What I personally would like is that packages are generally uploaded
within 24 hours after the buildd log is sent, and also they are
generally uploaded within 3 days after the source package is uploaded
/ binNMU is requested (the
Hi,
This morning, when I signed the mails from voltaire and malo, I received
one response from voltaire that said that it didn't have OpenOffice.org
taken for building, but that instead it was marked as Dep-Wait.
Investigating turned up that this was manually modified by a person from
the
Hi,
The NBD packages are currently blocked because the package produces a
udeb. Since the version in testing has a bug that prevents the
initscript from working with the module-init-tools that are also in
testing, it would be nice if you could allow NBD to migrate.
This will have zero impact on
Hi,
The main reason why I did the NBD upload was to fix #507875: a minor
documentation fix that I'm sure you guys would have approved without
thinking over the matter.
However there are a few other changes, some of which introduce minor
code changes, so let me walk you over them. From the
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:24:50PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hey there, just wondering if folks have requested to debian-release
that newer nbd should be allowed into testing ?
Not me, yet.
seems like it's sat in unstable for 20+ days, and the only thing holding
it up is the .udeb ?
On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 12:57:53PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
-release: please push nbd into testing (unless someone on -boot objects).
There's a .udeb which (for now) is stale; my plans are to (eventually)
write a partman-nbd to support installing to an NBD device. It's not
ready yet
On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:41:58AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Can we have a enable IPV6 yes/no question in the installer? That fixes all
problems in one go. Then tweak the system's defaults for the answer.
Sure. While we're at it, can we also have a question enable UTF-8? Oh,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 07:52:47PM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote:
Hallo Release Team,
I've read in the release goals:
RELEASE GOALS
=
* full IPv6 support
Advocate: Martin Zobel-Helas
and wrote to Martin Zobel-Helas who redirected me here.
My experience with IPv6 in Debian
Hi,
I know this is going to be kinda controversial, but I'd really like to
make a case to either upload mono 1.2.3.1 to unstable (and eventually
have it migrate to etch), or to at least backport the fix for #403495 to
the version in unstable.
Justification: I filed #403495 at the severity
Hi,
Obviously, a few days after my previous upload-with-freeze-exception got
through to experimental, someone asked me to update the french
translation, since there were some fuzzies.
logtool 1.2.8-6 defuzzies these three strings in french, and also
contains updates for other languages. Could
Hi,
Subject says it all. Changes are limited to nbd-server's postinst, and
are needed to fix #406963, which is RC.
Thanks,
--
Fun will now commence
-- Seven Of Nine, Ashes to Ashes, stardate 53679.4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 06:00:38PM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Translation changes only.
Both unblocked.
Thanks.
However, the excuse for nbd currently says Unblock request by he
ignored due to version mismatch: 2.8.7-3. Could you have
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 03:03:00PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
Translation changes only.
Eh, make that logtool 1.2.8-5. Forgot a changelog entry :)
--
Lo-lan-do Home is where you have to wash the dishes.
-- #debian-devel, Freenode, 2004-09-22
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi,
As above. Changes are limited to:
* adding debian/README.Debian, explaining a few bits about how to use
the package;
* editing debian/control for documentation (really, add two packages
to Recommends:, as explained in README.Debian, and add a few lines to
a Description: to point the
On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 01:46:24PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
Wouter? Michael?
Sorry. Ack, on all this. It sounds like the best thing to do.
Now all I need is to make some time to figure out how all this is
supposed to work, and I can jump in.
--
Lo-lan-do Home is where you have to wash the
On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 03:06:54AM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
I've seen no reports for the following architectures, which is
disappointing:
alpha, arm, m68k, mips, mipsel
m68k will not make etch; we're now working on getting something for our
current users so that they can, at least, continue
a release of our own
design (maybe leaving out some tough stuff; at the very least something
you can install and then work from).
On Sun, Oct 22, 2006 at 02:37:04AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
(c) not bother with an etch-equivalent release for m68k
I'm with Stephen on this one
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 05:55:13PM +0200, Michael Schmitz wrote:
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Anthony Towns wrote:
Isn't it going to be so that we'd be able to do our own
arch-specific NMUs in both cases? Or is it in both cases going to be a
matter of deciding which package will be part of the
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 03:43:03AM +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
The point is that m68k gets kicked out _before_ any alternative has been
implemented.
Well, yeah, but it's not because we weren't given a fair chance. I'm not
happy about this any more than you are, but this doesn't help. Sorry.
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 07:00:21PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 09:49:50AM +0200, Ingo Juergensmann wrote:
Oh well...
It doesn't meet the release criteria because of the toolchain problems, that
have now been solved.
No, it hasn't. You need to be reliably abouve
Hi,
This version of belpic is waiting on SPARC to build before it can go to
testing. However, the build there failed due to issues with java (it
needs it to build a small jini library).
I don't know much about SPARC, but I'd sure as hell not like to miss the
release again with belpic. Would it
1 - 100 of 165 matches
Mail list logo
