Eric Valette wrote:
The only release-relevant thing I can see here is that it's not a
release-critical bug. Thank you for bringing it to my attention so that
I could downgrade it. :-)
(The grave severity implies the package is unusable, which libc6-dev
isn't; it doesn't seem to fit any of the
The only release-relevant thing I can see here is that it's not a
release-critical bug. Thank you for bringing it to my attention so that
I could downgrade it. :-)
(The grave severity implies the package is unusable, which libc6-dev
isn't; it doesn't seem to fit any of the criteria for serious
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 12:22:17AM +0100, Eric Valette wrote:
While I do understand that debian 3.1 is the most important things most
of you are working on, I would like to bring your attention to the
actual status of libc6-dev and specifically on the incoherences that
exists between the
3 matches
Mail list logo
