Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston, libtabe; db4.5

2007-10-22 Thread Florian Weimer
* Steve Langasek: If you can tell me how to do this without downloading dozens of MB of data, I'll do it. Well, it would've been easier if the addition of db4.5 symbol versions had been accompanied by a shlibs bump, Yeah, but this was a bug I tried to fix. 8-/ but something like this

Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston, libtabe; db4.5

2007-10-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 01:08:52AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Bastian Blank: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Would you please schedule bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston and libtabe on all architectures? (There might be more packages affected on other

Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston, libtabe; db4.5

2007-10-17 Thread Adeodato Simó
* Florian Weimer [Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:08:52 +0200]: * Bastian Blank: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: In a related issue, testing migration for db4.5 is prevented by the removal of Java packages on hppa in 4.5.20-8. This probably needs some kind of manual

Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston, libtabe; db4.5

2007-10-17 Thread Clint Adams
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 10:35:01PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: Yes, you have to file a bug against ftp.debian.org mentioning the binaries, architectures, and reason. Ported asked us to do so should suffice, if that's it. In this particular round of Java package removals, no one asked us to do

Re: [Pkg-db-devel] Bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston, libtabe; db4.5

2007-10-15 Thread Florian Weimer
* Bastian Blank: On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:11:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Would you please schedule bin-NMUs for radiusd-livingston and libtabe on all architectures? (There might be more packages affected on other architectures, but I can't easily search for them.) You should