Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled

On Thu, 4 May 2000, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > > Yust to remember there's bug #57301 that the quake2* packages have to be > > removed from slink (in 2.1r6). > > This has been done already (maybe your mirror is out of sync?). Bug should be > closed. >... It wasn't a mirror out of sync but my personal

Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled

On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 08:40:26AM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote: > considered RC. (i.e. we're not going to delay a release because of problems in > a package that isn't even going to be officially released.) No, we should just pull them. They can't be critical. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMA

Re: [SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled

On Wed, 3 May 2000, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Yust to remember there's bug #57301 that the quake2* packages have to be > removed from slink (in 2.1r6). This has been done already (maybe your mirror is out of sync?). Bug should be closed. As a side note, non-free is not officially a part of Debian, s

[SLINK] Quake2* needs to be pulled

Yust to remember there's bug #57301 that the quake2* packages have to be removed from slink (in 2.1r6). cu, Adrian -- A "No" uttered from deepest conviction is better and greater than a "Yes" merely uttered to please, or what is worse, to avoid trouble. -- Mahatma Ghandi