[SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13

2011-02-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, please consider approving xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13 for squeeze. For the record, I pushed 2:1.7.7-12 to unstable during the end of the freeze to get it a bit more exposure, it had the following changes: | xorg-server (2:1.7.7-12) unstable; urgency=low | | * Cherry-pick this to fix crashes

Re: [SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13

2011-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:32 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: | xorg-server (2:1.7.7-13) stable; urgency=low | | * bug script: Report KMS configuration files and their contents. | * bug script: Keep only one lspci call (with proper filtering), which | makes PCI IDs come back. | *

Re: [SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13

2011-02-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (18/02/2011): What are the potential side-effects of removing the check; i.e. what issue was it introduced to guard against in the first place? Initial commit was: | commit 6a6d907e7057cadbd80572119c09732385cd | Author: Tiago Vignatti

Re: [SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13

2011-02-18 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 21:08 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (18/02/2011): What are the potential side-effects of removing the check; i.e. what issue was it introduced to guard against in the first place? [...] I'd call it “just a sanity check”. Okay;

Re: [SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13

2011-02-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 19:50:52 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:32 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: | xorg-server (2:1.7.7-13) stable; urgency=low | | * bug script: Report KMS configuration files and their contents. | * bug script: Keep only one lspci call (with

Re: [SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13

2011-02-18 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi again, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (18/02/2011): Okay; thanks. Please go ahead. thanks. I'm sorry, I totally forgot to mention it has an udeb. I'm Cc-ing -boot@ accordingly. That shouldn't affect g-i in any way, though. Otavio/-boot@: the thread started here:

Re: [SRM] Approval for xorg-server/2:1.7.7-13

2011-02-18 Thread Otavio Salvador
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 20:30, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: ... Otavio/-boot@: the thread started here:  http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/02/msg00286.html ... It is OK for us. -- Otavio Salvador                             O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br