Hi Adam,
After further discussion, and looking at the security issues which
upstream acknowledge being fixed in 5.3.3, please go ahead with the
upload to unstable. I'm undecided yet whether to age the upload (and if
so by how much) but an earlier upload has more chance of being unblocked
Hi Adam.
so I had problems with orig tarball, so my upload was rejected. Hence
the 5.3.3-2 release contains all changes. So please unblock 5.3.3-2
after a reasonable period of time.
Thanks you,
Ondrej
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 16:59, Ondřej Surý ond...@debian.org wrote:
Hi Adam,
After further
On 10/20/2010 02:30 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
After further discussion, and looking at the security issues which
upstream acknowledge being fixed in 5.3.3, please go ahead with the
upload to unstable.
Since Raphael said he wouldn't have time to work on PHP after after
October starts, I was
I'll take care of it, I have already spoken with Raphael.
Ondrej Sury
On 20.10.2010, at 18:00, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
On 10/20/2010 02:30 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
After further discussion, and looking at the security issues which
upstream acknowledge being fixed in 5.3.3,
- Original message -
# Added fifth parameter to openssl_encrypt()/openssl_decrypt() (string
$iv) to use non-NULL IV. Made implicit use of NULL IV a warning. (Sara)
By looking at http://php.net/openssl_encrypt:
this function is currently not documented
but anyway, this must be a non
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 20:56 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
sapi/fpm: new SAPI
That's a rather quick dismissal of what appears to be completely new
functionality comprising 10,000 lines of code (+ patches and packaging
files), imho. Given that the package description even says that most
sapi/fpm: new SAPI
That's a rather quick dismissal of what appears to be completely new
functionality comprising 10,000 lines of code (+ patches and packaging
files), imho. Given that the package description even says that most
people shouldn't install it, how much of an issue would not
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 22:37, Raphael Geissert geiss...@debian.org wrote:
If you want ditch the work that has been done by upstream, my fellow
maintainers, and other contributors, go ahead. Just beware that the current
version in testing isn't ready.
I would add that we know that it took us
On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 15:37 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Pure debdiff is misleading:
debdiff -w *dsc | filterdiff -x '*/tests/*' -x '*win32*' -x '*debian/*' -x
'*TSRM/*' -x '*configure*' -x '*README*' -x '*NEWS*' -x '*pcrelib*' -x
'*mysqlnd*' -x '*/build/*' -x '*oci8/*' -x '*libsqlite*' -x
On Saturday 02 October 2010 06:47:49 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 23:52:48 -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
I would like to ask for a freeze exception to upload 5.3.3 to unstable
and be the version shipped in Squeeze.
959 files changed, 78731 insertions(+), 47717
10 matches
Mail list logo
