Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2023-03-02 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, Sorry for the delayed answer, also to Sam's original question. On 25-02-2023 17:52, Guillem Jover wrote: On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 09:47:59 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: Ah, was wondering the same few days before the toolchain freeze, as I was unsure whether to update some of the packages I

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2023-02-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 09:47:59 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Ah, was wondering the same few days before the toolchain freeze, as I > was unsure whether to update some of the packages I maintain (in > particular libmd, for which I was thinking of doing a new upstream > release), and was also

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2023-01-25 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Guillem" == Guillem Jover writes: Guillem> …but hmm, is this perhaps not taking into account Guillem> Pre-Depends? Something seems to be wrong. It was very convenient that pam is not in the essential set--I got to update it. And yet login , which sure appears to be essential

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2023-01-25 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Sat, 2022-12-17 at 08:42:18 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > On 16-12-2022 02:40, Sam Hartman wrote: > > I was looking at > > https://release.debian.org/testing/essential-and-build-essential.txt > > > > trying to figure out which packages I'm involved in are covered by the > > toolchain

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2022-12-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Paul, On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 04:42:43PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > Well, the key package set is something else than the set we consider for the > first freeze. doh (obviously), sorry for the noise. > The key package set is a set based on source, so indeed it > doesn't differ per suite.

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2022-12-17 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Holger, On 17-12-2022 12:50, Holger Levsen wrote: On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 08:42:18AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: I just refreshed the list, it's still there. I used a script on udd, essentially this: [...] query = "SELECT DISTINCT package FROM packages WHERE release = 'bookworm' and

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2022-12-17 Thread Holger Levsen
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 08:42:18AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote: > I just refreshed the list, it's still there. I used a script on udd, > essentially this: [...] > query = "SELECT DISTINCT package FROM packages WHERE release = 'bookworm' > and essential = 'yes'" [...] this made me check what we're

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2022-12-16 Thread Paul Gevers
Dear Sam, On 16-12-2022 02:40, Sam Hartman wrote: I was looking at https://release.debian.org/testing/essential-and-build-essential.txt trying to figure out which packages I'm involved in are covered by the toolchain freeze. I am wondering what's still pulling libgssapi-krb5-2 and friends

Bug#1026199: release.debian.org: Is the toolchain list updated for bookworm

2022-12-15 Thread Sam Hartman
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal I was looking at https://release.debian.org/testing/essential-and-build-essential.txt trying to figure out which packages I'm involved in are covered by the toolchain freeze. I am wondering what's still pulling libgssapi-krb5-2 and friends into