On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 02:03:40AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Why don't you avoid all the possible problems for security support in
testing by handling build dependencies as dependencies?
This has been discussed over the past couple of days; it may be best to
turn on build-dep checking in
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Security support can turn out to be a nightmare if build dependencies
aren't fulfilled.
As security bloke I can only agree to this.
Regards,
Joey
--
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:50:36PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Adrian Bunk ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050329 19:35]:
If testing should make any sense, handling build dependencies as
dependencies in the testing scripts was required.
We all know that your opinion about the usefulness of testing
3 matches
Mail list logo
