On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 11:55:17PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
I uploaded an NMU of your package.
Please see this as help to get the package into a releaseable condition again.
No, argh, no!
gdome2-xslt was involved in the OCaml 3.10.1 transition which is
currently involving 99 source packages
Hi,
* Stefano Zacchiroli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080317 09:31]:
But you can't upload like that, at least use a delayed queue by 1 or 2
days.
I'll make sure it resets it only by 1 or 2 days, thanks for the notice.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
[ the problem is already solved, as aba kindly offered to take care of
the needed urgency bumps, replying just to make it clearer my position ]
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:26:22AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Stefano Zacchiroli]
But you can't upload like that, at least use a delayed queue
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:54:43AM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote:
* Stefano Zacchiroli ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080317 09:31]:
But you can't upload like that, at least use a delayed queue by 1 or 2
days.
I'll make sure it resets it only by 1 or 2 days, thanks for the notice.
Thanks a lot.
--
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
If you do not want an NMU to solve a release goal bug, I believe you
need to reply to BTS with a statement explaining why. We can use
0-day NMUs to solve release goals, and I believe this is a good thing,
to have any hope of completing the
[Stefano Zacchiroli]
But you can't upload like that, at least use a delayed queue by 1 or
2 days.
Sure he can. It is stated policy for release goals.
If you do not want an NMU to solve a release goal bug, I believe you
need to reply to BTS with a statement explaining why. We can use
0-day
6 matches
Mail list logo
