also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.02.11.0858 +0100]:
Should the RT be happy to accept it, I've attached a diff that adds
those two distributions to the list. (On a side note, --bpo will still
create an etch-backports upload, but I haven't changed that in order to
keep
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:27:16AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:08 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.02.11.0800
+0100]:
Please do. Having a devscripts
Philipp Kern wrote, Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:50 AM
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 09:27:16AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Please upload.
Apart from the fact that devscripts might be something for volatile,
I don't think we have time to include this arch-specific upload. It can
surely
martin f krafft wrote, Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:21 AM
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.02.11.0858
+0100]:
Should the RT be happy to accept it, I've attached a diff that adds
those two distributions to the list. (On a side note, --bpo will still
create an
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 10:08 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
martin f krafft wrote, Wednesday, February 11, 2009 9:21 AM
I suggest to also include the fix to --bpo. I'll gladly review the diff.
I've already uploaded the version that Marc approved. I can prepare a
further update if desired;
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 07:35 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
dch warning: Recognised distributions are: unstable, testing, stable,
oldstable, experimental, UNRELEASED, {sarge,etch}-{volatile,backports},
{oldstable-,testing-,}proposed-updates and
{testing,stable,oldstable}-security.
If this
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 08:08 +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk [2009.02.11.0800
+0100]:
If this also applies to the lenny version, this bug should be
made RC!
It does (I'm assuming there'll also be a lenny-volatile in the not
too
7 matches
Mail list logo
