tag 641155 + pending
thanks
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 17:45 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 18.01.2012 17:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[]
So I think it is ready to be uploaded to pu. Should I do so or
should I post another debdiff for review?
If the only change since the previous debdiff
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 641155 + pending
Bug #641155 [release.debian.org] pu: package mdadm/3.1.4-1+8efb9d1+squeeze1
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
641155:
On 14.01.2012 20:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[]
+ * Schedule start/stop of mdadm-raid before/after filesystems are
+checkedmounted/unmounted; thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
+(closes: #611632).
[...]
+ * Make mdadm-raid init script depend on hostname; thanks to Mario
+
On 18.01.2012 12:55, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 14.01.2012 20:40, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[]
+ * Schedule start/stop of mdadm-raid before/after filesystems
are
+checkedmounted/unmounted; thanks to Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe
+(closes: #611632).
[...]
+ * Make mdadm-raid init script depend
On 18.01.2012 17:34, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[]
So I think it is ready to be uploaded to pu. Should I do so or
should I post another debdiff for review?
If the only change since the previous debdiff is the removal of the duplicate
changelog entry, please go ahead. If there's anything else,
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:33 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
So, after quite some time, I'm attempting another upload of mdadm to
stable-pu. All the changes were sitting in testing for half a year,
and were backported into stable/squeeze version.
As before, the proposed changes are only in
On 14.01.2012 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 12:33 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
So, after quite some time, I'm attempting another upload of mdadm to
stable-pu. All the changes were sitting in testing for half a year,
and were backported into stable/squeeze version.
As
On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 20:23 +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 14.01.2012 19:50, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
+ * Fix checkarray script so that it does not die after scheduling the
first
+device when there is no scheduling class specified; thanks to Mario
+'BitKoenig' Holbe (closes:
In a previous life, on 11.09.2011 02:09, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:09:35AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
but some of the bugs are very annoying and
On 11.09.2011 02:09, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:09:35AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
but some of the bugs are very annoying and already made quite
also sprach Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru [2011.09.11.0846 +0200]:
So I have to upload this squeeze1 version to unstable,
No, we prepare 3.2.2-1 for unstable, which contains all the fixes we
propose for squeeze1. Once 3.2.2-1 moves to testing, we cherry-pick
the fixes into a new squeeze1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Severity: normal
Hello.
We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
but some of
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 01:09:35AM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
We'd like to upload a bugfix release of mdadm package for the
next squeeze point release. There are mostly cosmetic changes,
but some of the bugs are very annoying and already made quite
some users unhappy - like the famous
13 matches
Mail list logo
