On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 21:08 -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam Even accounting for the patch overhead, the diff is still somewhat
Adam larger than most we'd usually handle via proposed-updates. That's not
Adam necessarily a
On Mon, 2012-04-30 at 20:46 -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
OK. The handling of auto* tools in the coolkey 1.1.0-6 package in stable
means that the clean target in debian/rules doesn't restore the files
to pre-built state. So there was too much autotools cruft in the
previous
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam Even accounting for the patch overhead, the diff is still somewhat
Adam larger than most we'd usually handle via proposed-updates. That's not
Adam necessarily a blocker in and of itself, but we are rapidly approaching
Adam the cut-off
Adam == Adam D Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Adam Please don't close release.debian.org bugs in your changelog;
OK. I uploaded a revision to the debdiff coolkeyspu2.debdiff
which also includes upstream patch descriptions in debian/changelog.
Adam are all of the above patches strictly
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 18:08 -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
+coolkey (1.1.0-6+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * updated to follow the new Card Compatibility Container (CCC)
specification
+to support recently issued smartcards in Debian stable. (Closes: #670367)
Please don't close
Proposed debdiff for coolkey 1.1.0-6+squeeze1 is attached.
Patches are the same from coolkey 1.1.0-12 in testing, but
added to debian/patches using dpatch since 1.1.0-6 used dpatch.
Same source tarball coolkey_1.1.0.orig.tar.gz in testing and stable.
- -Maitland
[ATTACHMENT ~/coolkeyspu.debdiff,
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 17:16 -0400, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
Proposed debdiff for coolkey 1.1.0-6+squeeze1 is attached.
I think something may not have gone according to plan there. What was
actually attached was just:
plain text document attachment (coolkeyspu.debdiff.asc)
-BEGIN PGP
On 2012-04-25 01:10, A. Maitland Bottoms wrote:
I have good results with my own squeeze backport - but since I am new
to the
stable proposed updates process I would like advice from the release
team on what
version number I should use to upload to stable. I'll post the
package diff
to this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Severity: normal
Coolkey 1.1.0-6 in Debian stable lacks support for new Gemalto TOPDLGX4 144K
CAC cards.
People who have been using coolkey in Debian are likely
9 matches
Mail list logo
