On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 19:07:38 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
What is clear is that the atlas binaries built on the amd64 buildds
should not have the problem that is affecting the current amd64 binary
(for example I tested the binary for 3.8.4-3 which was built on buildds
and it is sane).
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 19:07:38 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
What is clear is that the atlas binaries built on the amd64 buildds
should not have the problem that is affecting the current amd64 binary
(for example I tested the binary for 3.8.4-3
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
The package for amd64 has apparently been built with a too recent and specific
CPU architecture, leading to Illegal instructions on many recent Intel Core
CPUs. A rebuild fixes the problem.
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 02:34:56PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
The package for amd64 has apparently been built with a too recent and specific
CPU architecture, leading to Illegal instructions on many recent Intel Core
CPUs. A rebuild fixes the problem.
How? By assuming that the buildd
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 02:34:56PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
The package for amd64 has apparently been built with a too recent and
specific
CPU architecture, leading to Illegal instructions on many recent Intel Core
CPUs. A rebuild fixes the
5 matches
Mail list logo