Bug#676906: nmu: atlas_3.8.4-6

2012-06-11 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 19:07:38 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: What is clear is that the atlas binaries built on the amd64 buildds should not have the problem that is affecting the current amd64 binary (for example I tested the binary for 3.8.4-3 which was built on buildds and it is sane).

Bug#676906: nmu: atlas_3.8.4-6

2012-06-11 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 19:07:38 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: What is clear is that the atlas binaries built on the amd64 buildds should not have the problem that is affecting the current amd64 binary (for example I tested the binary for 3.8.4-3

Bug#676906: nmu: atlas_3.8.4-6

2012-06-10 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu The package for amd64 has apparently been built with a too recent and specific CPU architecture, leading to Illegal instructions on many recent Intel Core CPUs. A rebuild fixes the problem.

Bug#676906: nmu: atlas_3.8.4-6

2012-06-10 Thread Philipp Kern
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 02:34:56PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: The package for amd64 has apparently been built with a too recent and specific CPU architecture, leading to Illegal instructions on many recent Intel Core CPUs. A rebuild fixes the problem. How? By assuming that the buildd

Bug#676906: nmu: atlas_3.8.4-6

2012-06-10 Thread Sébastien Villemot
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes: On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 02:34:56PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: The package for amd64 has apparently been built with a too recent and specific CPU architecture, leading to Illegal instructions on many recent Intel Core CPUs. A rebuild fixes the