Re: Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-12-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Sat, 2012-12-08 at 22:12 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote: Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org writes: Dear release team: I want to upload a new version of libanyevent-i3-perl to testing-proposed-updates which is the same version as currently in testing

Processed: Re: Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-12-15 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 + confirmed Bug #682247 [release.debian.org] unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 682247: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=682247 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To

Re: Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-12-08 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi, Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org writes: Dear release team: I want to upload a new version of libanyevent-i3-perl to testing-proposed-updates which is the same version as currently in testing + commits

Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-11-27 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi, intrigeri intrig...@debian.org writes: I'm not speaking for the release team, but I believe this unblock request would get more attention and have more chances to be processed if the proposed changes were limited to fixing the bugs that need to be fixed. I think so, too. Dear release

Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-11-25 Thread intrigeri
Hi Michael, Michael Stapelberg wrote (05 Oct 2012 15:18:46 GMT) : If you insist on the source format being a big change, I could revert that. Do you want me to do that? I'm not speaking for the release team, but I believe this unblock request would get more attention and have more chances to

Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-10-05 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Cyril, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org writes: Rule #1 on http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html I understand that, but at the same time there is rule #6 and I’d definitely say that it applies :-). In any case, the decision is up to the release team. I can only say that I think

Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-07-20 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libanyevent-i3-perl libanyevent-i3-perl provides an API to communicate with the i3 window manager (popcon of i3-wm is ~400 installations). It will typically be used

Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-07-20 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 19:35:05 +0200, Michael Stapelberg wrote: The changes to the packaging itself are minimal and mostly cosmetic: [...] + * set debian/source/format to 3.0 (quilt) That's anything bug minimal. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-07-20 Thread Michael Stapelberg
Hi Julien, Quoting Julien Cristau (2012-07-20 20:23:08) + * set debian/source/format to 3.0 (quilt) That's anything bug minimal. Why is it not minimal? The package itself does not contain any patches, so I consider this a formality. Could you elaborate please? Best regards, Michael -- To

Bug#682247: unblock: libanyevent-i3-perl/0.12-1

2012-07-20 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Michael Stapelberg stapelb...@debian.org (21/07/2012): Why is it not minimal? The package itself does not contain any patches, so I consider this a formality. Could you elaborate please? Rule #1 on http://release.debian.org/wheezy/freeze_policy.html Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: