On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 21:05 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 08:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > It's not really worth it just to fix that; if the package is in a VCS it
> > would be worth adding there so it's included in any future uploads
> > though.
>
> Ok, so version 93
On 01/08/2013 08:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
It's not really worth it just to fix that; if the package is in a VCS it
would be worth adding there so it's included in any future uploads
though.
Ok, so version 93u+-1.2 is unblocked for migration from t-p-u to testing
now?
Cheers,
Adrian
--
On Tue, 2013-01-08 at 20:14 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 01/08/2013 08:13 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Approved, thanks. fwiw, the description appears to be missing some words
> >
> > +Description: fix-cd-builtin
> > + This patch integrates the changes from the upstream commit
> >
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 687779 unblock: ksh/93u+-1.2
Bug #687779 [release.debian.org] unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ksh/93u+-1.2' from 'unblock: ksh/93u+20120628-1'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need ass
retitle 687779 unblock: ksh/93u+-1.2
thanks
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:24:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >So, what do you suggest? New upstream version or patching the current
> >version in unstable?
>
> Either would work for me. otoh, maybe I'm being too fussy - it just
> feels a little wr
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:24:29PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 07.01.2013 13:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:11:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> >>I wasn't suggesting getting a new upstream version in to testing.
> >>The fact that the fix for testing is
On 07.01.2013 13:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:11:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
I wasn't suggesting getting a new upstream version in to testing.
The fact that the fix for testing is going via tpu doesn't change
the wish to have it fixed in unstable first.
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 01:11:01PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I wasn't suggesting getting a new upstream version in to testing.
> The fact that the fix for testing is going via tpu doesn't change
> the wish to have it fixed in unstable first.
So, what do you suggest? New upstream version or p
On 07.01.2013 13:03, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:07:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks for the confirmation. In general, we prefer that the fixes
are
applied and verified in unstable first, as it's generally easier to
fix
up in the event of any issues. (I
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:07:51PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 22:18 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:05:37PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > The version information for #679966 looks like it might have got broken
> > > at some poi
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 22:18 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:05:37PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > The version information for #679966 looks like it might have got broken
> > at some point; is the bug still present in the unstable package?
>
> Yes, the bug i
Hi Adam!
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 09:05:37PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> For future reference, it's preferred if you post the debdiff and then
> wait for an ack before uploading to tpu; I realise that dev-ref isn't
> entirely helpful here (it's on the to-do list somewhere).
Ok, I didn't know t
On Wed, 2013-01-02 at 21:28 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I just created an updated ksh package for testing and uploaded
> it as an NMU to t-p-u. I have verified my fix to work and the
> built-in cd works now properly as it is using all upstream changes
> addressing the problem while ig
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #687779
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I just created an updated ksh package for testing and uploaded
it as an NMU to t-p-u. I have verified my fix to work and the
built-in cd works now properly as it is using all u
14 matches
Mail list logo
