Bug#688791: unblock: elfutils/0.153-2

2012-11-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:52:20PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:15:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 20:08 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > So Neil told me on IRC to just fix #684825 via t-p-u using the patch > > > that's in that bug report. > > >

Bug#688791: unblock: elfutils/0.153-2

2012-11-12 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:15:48PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 20:08 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > So Neil told me on IRC to just fix #684825 via t-p-u using the patch > > that's in that bug report. > > > > I looked in to that and found that to due multi-arch changes in >

Bug#688791: unblock: elfutils/0.153-2

2012-11-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2012-10-27 at 20:08 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > So Neil told me on IRC to just fix #684825 via t-p-u using the patch > that's in that bug report. > > I looked in to that and found that to due multi-arch changes in > glibc I now run into #691612. > > So if I want to fix it via t-p-u I woul

Bug#688791: unblock: elfutils/0.153-2

2012-10-27 Thread Kurt Roeckx
So Neil told me on IRC to just fix #684825 via t-p-u using the patch that's in that bug report. I looked in to that and found that to due multi-arch changes in glibc I now run into #691612. So if I want to fix it via t-p-u I would also need to backport the multi-arch changes. The original patch

Bug#688791: unblock: elfutils/0.153-2

2012-10-10 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Oct 06, 2012 at 05:40:17PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > I would really like to know how to proceed with this. Can someone please comment on this? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lis

Bug#688791: unblock: elfutils/0.153-2

2012-09-25 Thread Kurt Roeckx
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, I would like to move the elfutils version 0.153-2 to testing. Note that the version 0.152-1 is currently in testing, so this is a new upstream version. The version in testing has an RC