Hi!
AFAICT midgard2-core is the only package of the two having an open RC
bug affecting testing (namely, #677795). So keeping it while removing
php5-midgard2 from testing would not help us (from a release PoV).
Note that php5-midgard2 is only being removed because it
(Build-)Depnds on
On 2013-04-10 10:16, Piotr Pokora wrote:
Hi!
for the record, the discussion on #677795 lead to a release team
member write As it is, I am inclined to agree with OdyX's
observations, so I am tagging the bug as will-remove for now.
I don't feel I have the right hat to close these two unblock
Hi,
for the record, the discussion on #677795 lead to a release team
member write As it is, I am inclined to agree with OdyX's
observations, so I am tagging the bug as will-remove for now.
I don't feel I have the right hat to close these two unblock requests
(#688966 and #692358) accordingly,
Hi!
for the record, the discussion on #677795 lead to a release team
member write As it is, I am inclined to agree with OdyX's
observations, so I am tagging the bug as will-remove for now.
I don't feel I have the right hat to close these two unblock requests
(#688966 and #692358)
On 10.04.2013 09:16, Piotr Pokora wrote:
OK, so can we keep midgard2-core 10.05.7.1-1?
It migrated to testing 300 days ago, while package which depends on
it
- php5-midgard2 - which also has been uploaded 300 days ago didn't
migrate?
After 300 days the easiest solution seems to be will-remove
Hi!
After 300 days the easiest solution seems to be will-remove for now
but there hasn't been any single explanation why one package migrated
while the other not?
It didn't migrate because of #678531 still being considered as open by
the BTS until Niels fixed the bug state up in November
On 10.04.2013 11:10, Piotr Pokora wrote:
After 300 days the easiest solution seems to be will-remove for
now
but there hasn't been any single explanation why one package
migrated
while the other not?
It didn't migrate because of #678531 still being considered as open
by
the BTS until Niels
Only (and only) if midgard2-core[0] and php5-midgard2[1] are
distributed together.
Why?
Because php5-midgard2 provides language bindings to midgard2 content repository.
Unfortunately there's no php-gir bindings. Testing distribution has
midgard2-core 10.05.7 and php5-midgard2 10.05.6. Both
Hi!
So, php5-midgard2 would need just a rebuild to pick up the new library
name, together with uploading of midgard2-core. The mentors link of
php5-midgard2 has expired, but if I recall correctly Piotr had only
indeed put it there with a changelog entry like rebuild, so there are
no actual
Hi Timo and Piotr,
Timo Jyrinki wrote (04 Mar 2013 07:41:40 GMT) :
So, php5-midgard2 would need just a rebuild to pick up the new
library name, together with uploading of midgard2-core.
Thank you for the prompt clarification!
Just to clarify even further, would a binNMU be enough? (The
intrigeri wrote (04 Mar 2013 10:16:35 GMT) :
In any case, it looks now clear that this needs to be unblocked else
php5-midgard2 will be broken by midgard2-core is no valid reason, in
itself, to grant the unblock requested by #688966. Hopefully this will
help the release team make a decision :)
Hi again,
and sorry for the flood..
Piotr Pokora wrote (04 Mar 2013 09:15:53 GMT) :
Exactly. There are no changes made to php5-midgard2 package, so it
only requires rebuild against fixed[0] midgard2-core package.
OK, this confirms #692358 and #688966 are totally unrelated, then.
Thank you.
Exactly. There are no changes made to php5-midgard2 package, so it
only requires rebuild against fixed[0] midgard2-core package.
OK, this confirms #692358 and #688966 are totally unrelated, then.
Only (and only) if midgard2-core[0] and php5-midgard2[1] are
distributed together.
In any other
Piotr Pokora wrote (04 Mar 2013 15:15:23 GMT) :
Exactly. There are no changes made to php5-midgard2 package, so it
only requires rebuild against fixed[0] midgard2-core package.
OK, this confirms #692358 and #688966 are totally unrelated, then.
Only (and only) if midgard2-core[0] and
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Piotr Pokora wrote (03 Oct 2012 11:02:22 GMT) :
Attached.
Thank you, and sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=692358#17
you wrote:
I am not sure due to #688966.
If midgard2-core is accepted to
Processing control commands:
tag -1 + moreinfo
Bug #688966 [release.debian.org] unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
688966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
04.03.2013 00:54, intrigeri kirjoitti:
I am not sure due to #688966.
If midgard2-core is accepted to stable, then php5-midgard2
might break.
If midgard2-core might break another package that's currently in
testing, then IMHO this should be expressed in terms of binary package
Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
Hi,
Piotr Pokora wrote (03 Oct 2012 11:02:22 GMT) :
We do not have access to NEW. Hence you'd need to provide us with
a debdiff for us to voice our opinion about it.
Attached.
The patch was too big, so it did not make it to the list, but it is
attached to the bug
Processing control commands:
tags -1 - moreinfo
Bug #688966 [release.debian.org] unblock: midgard2-core/10.05.7.1-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
688966: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688966
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 04:44:52PM +0200, Piotr Pokora wrote:
Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze.
Package contains only one RC bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795
New source package which fixes the bug (with renamed packages) is
waiting in queue
Hi!
Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze.
I'm assuming you mean wheezy?
Of course wheezy :)
Package contains only one RC bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795
and hopefully fixes one RC bug :-)
It's worth mentioning that lintian (-i -I -E
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze.
Package contains only one RC bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795
New source package which fixes the bug (with renamed packages)
On 27.09.2012 15:44, Piotr Pokora wrote:
Please review midgard2-core for inclusion in squeeze.
I'm assuming you mean wheezy?
Package contains only one RC bug:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677795
and hopefully fixes one RC bug :-)
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
23 matches
Mail list logo
