On 2012-12-27 22:17, intrigeri wrote:
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) :
intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
current testing's gpa?
It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e00549 [1].
I'm
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (25 Nov 2012 08:39:49 GMT) :
intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
current testing's gpa?
It seems that this is part of upstream Git commit 61e00549 [1].
I'm not fluent at C, but the relevant part of
Hi,
intrigeri wrote (10 Nov 2012 15:27:12 GMT) :
How hard would it be to backport the --disable-x509 option into
current testing's gpa?
Ping?
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @
tags 689706 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Daniel Leidert wrote (05 Oct 2012 10:50:17 GMT) :
So what is your opinion? Can we agree on uploading gpa 0.9.3 to
unstable and unblocking this version or do you reject this request?
If you agree, I would upload and then downgrade severity of #634930.
How
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 689706 + moreinfo
Bug #689706 [release.debian.org] unblock: gpa/0.9.3-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
689706: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=689706
5 matches
Mail list logo