On 29/12/12 17:55, Julien Cristau wrote:
- if possible, get a list of packages in squeeze that expose an
affected struct (gstreamer, glibmm, others?)
Ping. We need to make some progress here...
I'm still trying to construct this list. It's going to take a while.
On the positive side, it
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 13:51:26 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:
Before rebuilding the world, I'd like to avoid breaking partial
upgrades. Which, as far as I can tell, means:
- if possible, get a list of packages in squeeze that expose an affected
struct (gstreamer, glibmm, others?)
- once
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:05:49 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
The upgrade from GLib 2.30 to 2.32 breaks ABI on most non-x86 32-bit
architectures (#674156). Specifically, the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
The upgrade from GLib 2.30 to 2.32 breaks ABI on most non-x86 32-bit
architectures (#674156). Specifically, the deprecated struct GStaticMutex,
and the deprecated structs GStaticRecMutex and
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:05:49 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
The upgrade from GLib 2.30 to 2.32 breaks ABI on most non-x86 32-bit
architectures (#674156). Specifically, the
Simon McVittie s...@debian.org (27/11/2012):
Here is a lengthy list of binNMUs. I would like these to be done on
all architectures: our slower architectures are the ones that really
need the rebuild anyway, and if we also rebuild on the fast
architectures, then those packages from this list
On 27/11/12 09:28, Julien Cristau wrote:
*sigh*
Yeah, I know. I don't think there is a good solution to this, and
mass-binNMUing seems like the least awful.
Here is a lengthy list of binNMUs. I would like these to be done on all
architectures [...] those
packages from this list that are
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 09:36:56 +, Simon McVittie wrote:
I'd hoped that binNMUing for all architectures with the same commit
message avoided that, but I suppose the timestamp in debian/changelog
is what causes the problem?
Timestamp, name/address, and Binary-only non-maintainer upload
8 matches
Mail list logo
