Oops, I somehow missed the previous mail.
I just uploaded a fixed revision to t-p-u with wrapper functions
marked as static and symbols file change reverted.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 17:46:40 -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
2013/1/7 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
So yes I think I'd prefer an upload reverting the .symbols change.
Unfortunately, simply reverting the
2013/1/7 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
So yes I think I'd prefer an upload reverting the .symbols change.
Unfortunately, simply reverting the .symbols change is not enough, as
dpkg-gensymbols is passed -c4 option which makes freerdp FTBFS due to
newly added symbols.
What do you suggest?
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Luca Falavigna dktrkr...@debian.org wrote:
2013/1/7 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
So yes I think I'd prefer an upload reverting the .symbols change.
Unfortunately, simply reverting the .symbols change is not enough, as
dpkg-gensymbols is passed -c4 option
2013/1/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
If the symbols are added in this 1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1 version, why did you
make the symbols file claim they're in 1.0.1?
I blindly picked those suggested by dh_makeshlibs.
Should I prepare a new upload fixing this?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 20:22:16 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
2013/1/6 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
If the symbols are added in this 1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1 version, why did you
make the symbols file claim they're in 1.0.1?
I blindly picked those suggested by dh_makeshlibs.
Should I
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 18:05:00 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
I hadn't realized the patch added new symbols (altough they're quite
harmless), and I had to refresh debian/libfreerdp1.symbols
accordingly. Full debdiff of the changes is attached.
Otavio, as freerdp is listed as LowNMU, I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I'd like to see if it's feasible to upload a targeted fix to testing-proposed-
updates to address #662854.
This bug has been fixed in unstable already, also introducing changes [0] which
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #697101 [release.debian.org] tpu: freerdp/1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1 (pre-approval)
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
697101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=697101
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Tue, 2013-01-01 at 14:54 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
I'd like to see if it's feasible to upload a targeted fix to testing-proposed-
updates to address #662854.
This bug has been fixed in unstable already, also introducing changes [0]
which
should not fit
I hadn't realized the patch added new symbols (altough they're quite
harmless), and I had to refresh debian/libfreerdp1.symbols
accordingly. Full debdiff of the changes is attached.
Otavio, as freerdp is listed as LowNMU, I uploaded it to DELAYED/5.
1.0.1-1.1+deb7u1.debdiff
Description: Binary
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 14:54:32 +0100, Luca Falavigna wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I'd like to see if it's feasible to upload a targeted fix to testing-proposed-
updates to address #662854.
This bug
12 matches
Mail list logo
