Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #706828
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
please update Ben file for tracking libgd2 transition after the
package name change as agreed on #debian-release.
New Ben file:
is_affected = .build-depends ~
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:57:38 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
is_good = .depends ~ /libgd2-3/;
Why is the package name not libgd3, if the SONAME is libgd.so.3?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:35 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:57:38 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
is_good = .depends ~ /libgd2-3/;
Why is the package name not libgd3, if the SONAME is libgd.so.3?
Upstream policy is to keep API stable for major (=2)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I took over maintainership of libgd2 and also sort of become part of
the upstream. We are preparing libgd 2.1.0 release (mainly merged
parts of embedded libgd library in PHP) and
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:00:23 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Ben file:
title = libgd2;
is_affected = .depends ~ /libgd2-(noxpm|xpm)$/ | .depends ~
/libgd2-(noxpm|xpm)-dev/ | .depends ~ /libgd2-3/ | .depends ~ /libgd2-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libgd2-3/ | .depends ~ /libgd2-dev/;
is_bad =
Should I fill separate bug report or is bundling this into this
bugreport is ok? I will send it separate since Gmail has a bad habit
of wrapping the lines...
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 2:24 PM, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:00:23 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Followup-For: Bug #706828
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
And those two Ben files here:
Ben file:
title = libgd2;
is_affected = .depends ~ /libgd2-(noxpm|xpm)/ | .depends ~ /libgd2-3/;
is_good = .depends ~ /libgd2-3/;
is_bad =
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:57:11 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Should I fill separate bug report or is bundling this into this
bugreport is ok? I will send it separate since Gmail has a bad habit
of wrapping the lines...
I don't think the -dev part is something -release needs to be involved
in,
Ok, thanks, the transitional packages are there, so just drop that part and
I'll fill individual bugs for the -dev part for affected packages when the time
comes.
Ondřej Surý
On 5. 5. 2013, at 17:42, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 14:57:11 +0200, Ondřej
9 matches
Mail list logo
