Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2013-09-23 at 21:08 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2013-09-20 at 08:45 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
Julien Cristau, 2013-09-19 23:48+0200:
The debdiff should be in this bug, please.
Sorry, I thought I did it. Here it is.
Thanks. In general
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #723798 [release.debian.org] pu: package gajim/0.15.1-4
Added tag(s) pending.
--
723798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723798
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
package gajim
fixed 693282 0.15.4-1
thanks
Adam D. Barratt, 2013-09-19 23:08+0100:
If http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693282#50 is correct
and the bug is already fixed in unstable, please also add an appropriate
fixed version.
Indeed. I have just checked, the changes that fix
Cyril Brulebois, 2013-09-23 05:14+0200:
Also, one can wonder why urgency is high for an upload prepared in
april, and not going through security channels.
I was not maintaining this package at that time, and I just took the
proposed NMU, thinking that urgency was relevant. If it is not, I can
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #723798 [release.debian.org] pu: package gajim/0.15.1-4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
723798: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=723798
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2013-09-19):
If http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=693282#50 is correct
and the bug is already fixed in unstable, please also add an appropriate
fixed version.
Ping?
Also, one can wonder why urgency is high for an upload prepared in
Julien Cristau, 2013-09-19 23:48+0200:
The debdiff should be in this bug, please.
Sorry, I thought I did it. Here it is.
--
,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu
| `-'Debian Developer irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy
\_
diff -u gajim-0.15.1/debian/changelog
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello,
The version of gajim currently in stable, 0.15.1-4, has a security bug,
CVE-2012-5524 / Debian #693282. corsac has prepared an NMU for
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 23:32:03 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hello,
The version of gajim currently in stable, 0.15.1-4, has a security bug,
CVE-2012-5524 / Debian #693282. corsac has
On Thu, 2013-09-19 at 23:48 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 23:32:03 +0200, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
The version of gajim currently in stable, 0.15.1-4, has a security bug,
CVE-2012-5524 / Debian #693282. corsac has prepared an NMU for that, and I
was
suggested to upload
10 matches
Mail list logo