Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #725304 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
Added tag(s) pending.
--
725304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:12 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Adam D. Barratt:
Please feel free to upload; the package will then be
processed after the point release.
Fine. Thank you!
Flagged for acceptance; thanks.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Adam D. Barratt:
There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since
23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671]
In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5
via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #725304 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
725304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 20:58 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Adam D. Barratt:
There is a 9.0-10+deb70.4 upload in Secre^WSecurity Team's queue since
23 days ago but I've no idea the status if this. [rt.debian.org #4671]
In that case, the status of that package
Adam D. Barratt:
In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5
via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work.
.4 just went into proposed-updates.
No. It's in wheezy-security, but it's _not_ in proposed-updates because
it reached pu-NEW
On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:12 +, Robert Millan wrote:
Adam D. Barratt:
In that case, the status of that package needs clarifying. Releasing .5
via p-u if .4 is then going to appear via security doesn't really work.
.4 just went into proposed-updates.
No. It's in wheezy-security,
On Thu, 2013-10-03 at 23:06 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 03/10/13 22:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Does this affect unstable? If so, please update the BTS accordingy, get
the fix there, and revisit the pu bug afterwards.
The change (dropping 101_nullfs_vsock.diff) was already made back
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Please, consider giving your pre-approval to this update, the purpose
of which is to fix a grave kernel page fault condition (see #71 for
details).
Thanks!
Index: debian/changelog
Control: tag -1 moreinfo wheezy
Robert Millan r...@debian.org (2013-10-03):
Please, consider giving your pre-approval to this update, the purpose
of which is to fix a grave kernel page fault condition (see #71 for
details).
Does this affect unstable? If so, please update the BTS
Processing control commands:
tag -1 moreinfo wheezy
Bug #725304 [release.debian.org] pu: package kfreebsd-9/9.0-10+deb70.5
Added tag(s) wheezy and moreinfo.
--
725304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On 03/10/13 22:17, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Does this affect unstable? If so, please update the BTS accordingy, get
the fix there, and revisit the pu bug afterwards.
The change (dropping 101_nullfs_vsock.diff) was already made back in
9.1-1, and so I've updated the BTS accordingly. I agree that
12 matches
Mail list logo
