On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:59 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Everything's good except for transmission, which failed on kfreebsd. Probably
a
miniupnpc call only compiled on that architecture. Once that's fixed, things
should be ready to transition.
Can somebody please look into
On 26/08/14 22:34, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:59 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Everything's good except for transmission, which failed on kfreebsd.
Probably a
miniupnpc call only compiled on that architecture. Once that's fixed, things
should be ready to
On 13/07/14 22:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 13/07/14 17:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
A binNMU needs to happen for the following source packages (I have
re-checked again this list using apt-rdepends -r, and it's still correct):
- 0ad
- bitcoin
- eiskaltdcpp
- litecoin
- megaglest
-
On 07/05/2014 11:59 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 05/07/14 17:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, is the next course of action to upload miniupnpc to Sid now, then
raise the severity of #751225 and #751229 to RC, then upload fixes to
DELAYED/2?
Yes please.
Bugs #751225 and #751229 where
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 749560 pending
Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
749560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749560
On 07/13/2014 11:02 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 07/05/2014 11:59 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 05/07/14 17:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
So, is the next course of action to upload miniupnpc to Sid now, then
raise the severity of #751225 and #751229 to RC, then upload fixes to
DELAYED/2?
On 13/07/14 17:12, Thomas Goirand wrote:
A binNMU needs to happen for the following source packages (I have
re-checked again this list using apt-rdepends -r, and it's still correct):
- 0ad
- bitcoin
- eiskaltdcpp
- litecoin
- megaglest
- sushi
- transmission
- warzone2100
Scheduled.
On 06/11/2014 11:37 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Bugs open with patches (with help from upstream of MiniUPnPc):
0ad: #751224
megaglest: #751225
warzone2100: #751229
I have checked the build with newer MiniUPnP client, and no issues as
far as I can tell.
Great!
0ad has been
Processing control commands:
tags -1 confirmed
Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc
Added tag(s) confirmed.
notforwarded -1
Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc
Unset Bug forwarded-to-address
--
749560:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: notforwarded -1
(let's use the auto tracker)
On 05/07/14 17:45, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 06/11/2014 11:37 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Bugs open with patches (with help from upstream of MiniUPnPc):
0ad: #751224
megaglest: #751225
warzone2100: #751229
On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until that
migrates.
Yes, I uploaded a patched version
Hi,
On 09/06/14 15:20, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until that
Hi Thomas,
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:40:35 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913.
Can't that fix be applied independently?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing control commands:
forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libminiupnpc10.html
Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libminiupnpc10.html'.
--
749560:
Hi,
Thanks both of you for your quick reply.
On 05/28/2014 02:03 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:40:35 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of
#748913.
Can't that fix be applied independently?
As the patch was
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
I wish to upload miniupnpc version 1.9.20140401, which bumped the SONAME
to 10. Affected packages (as per apt-rdepends):
Reverse Depends: 0ad (= 0.0.16-2+b1)
Reverse Depends:
16 matches
Mail list logo