Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-08-26 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:59 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Everything's good except for transmission, which failed on kfreebsd. Probably a miniupnpc call only compiled on that architecture. Once that's fixed, things should be ready to transition. Can somebody please look into

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-08-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 26/08/14 22:34, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:13:59 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Everything's good except for transmission, which failed on kfreebsd. Probably a miniupnpc call only compiled on that architecture. Once that's fixed, things should be ready to

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-14 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 13/07/14 22:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 13/07/14 17:12, Thomas Goirand wrote: A binNMU needs to happen for the following source packages (I have re-checked again this list using apt-rdepends -r, and it's still correct): - 0ad - bitcoin - eiskaltdcpp - litecoin - megaglest -

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 07/05/2014 11:59 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 05/07/14 17:45, Thomas Goirand wrote: So, is the next course of action to upload miniupnpc to Sid now, then raise the severity of #751225 and #751229 to RC, then upload fixes to DELAYED/2? Yes please. Bugs #751225 and #751229 where

Processed: Re: Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 749560 pending Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 749560: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749560

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-13 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 07/13/2014 11:02 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 07/05/2014 11:59 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 05/07/14 17:45, Thomas Goirand wrote: So, is the next course of action to upload miniupnpc to Sid now, then raise the severity of #751225 and #751229 to RC, then upload fixes to DELAYED/2?

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 13/07/14 17:12, Thomas Goirand wrote: A binNMU needs to happen for the following source packages (I have re-checked again this list using apt-rdepends -r, and it's still correct): - 0ad - bitcoin - eiskaltdcpp - litecoin - megaglest - sushi - transmission - warzone2100 Scheduled.

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-05 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/11/2014 11:37 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Bugs open with patches (with help from upstream of MiniUPnPc): 0ad: #751224 megaglest: #751225 warzone2100: #751229 I have checked the build with newer MiniUPnP client, and no issues as far as I can tell. Great! 0ad has been

Processed: Re: Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-05 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 confirmed Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc Added tag(s) confirmed. notforwarded -1 Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc Unset Bug forwarded-to-address -- 749560:

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-07-05 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: notforwarded -1 (let's use the auto tracker) On 05/07/14 17:45, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 06/11/2014 11:37 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Bugs open with patches (with help from upstream of MiniUPnPc): 0ad: #751224 megaglest: #751225 warzone2100: #751229

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-06-09 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote: Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913. That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until that migrates. Yes, I uploaded a patched version

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-06-09 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, On 09/06/14 15:20, Thomas Goirand wrote: On 05/28/2014 02:55 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 28/05/14 06:40, Thomas Goirand wrote: Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913. That seems fixed in 1.6-4 now, so should be fine? We can wait until that

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-05-28 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Thomas, On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:40:35 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913. Can't that fix be applied independently? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-05-28 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libminiupnpc10.html Bug #749560 [release.debian.org] transition: miniupnpc Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libminiupnpc10.html'. -- 749560:

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-05-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Thanks both of you for your quick reply. On 05/28/2014 02:03 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:40:35 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Note that I would like this transition to happen ASAP, because of #748913. Can't that fix be applied independently? As the patch was

Bug#749560: transition: miniupnpc

2014-05-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, I wish to upload miniupnpc version 1.9.20140401, which bumped the SONAME to 10. Affected packages (as per apt-rdepends): Reverse Depends: 0ad (= 0.0.16-2+b1) Reverse Depends: