On 2014-09-27 18:49, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
be
Robert Edmonds wrote:
OK, protobuf 2.6.0-4 with the atomics fix is now in the archive and
built on all architectures. Please give back shogun on mips.
Oh, nevermind, I see shogun was rebuilt on mips against protobuf 2.6.0-4
a few minutes ago.
--
Robert Edmonds
edmo...@debian.org
--
To
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 14/09/14 00:26, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I see a build failure on mips in the 'shogun' package:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=shogunarch=mipsver=3.2.0-7.2%2Bb1stamp=1410641206
This is actually an architecture+compiler specific
Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
be binNMU'd.
It turns out
On 20/09/14 21:40, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG exited with status
code 512)
Can you
On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2014-09-20 20:02, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
while loading changes: No
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 15:02:58 -0400, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
while loading changes: No
On 14/09/14 15:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 13/09/14 20:46, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
The delay ended but the signature seems invalid:
20140919160333|process-upload|dak|mapnik-vector-tile_0.5.1+dfsg-1.1_multi.changes|Error
while loading changes: No valid signature found. (GPG exited with status code
512)
Can you re-upload with a good
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 14/09/14 00:26, Robert Edmonds wrote:
I see a build failure on mips in the 'shogun' package:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=shogunarch=mipsver=3.2.0-7.2%2Bb1stamp=1410641206
This is actually an architecture+compiler specific build
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + pending
Bug #760343 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 2.6.0
Added tag(s) pending.
--
760343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On 13/09/14 20:46, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before node-mapnik can
be binNMU'd.
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
node-mapnik
---
This package Build-Depends against mapnik-vector-tile, which ships a
.pb.h file in /usr/include (a bad upstream practice).
mapnik-vector-tile needs to be binNMU'd first before
I see a build failure on mips in the 'shogun' package:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=shogunarch=mipsver=3.2.0-7.2%2Bb1stamp=1410641206
This is actually an architecture+compiler specific build failure.
(Funnily enough, shogun uses clang++ on some architectures but c++
on
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
I guess we could do those, better safe than sorry. However since they don't
have
any dependencies on libproto*, they will probably migrate instantly. I'm not
sure that is the intended behaviour either.
I have scheduled the first round of binNMUs (all but
On 10/09/14 23:09, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
My only concern here is that we hit problems like on the previous
transitions,
this close to the freeze. But ia64 and sparc are no longer release
architectures
and you tested both on amd64 and s390x, and the last time
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 03/09/14 05:27, Robert Edmonds wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Sorry for submitting this bug so shortly before the upcoming cutoff on
new transitions, but I'd like to
Processing control commands:
tags -1 confirmed
Bug #760343 [release.debian.org] transition: protobuf 2.6.0
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
760343: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
My only concern here is that we hit problems like on the previous transitions,
this close to the freeze. But ia64 and sparc are no longer release
architectures
and you tested both on amd64 and s390x, and the last time you did a good job
in
fixing the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
Sorry for submitting this bug so shortly before the upcoming cutoff on
new transitions, but I'd like to update protobuf to 2.6.0 for jessie,
which was just released last week. This
24 matches
Mail list logo
