Your message dated Tue, 16 Dec 2014 21:20:40 +0000 with message-id <20141216212040.gl11...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#769784: unblock: carmetal/3.5.2+dfsg-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #769784, regarding unblock: carmetal/3.5.2+dfsg-1.1 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 769784: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=769784 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package carmetal The RC bugs targetting this package have been fixed -------source debdiff----8<----------------------- diff -Nru carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog --- carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2011-03-10 15:09:26.000000000 +0100 +++ carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/changelog 2014-11-10 18:38:08.000000000 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,17 @@ +carmetal (3.5.2+dfsg-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * upgraded Standards-Version to 3.9.6 + * removed the --with quilt clauses from debian/rules + * removed --with clauses after commands like dh_auto_clean which ignore + this switch; added jh_* scripts in place. + * removed 'jh_depends --jvm="open sun6"' from debian/rules. + Closes: #753787 + * checked that the package can be built and is working inside debian/sid. + Closes: #552990; Closes: #577119 + + -- Georges Khaznadar <georg...@debian.org> Mon, 10 Nov 2014 17:58:38 +0100 + carmetal (3.5.2+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control --- carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control 2011-03-10 15:36:28.000000000 +0100 +++ carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/control 2014-11-10 17:58:16.000000000 +0100 @@ -2,9 +2,10 @@ Section: math Priority: extra Maintainer: Yves Combe <y...@ycombe.net> -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), javahelper (>= 0.32), quilt (>= 0.46-7~), ant, ant-optional, docbook-to-man, rhino +Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), javahelper (>= 0.32), + quilt (>= 0.46-7~), ant, ant-optional, docbook-to-man, rhino Build-Depends-Indep: default-jdk -Standards-Version: 3.9.1 +Standards-Version: 3.9.6 Package: carmetal Architecture: all diff -Nru carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules --- carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules 2011-03-10 15:06:53.000000000 +0100 +++ carmetal-3.5.2+dfsg/debian/rules 2014-11-10 18:07:09.000000000 +0100 @@ -6,17 +6,19 @@ export CLASSPATH=js.jar %: - dh --with javahelper,quilt $@ + dh --with javahelper $@ override_dh_auto_build: - dh_auto_build --with javahelper,quilt + dh_auto_build + jh_clean docbook-to-man debian/carmetal.sgml > debian/carmetal.1 override_dh_auto_clean: - dh_auto_clean --with javahelper,quilt + dh_auto_clean + jh_clean rm -f debian/carmetal.1 override_jh_manifest: -override_jh_depends: - jh_depends --jvm="open sun6" +#override_jh_depends: +# jh_depends --jvm="open sun6" -----------------------8<----------------------- Please, unblock carmetal/3.5.2+dfsg-1.1 -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (650, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 04:21:41PM +0100, Georges Khaznadar wrote: > Dear Adam, > > I already replied this e-mail the 16th November, however I replied only > to Jonathan Wiltshire <j...@debian.org>, not adding > 769...@bugs.debian.org to the recipient list. Ah, that's fallen through the floorboards then. Sorry I didn't spot it. > Please find attached the previous e-mail. > > I repeat here my argument: > I am using carmetal in my high school, like some of my colleagues too. > > As Yves Combe did not reply, how can I take politely the reponsibility > of that package? If you're prepared to take responsibility for it in Jessie, I'll unblock it (doing so now). The polite way to take over the package in general is to do useful work through NMUs, and at some point add yourself to Uploaders. The current maintainer may become more responsive in future, he could just be having a busy time. -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---