Your message dated Thu, 25 Jun 2015 11:45:31 +0200
with message-id <558bcdbb.9050...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#789869: nmu: spark_2012.0.deb-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #789869,
regarding nmu: spark_2012.0.deb-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
789869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789869
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu spark_2012.0.deb-9 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against swi-prolog 7.2.0"
looks like swi-prolog started a small transition, the virtual package
swi-prolog-vm-2 was bumped to swi-prolog-vm-3. The autotracker does not
seem to catch such changes ...
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 25/06/15 02:12, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu spark_2012.0.deb-9 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against swi-prolog 7.2.0"
>
> looks like swi-prolog started a small transition, the virtual package
> swi-prolog-vm-2 was bumped to swi-prolog-vm-3. The autotracker does not
> seem to catch such changes ...
swi-prolog had failed on mipsel. Gave it back and it built fine. spark binNMUed,
thanks for noticing.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
