Your message dated Fri, 30 Oct 2015 11:23:47 +0100
with message-id <56334533.70...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#802222: transition: gdal
has caused the Debian Bug report #802222,
regarding transition: gdal
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
802222: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802222
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
For the Debian GIS team I'd like to transition to the recently released
GDAL 1.11.3 as soon as possible.
GDAL 2.0.1 was released along with 1.11.3 but several reverse dependencies
still need patches to support GDAL 2.0, as recently discussed on the
debian-gis list: https://lists.debian.org/debian-gis/2015/10/msg00022.html
gdal (1.11.3+dfsg-1~exp1) is ready in experimental for about a month
now.
Because of the problematic mix of C & C++ symbols provided by libgdal,
as discussed in the previous transition (#756867), the virtual ABI package
provided by libgdal1i has changed to libgdal.so.1-1.11.3.
The ben file used to prepare this transition is attached.
Despite only marking the packages relying on C++ symbols as bad, I think
all affected reverse dependencies should be binNMUed as part of this
transition.
All reverse dependencies build successfully with gdal (1.11.3+dfsg-1~exp1)
from experimental, except gazebo (5.0.1+dfsg-2.1) and
mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-1) which FTBFS for unrelated reasons. They
both fail to build with plain unstable too.
libgdal-grass (1.11.2-1) doesn't need a binNMU, libgdal-grass (1.11.3-1)
will be uploaded to unstable instead (after liblas & grass have been
rebuilt).
Transition: gdal
libgdal1i (1.11.2+dfsg-3) -> libgdal1i (1.11.3+dfsg-1)
libgdal.so.1-1.11.2 -> libgdal.so.1-1.11.3
The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.
dans-gdal-scripts (0.23-4) OK
fiona (1.6.2-1) OK
gazebo (5.0.1+dfsg-2.1) FTBFS
gmt (5.1.2+dfsg1-2) OK
imposm (2.6.0+ds-2) OK
libcitygml (2.0-1) OK
liblas (1.8.0-5) OK
libosmium (2.4.1-3) OK
mapcache (1.4.0-4) OK
mapnik (3.0.7+ds-4) OK
mapserver (7.0.0-5) OK
merkaartor (0.18.2-1) OK
mysql-workbench (6.3.4+dfsg-1) FTBFS
ncl (6.3.0-4~exp2) OK
node-srs (0.4.8+dfsg-2) OK
openscenegraph (3.2.1-7) OK
osmium (0.0~20150428-7f23002-2) OK
osrm (4.7.1-2) OK
postgis (2.1.8+dfsg-4 / 2.2.0+dfsg-1~exp1) OK / OK
pprepair (0.0~20150323-6284890-2) OK
prepair (0.7-3) OK
qlandkartegt (1.8.1+ds-2) OK
qmapshack (1.3.1-1) OK
rasterio (0.28.0-1) OK
saga (2.2.1+dfsg-1) OK
sumo (0.23.0+dfsg1-2) OK
thuban (1.2.2-8) OK
vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1-4) OK
xastir (2.0.6-4) OK
grass (7.0.1-2) OK
osgearth (2.5.0+dfsg-7 / 2.7.0+dfsg-1~exp4) OK / OK
osmcoastline (2.1.1-1) OK
pktools (2.6.4-3) OK
pyosmium (2.4.1-2) OK
libgdal-grass (1.11.2-1 / 1.11.3-1) FTBFS / OK
qgis (2.8.3+dfsg-3) OK
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 22/10/15 23:39, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 22/10/15 01:48, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 22-10-15 00:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 21/10/15 21:30, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>>>> On 21-10-15 21:19, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>>> On 18/10/15 16:38, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
>>>>>> Despite only marking the packages relying on C++ symbols as bad, I think
>>>>>> all affected reverse dependencies should be binNMUed as part of this
>>>>>> transition.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is that?
>>>>
>>>> Mostly to be better safe than sorry.
>>>>
>>>>> If the C ABI is stable, then there's no need to binNMU the
>>>>> rdeps. If it isn't, then you should change the package name.
>>>>>
>>>>> If we binNMU them now, the binNMUs will migrate to testing before the new
>>>>> gdal, which wouldn't be good if there were ABI changes...
>>>>
>>>> That's a good point.
>>>
>>> Yeah, so let's not do that. Hopefully you've tested the new gdal with some C
>>> apps that didn't break, that'd be good enough. If something turns out to
>>> break
>>> in the end, then you'll have to rename the package... but let's hope that's
>>> not
>>> necessary.
>>
>> Let's hope that indeed.
>>
>>> You can start this.
>>
>> Thanks. I've just uploaded gdal (1.11.3+dfsg-1) to unstable.
>
> binNMUs scheduled.
This got blocked on the qtbase transition as some packages gained dependencies
on qtbase stuff (>= 5.5), but both transitions just went in.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
