Processed: Re: Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-02-10 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 810568 + pending Bug #810568 [release.debian.org] transition: openexr Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 810568: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=810568

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-28 Thread Daniel Stender
libvigraimpex has been updated an don't FTBFS anymore (on most archs so far). BTW there is a test failure on test/impex which puts out some EXR related error [1] (I've set this test to be failsafe). It would be interesting if this maybe vanishes with the more recent openEXR ... DS [1]

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-27 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi Emilio! On 2016-01-27 at 11:25 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries? Now I can say "Yes, they do" ;-) The only missing piece is aqsis, which can be NMUed easily if its maintainer doesn't reply to our request for an updated

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-25 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:37 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On 2016-01-21 at 09:56 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-25 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:37 PM Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > On 2016-01-21 at 09:56 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >> Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-24 Thread Daniel Stender
On 24.01.2016 17:36, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > >> * libvigraimpex_1.10.0+dfsg-11 => FTBFS > > Well this is an issue within the python test: > > AttributeError: 'numpy.ndarray' object has no attribute 'axistags' > >

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-24 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi wrote: > Hi! > > On 2016-01-21 at 09:56 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries? > > FTR, better this time (based on rebuilds made last night): > > * aqsis_1.8.2-2 =>

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-21 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On 2016-01-21 at 09:56 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries? FTR, better this time (based on rebuilds made last night): * aqsis_1.8.2-2 => FTBFS * blender_2.74+dfsg0-5 => FTBFS * darktable_2.0.0-1 => OK * exactimage_0.9.1-10 =>

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-12 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2016-01-11 "Matteo F. Vescovi" wrote: > On 2016-01-11 at 20:50 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries? > Well, not so fine :-/ > Following, you'll find the r-deps for OpenEXR (and IlmBase as direct > b-dep) and

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-11 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! On 2016-01-11 at 20:50 (CET), Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries? Well, not so fine :-/ Following, you'll find the r-deps for OpenEXR (and IlmBase as direct b-dep) and IlmBase (without OpenEXR interference). ### OpenEXR

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-10 Thread Matteo F. Vescovi
Hi! Il giorno dom 10 gen 2016 15:45 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha scritto: > Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the libraries? Well, I did some tests on ilmbase r-deps a couple of months ago, just as a preview of what was supposed to happen soon. But probably those

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-10 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 09/01/16 22:59, Mathieu Malaterre wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi > > I'd like to request a transition for openexr (and ilmbase). Do rdeps build fine against the new versions of the

Bug#810568: transition: openexr

2016-01-09 Thread Mathieu Malaterre
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi I'd like to request a transition for openexr (and ilmbase). Ben file: title = "openexr"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libopenexr6v5" | .depends ~ "libopenexr6"; is_good = .depends ~