Control: tag -1 pending
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 13:31:59 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
> Control: tag -1 + confirmed
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 16:49:02 +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
>
> > Hi !
> >
> > Here is the debdiff!
> >
> > diff -u
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 pending
Bug #825534 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package backuppc/3.3.0-2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
825534: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825534
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
Control: tag -1 + confirmed
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 16:49:02 +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> Hi !
>
> Here is the debdiff!
>
> diff -u backuppc-3.3.0/debian/changelog backuppc-3.3.0/debian/changelog
> --- backuppc-3.3.0/debian/changelog
> +++
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #825534 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package backuppc/3.3.0-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> tag -1 + confirmed
Bug #825534 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package backuppc/3.3.0-2
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
825534:
Hi !
Here is the debdiff!
Cheers,
Ludovic
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 10:12:43AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:17:22 +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm ready to upload a new package without the patch below.
> >
> I'm kind of lost here, please re-send
On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 10:17:22 +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm ready to upload a new package without the patch below.
>
I'm kind of lost here, please re-send a full debdiff for the proposed
upload.
Cheers,
Julien
On Thu, 09 Jun 2016, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm ready to upload a new package without the patch below.
Note that defined(@array) is failing with Perl in stretch... that might be
why the patch got added in the packaging.
(But in any case the test is useless with "@Backups > 0" being
Hi!
I'm ready to upload a new package without the patch below.
Best regards,
Ludovic
> > +++ backuppc-3.3.0/lib/BackupPC/CGI/Browse.pm
> > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
> > #
> > # default to the newest backup
> > #
> > -if ( !defined($In{num}) && defined(@Backups) && @Backups > 0 )
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 04:35:26PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> How do any of these changes relate to the samba update?
>
> > +-$Conf{BackupZeroFilesIsFatal} = 1;
> > ++$Conf{BackupZeroFilesIsFatal} = 0;
Hi!
Yes this first one is necessary because with the new smbclient,
backuppc cannot
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #825534 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package backuppc/3.3.0-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
825534: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=825534
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Fri, 2016-05-27 at 16:47 +0200, Ludovic Drolez wrote:
> Backuppc is a backup service that can be used to backup SMB shares with
> the help of smbclient.
>
> Unfortunately, a security update of Samba, from 2:4.1.17+dfsg-2+deb8u2
> to 2:4.2.10+dfsg-0+deb8u2, broke
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi!
Backuppc is a backup service that can be used to backup SMB shares with
the help of smbclient.
Unfortunately, a security update of Samba, from 2:4.1.17+dfsg-2+deb8u2
to
12 matches
Mail list logo
