Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 14:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Raphael Hertzog (2017-10-04): > > Thanks, uploaded (as a source-only upload, I hope it's fine with > > spu > > too). > > AFAICT jessie doesn't support source-only, anything newer does. > That's correct. stretch is

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Control: tags -1 + pending On Wed, 2017-10-04 at 10:21 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > We already missed the first point release and the change has now > > > been > > > in unstable for a long time already. > > > > Mostly on the basis

Processed: Re: Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #864297 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: schroot/1.6.10-3+deb9u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 864297: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Raphael Hertzog (2017-10-04): > Thanks, uploaded (as a source-only upload, I hope it's fine with spu > too). AFAICT jessie doesn't support source-only, anything newer does. KiBi. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Hi, On Fri, 29 Sep 2017, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > We already missed the first point release and the change has now been > > in unstable for a long time already. > > Mostly on the basis that the changes have persisted "as is" in > unstable, I guess doing so is probably better than nothing.

Processed: Re: Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #864297 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: schroot/1.6.10-3+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 864297: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864297 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2017-09-14 at 11:53 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > > So let me know what I should upload: > > > - only the bash-completion fix > > > - or the whole update that I wanted to push > > > > Michael, any

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Hello, On Fri, 30 Jun 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > So let me know what I should upload: > > - only the bash-completion fix > > - or the whole update that I wanted to push > > Michael, any comments on the proposed systemd change for jessie, please? Michael said that he had nothing to add.

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Hi, Raphael Hertzog (2017-06-29): > On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > Personally, I find the systemd part a bit touchy, but I'm happy to ACK > > the bash-completion fix on its own. Maybe we could handle this in two > > steps, until the systemd unit situation

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Hi, On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Personally, I find the systemd part a bit touchy, but I'm happy to ACK > the bash-completion fix on its own. Maybe we could handle this in two > steps, until the systemd unit situation settles (#865110)? I consider #865110 to be a minor cleanup

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Raphael Hertzog (2017-06-19): > On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > > Given that, I wonder if a stable upload is actually still needed. > > The stable upload also fixes the bash completion file and fixes the > dependencies of the service file to not depend on the

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

On Mon, 19 Jun 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > Given that, I wonder if a stable upload is actually still needed. The stable upload also fixes the bash completion file and fixes the dependencies of the service file to not depend on the systemd version of $network in the LSB dependencies. Cheers, --

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Am 19.06.2017 um 14:11 schrieb Raphael Hertzog: > Hello Michael, > > On Sat, 17 Jun 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: >> I would suggest to simply ship a drop-in snippet for schroot, which sets >> the Type and Timeout. > > Thanks for the suggestion but I'll skip it. This is what I would have > expected

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Hello Michael, On Sat, 17 Jun 2017, Michael Biebl wrote: > I would suggest to simply ship a drop-in snippet for schroot, which sets > the Type and Timeout. Thanks for the suggestion but I'll skip it. This is what I would have expected DSA to do if I had not shipped a systemd service unit. But

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Am 17.06.2017 um 22:27 schrieb Michael Biebl: > For that create a file > /lib/systemd/system/schroot.service.d/timeout.conf (feel free to choose > a better name), containing: > > [Service] > Type=oneshot > TimeoutSec=infinity If you only need to change the timeout, I probably wouldn't change

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Hi Raphaël, Am 17.06.2017 um 19:59 schrieb Michael Biebl: > Am 06.06.2017 um 17:31 schrieb Raphaël Hertzog: >> +[Service] >> +Type=oneshot ... > Hm, so you just wrapped the sysv init script, but didn't actually > provide a native systemd unit. > Why is the unit generated by systemd-sysv-generator

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Am 06.06.2017 um 17:31 schrieb Raphaël Hertzog: > .PHONY: override_dh_auto_configure override_dh_auto_clean > override_dh_auto_build override_dh_auto_test override_dh_auto_install > override_dh_installchangelogs override_dh_installinit install-arch > install-indep > diff -Nru

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:31:36PM +0200, Raphaël Hertzog wrote: > It might not qualify for last minutes updates and I would understand > if you ask me to handle this via stretch-pu in the future but I would like > to have two bugs fixed in stretch: > > - the completion code is completely broken

Bug#864297: unblock: schroot/1.6.10-4

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package schroot It might not qualify for last minutes updates and I would understand if you ask me to handle this via stretch-pu in the future but I would like to have two