Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-31 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 31/10/17 01:53, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Followup-For: Bug #879787 > > The binNMUs for experimental: > > nmu akonadi_4:17.08.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against > qtbase-abi-5-9-2." > nmu qtspeech-opensource-src_5.9.1-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild > against

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-31 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Followup-For: Bug #879787 The binNMUs for experimental: nmu akonadi_4:17.08.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against qtbase-abi-5-9-2." nmu qtspeech-opensource-src_5.9.1-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against qtbase-abi-5-9-2." Andreas

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-29 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 28/10/17 03:15, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: forwarded -1 >> https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> I wish they didn't do that in micro releases... >>

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-28 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > I wish they didn't do that in micro releases... > > I assume the rdeps are building fine? If so, go

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-27 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:01:12AM +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On donderdag 26 oktober 2017 00:40:44 CEST Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > Qt 5.9.2 is a bugfix release in 5.9 LTS series, yet it has some minor > > private ABI breaks so we have bumped the ABI virtual package names. > > Just did an

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-27 Thread Diederik de Haas
On donderdag 26 oktober 2017 00:40:44 CEST Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Qt 5.9.2 is a bugfix release in 5.9 LTS series, yet it has some minor > private ABI breaks so we have bumped the ABI virtual package names. Just did an 'aptitude safe-upgrade' on my sid machine and noticed the following packages

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-26 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 10:36:31AM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > I wish they didn't do that in micro releases... > > I assume the rdeps are building fine? If so, go

Processed: Re: Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html Bug #879787 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html'. > tags -1

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-26 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-9-2.html Control: tags -1 confirmed On 25/10/17 23:40, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear release

Bug#879787: transition: qtbase-opensource-src 5.9.2

2017-10-25 Thread Dmitry Shachnev
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear release team, We would like to request (yet another) transition for Qt packages. Qt 5.9.2 is a bugfix release in 5.9 LTS series, yet it has some minor private ABI breaks so we