Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-22 Thread Graham Inggs
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 22:52, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: > The error message points to joblib, which has just been uploaded > (#942899): try again when the new version is available? That worked, thanks. I'll schedule the rest of the architectures later.

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-22 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
On 22/11/2019 17:06, Graham Inggs wrote: I scheduled statsmodels there, but it still fails. The error message points to joblib, which has just been uploaded (#942899): try again when the new version is available?

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-22 Thread Graham Inggs
Hi Rebecca > The binNMUs (to add python3.8 support) of pandas and statsmodels failed. > I think this will make them work (but haven't tried it): > > - Apply the (existing) #943418 fix to python-xlrd. > - Build matplotlib, pandas and statsmodels in that order. (ben can't > work this out because

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-19 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
The binNMUs (to add python3.8 support) of pandas and statsmodels failed. I think this will make them work (but haven't tried it): - Apply the (existing) #943418 fix to python-xlrd. - Build matplotlib, pandas and statsmodels in that order. (ben can't work this out because the declared

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
I have uploaded pandas and statsmodels. On 10/11/2019 14:18, Matthias Klose wrote: https://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/ The patsy one has a bug: as debian/tests/nosetests3 was a symlink to nosetests2, it should have deleted this link and renamed nosetests2 to nosetests3, not deleted

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-10 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10.11.19 14:46, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: mdp isn't in testing either, but if you're using a policy of "no py2removals that break packages in testing", tnseq-transit (Depends: statsmodels) and possibly stimfit (Recommends: pandas) need to be done as well.  Those are both thought to need new

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
mdp isn't in testing either, but if you're using a policy of "no py2removals that break packages in testing", tnseq-transit (Depends: statsmodels) and possibly stimfit (Recommends: pandas) need to be done as well. Those are both thought to need new upstream versions. (patsy isn't a leaf

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-10 Thread Matthias Klose
On 10.11.19 14:22, Matthias Klose wrote: patsy is a leaf package, no problem. scikit-learn, needs mdp, pymvpa2, I think that's manageable, so I'm volunteering to do the NMUs, preferably with a 0 or 1 day delay. PyMVPA has other RC issues, is removed from testing, so ignore it for now. and

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-10 Thread Matthias Klose
[CCing debian-science] On 10.11.19 13:18, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote: Matthias Klose wrote: yes, please do [raise pandas 0.25 blocking bugs to "important"] Done, but only 2 of them have been fixed since. This leaves 13: has patch or Ubuntu fix: matplotlib2 patsy python-apptools scikit-learn

Bug#942106: python3.8 / pandas py2removal

2019-11-10 Thread Rebecca N. Palmer
Matthias Klose wrote: yes, please do [raise pandas 0.25 blocking bugs to "important"] Done, but only 2 of them have been fixed since. This leaves 13: has patch or Ubuntu fix: matplotlib2 patsy python-apptools scikit-learn may need more extensive work: cnvkit python-feather-format python-skbio