Your message dated Sun, 9 Feb 2020 13:18:40 +0100
with message-id <1f31697a-3216-11e1-d043-60e0b1873...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#950342: RM: volatility/2.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950342,
regarding RM: volatility/2.6.1-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
950342: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=950342
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Please remove volatility from testing;  volatility is the last reverse
dependency of python-openpyxl, which can then be dropped.

I've already filed an RC bug against src:volatility to keep it out of testing.

Thanks,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.0
  APT prefers unstable-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 
'experimental-debug'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_PROPRIETARY_MODULE, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE= 
(charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Sandro,

On 07-02-2020 04:14, Sandro Tosi wrote:
>> But it still has a reverse dependency. I think that package should get
>> time drop the dependency first, don't you think (it seems to me that
>> it's a meta-package that could easily do that)?
> 
> `forensics-all` is a metapackage from `src:forensics-all`, and i
> thought we could ignore those?
> 
> anyhow, with this upload
> https://packages.qa.debian.org/f/forensics-all/news/20200205T132048Z.html
> volatility was dropped from forensics-all and now dak is clean:
> 
> ```
> $ ssh coccia.debian.org "dak rm -Rn -b volatility"
> Will remove the following packages from unstable:
> 
> volatility |    2.6.1-1 | all
> 
> Maintainer: Debian Security Tools <team+pkg-secur...@tracker.debian.org>
> 
> ------------------- Reason -------------------
> 
> ----------------------------------------------
> 
> Checking reverse dependencies...
> No dependency problem found.
> ```
> 
> can we proceed?

The change migrated to testing. I have added a removal hint. Thanks.

Paul

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to