Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread Thorsten Glaser
On Thu, 3 Dec 2020, tony mancill wrote: > Given that the JVM bug can affect any application seems to tilt the > scale towards proceeding with the JDK update, so the release of an > upgrade path for Jenkins is a relief. How about versioning it differently? Make it 11.0.9-2 for a while? Convince

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 05:34:25PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility] > > > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2020-12-03 at 11:28 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility] > > On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in >

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-12-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
[adding d-java to Cc for greater visibility] On Mon, 2020-11-30 at 09:21 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the > > upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-30 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the > upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a regression > [1] introduced in upstream release 11.0.9+11, which is present in > buster via a security upload [2].

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 11:07 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 04:56:28PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 08:01 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:10:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:23:45PM -0800,

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-28 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 04:56:28PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 08:01 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:10:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:23:45PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > > > -with_check = disabled for this

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-28 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2020-11-28 at 08:01 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:10:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:23:45PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > > -with_check = disabled for this upload > > > +# with_check = disabled for this upload > > > ... > > > >

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-28 Thread tony mancill
On Sat, Nov 28, 2020 at 05:10:39PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:23:45PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: > >... > > --- openjdk-11-11.0.9+11/debian/changelog 2020-10-22 07:49:15.0 > > -0700 > > +++ openjdk-11-11.0.9.1+1/debian/changelog 2020-11-25 08:55:48.0

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-28 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 08:23:45PM -0800, tony mancill wrote: >... > --- openjdk-11-11.0.9+11/debian/changelog 2020-10-22 07:49:15.0 > -0700 > +++ openjdk-11-11.0.9.1+1/debian/changelog2020-11-25 08:55:48.0 > -0800 > @@ -1,8 +1,16 @@ > -openjdk-11 (11.0.9+11-1~deb10u1)

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2020-11-26 at 07:32 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > Does the confirmed tag indicate that I should proceed with a source > upload? Yes, please feel free to. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Regards, Adam

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-26 Thread tony mancill
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 08:07:47AM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the > > upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a regression

Processed: Re: Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + confirmed Bug #975874 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 975874: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975874 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-26 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Wed, 2020-11-25 at 20:23 -0800, tony mancill wrote: > I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the > upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a regression > [1] introduced in upstream release 11.0.9+11, which is present in >

Bug#975874: buster-pu: package openjdk-11/11.0.9.1+1-1~deb10u1

2020-11-25 Thread tony mancill
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hello Release Team: I propose that openjdk-11 be updated to upstream 11.0.9.1+1 in the upcoming stable point release. This update addresses a regression [1] introduced in upstream