Yes, I agress it is a good idea to have the versioning of the next
release desided alread at release time for release notes.
I was just a bit used to get to wonder about that a bit until release,
making guesses, betting etc. :)
//Marcus
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb:
pThe integration of OpenJDK, a free version of Sun's Java technology,
into Debian GNU/Linux 5.0 made it possible to ship Java based
applications in Debians main repository./p
It is worth mentioning OpenJDK in Debian, but the conclusion is plain wrong and
Hi
I found this in the release notes:
4.10. Deprecated packages
With the next release of Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 (codenamed squeeze)
   a bigger number of server packages will be deprecated, thus
updating to newer versions of those now will save you from
trouble when updating to
On 2009-02-11 16:43, Marcus Lundblad wrote:
Should squeeze be referred to as 6.0 already?
Wouldn't that be decided later?
That has been announced by Adeodato Simó on 2009-01-28. It's a
good idea to decide both release (number) and code name one
release ahead for stuff like release notes, right?
Daniel Baumann wrote:
jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
pDebian GNU/Linux can be installed [...] paragraph:
[...]
haven't seen a commit of that to your draft, has this been
lost/forgotton or are there any problems with the paragraph?
--
Address:Daniel
Hi!
Daniel Baumann schrieb:
Daniel Baumann wrote:
jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
pDebian GNU/Linux can be installed [...] paragraph:
[...]
haven't seen a commit of that to your draft, has this been
lost/forgotton or are there any problems with the
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
I've been busy at work and will update the draft in the evening including
your change (as well as the other changes in the thread).
good to know, thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4562 Biberist
Email:
Hi!
Adeodato Simó schrieb:
Hey, Alexander, thanks for your work here! Some minor comments follow:
Thanks for the feedback; I applied your changes / added FIXME so I won't
forget them.
Hypervisor 3.2.1, OpenJDK 6b11 and more than 23,000 other ready to use
software packages./p
I don't
Hi!
W. Martin Borgert schrieb:
Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
- Debian Live
- Emdebian
- Blu-ray
- Netbooks/EEE PC
One sentence each, written by a native speaker (i.e. not me! ha!)
All these got mentioned (by now).
Not sure about:
- SELinux
- OpenVZ
Don't know
Hi,
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
search and replace in the release notes.
I think it would be better to explicitly mention this change. Granted, many
people never switched to aptitude, but for those who did
Hi!
W. Martin Borgert schrieb:
It's difficult to change all occurrences at the same time. Why
not start with the release announcement and explicitly say 1x000
*source* packages? Let's change it in other documents/pages when
we're at them. Counting binary packages feels a little bit like
On 2009-02-10 11:32, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Dienstag, 10. Februar 2009, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
search and replace in the release notes.
I think it would be better to explicitly mention this change. Granted, many
people never
On 2009-02-10 20:54, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
What about:
... and more than 23,000 other packages ready to use software packages
(build from over 12,000 source packages).
Perfect!
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe.
W. Martin Borgert deba...@debian.org (10/02/2009):
On 2009-02-10 20:54, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
What about:
... and more than 23,000 other packages ready to use software packages
(build from over 12,000 source packages).
built?
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
[ dropping some lists from CC since the involved people are either
subscribed somewhere else or BCCed ]
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl schrieb:
The most current version may be found in a private subversion repository
(to avoid conflicts when using the wiki). You can get the most recent
version
Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
===
h2Dedication/h2
pDebian GNU/Linux 5.0 qLenny/q to Thiemo Seufer, a Debian
Developer who
died on December 26th, 2008 in a tragic car accident.
There seems to be a part of the sentence missing...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Luk Claes schrieb:
pDebian GNU/Linux 5.0 qLenny/q to Thiemo Seufer, a Debian
Developer who died on December 26th, 2008 in a tragic car accident.
There seems to be a part of the sentence missing...
Thanks, fixed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
the current state ]
Hi!
Attached you'll find the current draft of the announcement for the lenny
release. Based upon the announcement for the last release it's far from
ready :(
Especially the second and third
Zitat von Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info:
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure everyone is aware of
the current state ]
Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
- Debian Live
- Emdebian
- Blu-ray
- SELinux
- OpenVZ
- Netbooks/EEE PC
One sentence
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
pDebian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
of eleven architectures are supported including: Sun SPARC (sparc), HP
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:46:55 +0200, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
pDebian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
of eleven
Hey, Alexander, thanks for your work here! Some minor comments follow:
supports a total of eleven processor architectures
As per Riku's comment about armel being missing, this should be 12.
A total of eleven architectures are supported including:
Same here.
Support for Macromedias Flash
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009, David Paleino wrote:
processors. The old ARM port (arm) is now depreceated./p
^^^
s/depreceated/deprecated/
But... has it really been deprecated? Didn't know that :P
According to the release notes it will be in Lenny but
McGovern ne...@debian.org
Subject: Re: Draft for lenny release announcement
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:15:23AM +0100, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
Debian GNU/Linux runs on computers ranging from palmtops and handheld
systems to supercomputers, and on nearly everything in between. A total
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
- Debian Live
jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
pDebian GNU/Linux can be installed [...] paragraph:
pIn addition to the regular installation media, Debian GNU/Linux can
now also be
On Mon, 09 Feb 2009 14:41:12 +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Maybe I overlooked it, but I suggest to mention:
- Debian Live
jup. therefore, please include the following paragraph below the
pDebian GNU/Linux can be installed [...] paragraph:
pIn addition to the
On Monday 09 February 2009 13:19:06 Adeodato Simó wrote:
Support for Macromedias Flash format is available via the swfdec plugin.
Should Gnash be mentioned here? Is it ready for such a high profile
mention? (Maintainers Bcc'ed.)
I believe this would have to be (replace (R) with the
pThe Debian Project is pleased to announce the official release of
Debian GNU/Linux version 5.0, codenamed qetch/q, after 22 months of
Hmm, shouldn't that be:
codenamed qlenny/q :-)
and
pAlso beginning with Debian GNU/Linux 4.0, the package management
system
has been improved regarding
On 2009-02-09, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl alexan...@schmehl.info wrote:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--040603030801070601030404
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
[ Sorry for the cross post; just trying to make sure
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
pUpgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
also by the apt-get package management tool.
This should be consistent with the Release Notes. I haven't been
Ben Finney wrote:
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
pUpgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
also by the apt-get package management tool.
This should be consistent with the Release Notes. I
Steve Langasek wrote:
The preferred tool is aptitude.
This is not a matter for you to decide by fiat. The tools recommended in
the release notes should be the ones that work most reliably for
dist-upgrading from the previous release. Based on various upgrade reports
I've seen over the
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 11:07:28PM +0200, Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote:
Ben Finney wrote:
Adeodato Simó d...@net.com.org.es writes:
pUpgrades [… are automatically handled by the aptitude package
management tool for most configurations, and to a certain degree
also by the apt-get package
Zitat von Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org:
This is not a matter for you to decide by fiat. The tools recommended in
the release notes should be the ones that work most reliably for
dist-upgrading from the previous release. Based on various upgrade reports
I've seen over the past year, that
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 23:17 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
Note, that the release notes still recommend aptitude (which
I never used, so I'm neither pro nor contra), because it was
agreed on for the etch release notes and the bug #411280 is
still open. I would be happy if we (better late than
Zitat von Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
I don't think recommending its use in the release notes for
etch-lenny is a good idea at all.
We could propably change aptitude into apt-get by a simple
search and replace in the release notes. (Not globally, there
are some cases, where this is not
36 matches
Mail list logo
