В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:55:44 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy написа:
The transition monitor shows that order. If the order inferred from
the build-dependencies is incorrect, then there is a problem in your
packages.
There is no problem with the build-dependencies. The only problem is
when a package gets
On 08/23/2010 10:34 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
В Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:55:44 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy написа:
The transition monitor shows that order. If the order inferred from
the build-dependencies is incorrect, then there is a problem in
your packages.
There is no problem with the
this for GNUstep
packages too (in squeeze+1, now it's too late for surgeries).
(which is way better than errors at runtime or hidden breakages).
Undoubtedly.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
at? If it's not
too hard, it'll be nice to implement this for GNUstep packages too
(in squeeze+1, now it's too late for surgeries).
Yes, it's dh-ocaml. If you need more details about how it works, I'll be
glad to help (privately… no need to bother the list).
Regards,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
[CCing -release because this is a FAQ during GNUstep transitions; hope
you don't mind.]
Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 08/21/2010 05:28 PM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
BTW, talksoup.app must be binNMUed on all archs once a binNMUed
gnustep-netclasses is available everywhere.
I'll schedule the necessary
On 08/23/2010 12:34 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
[CCing -release because this is a FAQ during GNUstep transitions;
hope you don't mind.]
If you want…
[...]
I usually schedule binNMUs according to a topological order computed
from build-dependencies informations. The transition monitor shows
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 07:47:14PM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:20:32 +0100, Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Re: Hubert Chan 2006-03-15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam released a new version of GNUstep Make and Base today that bumps
the soversion of -base. That means yet
Re: Hubert Chan 2006-03-15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam released a new version of GNUstep Make and Base today that bumps
the soversion of -base. That means yet another GNUstep library
transition. argh. Hopefully this transition will go much smoother than
the last one (although we're still waiting
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:20:32 +0100, Christoph Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Re: Hubert Chan 2006-03-15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Adam released a new version of GNUstep Make and Base today that bumps
the soversion of -base. That means yet another GNUstep library
transition. argh. Hopefully this
Adam released a new version of GNUstep Make and Base today that bumps
the soversion of -base. That means yet another GNUstep library
transition. argh. Hopefully this transition will go much smoother than
the last one (although we're still waiting on a few things in NEW).
New packages will
Hi,
Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge.
(soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed)
One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built
on arm)
But all the 53 others GNUstep packages are valid candidates and cannot
enter in sarge
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge.
(soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed)
One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built
on arm)
gnustep-antlr/arm
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Hi,
Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge.
(soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed)
One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built
on arm)
There is 1 other
On 2005-01-05 19:00:24 +0100 Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Hi,
Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge.
(soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed)
One package is not a valid
Colin Watson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:21:01PM +0100, Eric Heintzmann wrote:
Currently, latest GNUstep packages cannot enter in sarge.
(soname change and nearly all packages have been renamed)
One package is not a valid candidate : gnustep-antlr (Cannot be built
on arm)
gnustep
15 matches
Mail list logo
