Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2013-01-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 21:56:02 +0200 Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically > > > get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first > > > time, subsequent upgrades come from backports. But in the case of > > > icewease

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-14 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012, David Prévot wrote: > [ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue > than -release ] > > Hi, > > Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit : > > > When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically > > get your upgrades from ther

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-14 Thread David Prévot
[ Maybe a -backports list would be a better place to discuss this issue than -release ] Hi, Le 14/10/2012 03:41, Mike Hommey a écrit : > When you have backports in your sources.list, you don't automatically > get your upgrades from there. Once you do install one for the first > time, subsequent

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-14 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 02:19:25PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the > > iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will > > automatically

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:43:48 +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the working pinning setup to the > iceweasel package itself, so that people that add backports source will > automatically get proper upgrades? Or maybe not, I'm just throwing an > idea. > What do

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Michael Biebl
On 13.10.2012 09:43, Mike Hommey wrote: > That being said, I think we should actively advise people to use > backports for iceweasel. Making that statement part of the release notes > might be a good idea. Possibly with a working pinning setup. > > Or maybe it would be a good idea to add the work

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 09:41:08AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove. > > > > Now I have a question about its release/update schedule. > > As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefo

Re: Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-13 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 07:13:08AM +0900, Hideki Yamane wrote: > Hi, > > Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove. > > Now I have a question about its release/update schedule. > As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ says, they'll > terminate Firefox 10.0.x ESR and move

Iceweasel/Icedove ESR and Whezzy

2012-10-12 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, Thank you for maintaining Iceweasel/Icedove. Now I have a question about its release/update schedule. As http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/organizations/faq/ says, they'll terminate Firefox 10.0.x ESR and move forward to 17.0.x. And its date seems to be around Wheezy release. It means