On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1],
How is this supposed to work, anyway?
• I don’t see either a bts entry or an explanation linked anywhere.
It's
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 04:14:06PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1],
How is this supposed to work, anyway?
• I don’t see either a bts entry or an explanation linked anywhere.
It was pretty
On Mon, 2 Sep 2013, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1],
How is this supposed to work, anyway?
• I don’t see either a bts entry or an explanation linked anywhere.
• ruby1.9.1 Build-Depends ruby1.8
bye,
//mirabilos
--
«MyISAM tables -will- get
Hi!
On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1],
at least two affected packages, apt-listbugs and schleuder, are missing.
Nicolas Dandrimont spotted a mistake in the following regexp:
Bad: .depends ~ /(lib?)ruby1.8/
which should probably be:
Bad: .depends ~
On Mon, 2013-09-02 at 15:06 +0200, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
On the page described the transition to get rid of Ruby 1.8 [1],
at least two affected packages, apt-listbugs and schleuder, are missing.
Nicolas Dandrimont spotted a mistake in the following regexp:
Bad: .depends ~ /(lib?)ruby1.8/
5 matches
Mail list logo