Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-09-13 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 02:55:50PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:59:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: +1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month, sending people an

Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-09-13 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 13.09.2011 19:01, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: [] This is still unfixed in sid, though. Indeed so. In any case, since I have rolled this out on some servers I manage, I thought I may as well confirm that a patch (attached) adopted from

Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-08-27 Thread Philipp Kern
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 12:59:09PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: +1 for this patch to be applied in stable. Apart from the inconvenience of being emailed by all your Debian systems using mdadm once a month, sending people an email about a normal situation is likely to mean that people miss

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 02:52:31PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. I'd tend to allow it if you show me a successful piuparts run in stable with the new version (or if I get around to do the same thing). And, more importantly, this needs to be

Re: Bug#598957: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-06 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 02:36:08PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: - Original message - also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-06-06 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 03/05/2011 08:52, Thomas Goirand a écrit : -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 +[ $quiet -lt 1 ] echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 Out of context, I would prefer something like: if [ $quiet

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-04 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next r-release? -- .''`. martin f.

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-04 Thread Thomas Goirand
- Original message - also sprach Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org [2011.05.03.2004 +0200]: I don't think that's worth a stable update on its own. It's apparently an inconvenience to our users, and fixable with a trivial patch. Are there arguments against it going into the next

NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-03 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hello to the release team! I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598957 It seems that there is a consensus for this fix: -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice I/O scheduling class for resync of $array. 2 +[ $quiet -lt 1 ] echo

Re: NMU of mdadm for squeeze-proposed-upates

2011-05-03 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 14:52:31 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: Hello to the release team! I would like to upload a fix for #598957 in Squeeze. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598957 It seems that there is a consensus for this fix: -echo $PROGNAME: I: selecting $ionice